#2 to lakers?
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Junior
- Posts: 495
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jun 03, 2004
Re: #2 to lakers?
500 on -70%
Re: #2 to lakers?
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 96,345
- And1: 25,471
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
-
Re: #2 to lakers?
CITYOFANGELSX3 wrote:Riley likes to rob people in trades, not get robbed.
and will the rest of the league be up in arms at the lakes getting another sweet deal
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,794
- And1: 99
- Joined: Apr 12, 2007
- Location: cali baby
Re: #2 to lakers?
mayo/kobe/artest/gasol/bynum
defense would be nuts!!!!!!
defense would be nuts!!!!!!
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,830
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 02, 2007
- Location: OC, CA
Re: #2 to lakers?
I think the Artest talk is done, he wants 10M. I think the top three picks should be Rose, Mayo, Love...That will be the three player run for the ROY next year, with Beasley no where to be found.
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,794
- And1: 99
- Joined: Apr 12, 2007
- Location: cali baby
Re: #2 to lakers?
^^
beasley is a great talent...bt i just dont see the will in him to take it to the next level.
mayo's been quieting everyone...hes letting his game speak and at first he was a #6 or 5 pick...now they are even talking him about being a 2nd pick...
beasley is a great talent...bt i just dont see the will in him to take it to the next level.
mayo's been quieting everyone...hes letting his game speak and at first he was a #6 or 5 pick...now they are even talking him about being a 2nd pick...
Re: #2 to lakers?
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 96,345
- And1: 25,471
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
-
Re: #2 to lakers?
beasley will go in the top 3, but i don't think he'll be that great as a pro either, not sure why
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,833
- And1: 44,862
- Joined: Feb 06, 2007
- Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.
Re: #2 to lakers?
Wow, a physical starting power forward AND the No. 2 pick in the draft for little old Lamar Odom. That's a first-ballot candidate for the Real GM Masturbatory Trade Rumors Hall of Fame.
Re: #2 to lakers?
- TonyMontana
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,726
- And1: 398
- Joined: Apr 27, 2006
- Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
-
Re: #2 to lakers?
Sedale Threatt wrote:Wow, a physical starting power forward AND the No. 2 pick in the draft for little old Lamar Odom. That's a first-ballot candidate for the Real GM Masturbatory Trade Rumors Hall of Fame.
lollllllllllll............. No KIDDING.
Re: #2 to lakers?
- Italianhanger
- Senior
- Posts: 684
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 03, 2007
- Location: working out w/ Andrew Bynum
Re: #2 to lakers?
this is not going to happen
Re: #2 to lakers?
- kno
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 19,495
- And1: 24
- Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Re: #2 to lakers?
* Just to let you guys know, there is now an Official NBA DRaft thread where everything draft can be discussed by the members of our Laker community.
It is stickied at the top of the board. Here's a link to it. *
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=817622
It is stickied at the top of the board. Here's a link to it. *
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=817622
Re: #2 to lakers?
- milesfides
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,012
- And1: 1,449
- Joined: Nov 09, 2004
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
Re: #2 to lakers?
This would be a great trade for both teams.
Gives Miami a surefire better chance to win now, and cuts the Lakers' salary. The fact that Miami has been shopping the pick tells me what I thought - Beasley has some red flags, and Bayless and Mayo, despite the reports of pairing them up with Wade in the backcourt, their games are too similar to Wade's - neither is a true, natural PG.
If I were Miami, there's no question Wade-Marion-Odom would be ready to go next year. And considering Marion and Odom are big expiring contracts, there's always the potential to nab another disgruntled star.
If I were the Lakers, OJ Mayo seems to be the natural choice as the other guard in the triangle. He has all the right skills, work ethic, feel for the game, and defensively, he has the size and instincts to prevent that position from becoming a liability. He's not a true PG, but his skills and size works quite well for us.
If Haslem and Blount are included, a re-signed Turiaf is most likely going to be a casualty.
Gives Miami a surefire better chance to win now, and cuts the Lakers' salary. The fact that Miami has been shopping the pick tells me what I thought - Beasley has some red flags, and Bayless and Mayo, despite the reports of pairing them up with Wade in the backcourt, their games are too similar to Wade's - neither is a true, natural PG.
If I were Miami, there's no question Wade-Marion-Odom would be ready to go next year. And considering Marion and Odom are big expiring contracts, there's always the potential to nab another disgruntled star.
If I were the Lakers, OJ Mayo seems to be the natural choice as the other guard in the triangle. He has all the right skills, work ethic, feel for the game, and defensively, he has the size and instincts to prevent that position from becoming a liability. He's not a true PG, but his skills and size works quite well for us.
If Haslem and Blount are included, a re-signed Turiaf is most likely going to be a casualty.
Re: #2 to lakers?
- RJM
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,609
- And1: 2,266
- Joined: Oct 16, 2007
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
-
Re: #2 to lakers?
Miami did virtually nothing in this draft.
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,272
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 25, 2006
- Location: Fresno
Re: #2 to lakers?
Lakers:
SF:Beasley/Ariza/Radmanovic
PF:Gasol/Haslem/Turiaf
C;Bynum/Blount/Mihm
SG:Bryant/Vujacic/Walton
PG:Fusher/Farmar
SF:Beasley/Ariza/Radmanovic
PF:Gasol/Haslem/Turiaf
C;Bynum/Blount/Mihm
SG:Bryant/Vujacic/Walton
PG:Fusher/Farmar
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,794
- And1: 99
- Joined: Apr 12, 2007
- Location: cali baby
Re: #2 to lakers?
mayo
kobe
artest
gasol
bynum
>>
that ^^
kobe
artest
gasol
bynum
>>
that ^^
Re: #2 to lakers?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 10,759
- And1: 198
- Joined: Mar 19, 2005
- Location: Norway
-
Re: #2 to lakers?
The #2/Haslem for Odom centered deal would've been sick for us. Never understood why Miami would pay that much for Odom tho. Maybe Riles wants to give a little back from the Shaq deal or something. lol