IS ROSE UNTOUCHABLE?

[london sonic]

Is there anyway Seattle can trade up for rose ? i doubt we can do it but what do think

chicago covert a defensive big werent they once interested in collison.
we also have numerous draft picks .
chicago has a solid point already.
dont they want to win now can they wait 3 years for rose (ie paul and deron)
beasley doesnt solve there problems either.

how about this trade which works in trade checker.

seattle trades chicago trades

collison-defensive big no1 pick rose
marshall-expiring contract tyrus thomas -young pf
watson-solid backup for larry hughes - large contract
4th pick-bayless,b lopez,love,gordon
24th pick-hibbert,cdr,walker,r lopez
future 2009 spurs pick
future 2010 suns pick

[london sonic]

not clear

seattle trades -collison-def big,watson -solid backup,marshall expiring ,4th pick,24th pick 2009 spurs pick and 2010 suns pick

chicago trades -no1 pick rose,tyrus thomas and larry hughes huge contact

[sonictecture]

I don't know if Rose is considered untouchable, but I don't think that what is being offered for Rose in this scenario is what Chicago would want in return.

[LightsOut514]

No way does Chicago even think about that deal. That's nowhere near enough.

Also you realize Tyrus Thomas was a top 5 pick a couple years ago, not fodder for throw-in right?

I don't think Rose is untouchable but to trade up to #1 you'd have to give them a near unbelieveable package, and that's definitely not it.

[BrockEvil]

nothing the sonics have is worth trading to chicago for the first pick...except if it involved durant

[AirGordon]

Wow at that trade. That is horrible. Nothing personal but that is bad. Pretty much everyone on the Bulls board would not give up the #1 for Durant straight up. Lead alone #1/Tyrus for the #4/Collison/future firsts from good teams?

Tyrus>>>Collison. Based off potential Tyrus is still so young and Collison is at his peak. Tyrus will most likely end up much better than Collison. And Obviously #1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #4 and future firsts from good teams. Horrible trade offer.

I mean do you realize we would be giving up a possible future super star for very little in return? You guys already have your possible future super star in Durant. No way you guys can get a 2nd one without even giving up Durant in return. That or getting lucky in a future lottery.

But ya you guys dont have anything that can get the #1 from us. Like I said Durant would not even do it IMO. Some people would consider it though but really I think even if Durant was offered for the #1 theres a good chance it would get turned down for sure.

Heck Beasley put up better numbers than Durant in less minutes as a freshman. So rite off the bat there is a good chance Beasley will have a better rookie season than Durant had. Plus many people see Rose as being a top 3 pg in the NBA in a few years. A few out there even think he may end up being as good if not better than Chris Paul. You dont give up either Beasley or Rose.

[yearsago]

. Pretty much everyone on the Bulls board would not give up the #1 for Durant straight up.

.

I am glad bulls and sonics fan will agree, because I wouldn't give durant for rose. And bulls fans wouldn't take Durant for Rose.

[AirGordon]

Ya its not even worth discussion really. I would personally take Rose or Beasley over Durant (it would be tough though since I think all 3 have great potential) I just saw this post and decided to check it out and when I saw that offer I was kind of blown away so I thought I would respond.

But ya if you guys can get lucky in another future lottery than you may end up with another possible future super star but I cant see it happening this draft. Rose wont fall past #2 and Beasley wont fall past #3 and thats assuming Miami were to pick Mayo over Beasley (given the rumors going around who knows) but hey we will see how everything plays out.

[BrockEvil]

I wasn't saying Durant for the the first pick straight up... i said it just had to involve durant in the trade