mrfatwrecker wrote:Lakers/Grizzlies trade just got a little, teeny weeny, less lopsided
fixed.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
mrfatwrecker wrote:Lakers/Grizzlies trade just got a little, teeny weeny, less lopsided
A.J. wrote:mrfatwrecker wrote:j-ragg wrote:I would take Aruajo over Gasol.
but would you take Aruajo over Iguodala?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I dont care if he signed the deal or not, Javaris Crittenton can turn out to be a stud at PG and they would would have gotten ripped off. The trade was so one-side.
If the Lakers so how have the worst record next year maybe I would change my mind.
LakerFanMan wrote:I've seen stuff like this said a bunch of times and I don't get the logic. If Gasol and/or Critt turn out to be really good players then the trade would still be lopsided? Im not saying they will, and I think the Grizz got ripped off too. However, saying stuff like that sounds more like Laker hate then anything.
penbeast0 wrote:Yes, he did. And as a mod, I can't even put him on ignore . . . sigh.
microfib4thewin wrote:Except Ratliff's contract was already used for the KG trade. I believe the post meant ones that were available before the deadline.
mrfatwrecker wrote:You seriously think Miami would have given up what they thought at the time would end up being Michael Beasley at #1 overall? No way. Also, lots of teams have expirings yes, when you add up multiple small expiring contracts together. Kwame had the largest expiring contract for a single player this past season: fact.
Also, NO TEAMS WERE WILLING TO ABSORB ALL THE SALARY WITHOUT SENDING CONTRACTS BACK. Not only did the Lakers have the largest sole expiring contract, but they were willing to to keep big contracts like Odom without demanding that Memphis take some of the hit.
Pau has been on the block for a long time now. Memphis was actively calling GM's all around the league and also receiving calls. You don't think that if Memphis could have gotten what they wanted from someone else, then they wouldn't have?
Of course AFTER the fact, other GMs come out and say, well crap, I guess I could've and should've matched that, but I'm an idiot.