Tiger Woods Disses Hockey

User avatar
timd1218
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 2,380
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 24, 2005
Location: I will eat your soul.
Contact:

Re: Tiger Woods Disses Hockey 

Post#41 » by timd1218 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 5:05 am

Induveca wrote:Blame it on the idiotic lockout. I actually went to a few hockey games, tried to like the sport.......literally wanted to help out since I knew the league was seriously struggling. Actually became a Caps fan, followed them on TV and everything. Then they do the one year lockout.

Completely disappeared off my radar. I could care less at this point. The NHL lost millions of potential fans through that move. And now what network are they on again? Spike TV? I live in Peru half the year now, and I can watch every NFL game, every MLB game and every NBA game........but not a single NHL game.

NHL execs have run the league into the ground. But I agree the game itself is amazing.



Before you say crap like this, maybe you should do some research and find out why the NHL went to a lockout.

Read what Harding said, that's about it. Plus, it was getting to be like baseball. The rich teams bought the best players. I know, the best players don't always win, but it's dumb when all you read about are the Yankees signing someone for $20 million a season. That's where hockey was going. Now, with the salary cap, every team is in competition, something MLB needs to do.

And who cares about those potential fans. They're missing the greatest sport on earth. The NHL is doing just fine without them.. Attendance is great. Who cares if they're not on ESPN. ESPN is a joke anyway.

By the way, they play on VERSUS and NBC. VERSUS is also starting to become a household network.

And since you live in Peru, you can watch a hockey game. It's called turn on your computer, get online and go to NHLTV. Ta da, you can watch hockey.
Image
I know what you're thinking. We're in the middle of a city, what's a hawk doing there?
User avatar
UTMCretin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,087
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 05, 2006
Location: Look happy, it's the end of the world

Re: Tiger Woods Disses Hockey 

Post#42 » by UTMCretin » Mon Jul 7, 2008 5:55 am

Summary: In the short term, the lockout hurt the NHL. In the long term, it will have saved it.

EVERYBODY'S (a little bit) RIGHT! HOORAY!
User avatar
timd1218
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 2,380
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 24, 2005
Location: I will eat your soul.
Contact:

Re: Tiger Woods Disses Hockey 

Post#43 » by timd1218 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 6:31 pm

UTMCretin wrote:Summary: In the short term, the lockout hurt the NHL. In the long term, it will have saved it.

EVERYBODY'S (a little bit) RIGHT! HOORAY!


How do you think it hurt the NHL short term?
Image
I know what you're thinking. We're in the middle of a city, what's a hawk doing there?
Crowned
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 4,491
And1: 155
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Toronto

Re: Tiger Woods Disses Hockey 

Post#44 » by Crowned » Mon Jul 7, 2008 7:22 pm

timd1218 wrote:
UTMCretin wrote:Summary: In the short term, the lockout hurt the NHL. In the long term, it will have saved it.

EVERYBODY'S (a little bit) RIGHT! HOORAY!


How do you think it hurt the NHL short term?



Short term? Popularity is nowhere near what it used to be.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

Re: Tiger Woods Disses Hockey 

Post#45 » by WEFFPIM » Mon Jul 7, 2008 7:45 pm

timd1218 wrote:
UTMCretin wrote:Summary: In the short term, the lockout hurt the NHL. In the long term, it will have saved it.

EVERYBODY'S (a little bit) RIGHT! HOORAY!


How do you think it hurt the NHL short term?


Did you just ask that?
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
User avatar
timd1218
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 2,380
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 24, 2005
Location: I will eat your soul.
Contact:

Re: Tiger Woods Disses Hockey 

Post#46 » by timd1218 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 7:58 pm

Crowned wrote:
timd1218 wrote:
UTMCretin wrote:Summary: In the short term, the lockout hurt the NHL. In the long term, it will have saved it.

EVERYBODY'S (a little bit) RIGHT! HOORAY!


How do you think it hurt the NHL short term?



Short term? Popularity is nowhere near what it used to be.


Salary Cap has increased year by year. Popularity isn't a problem.
User avatar
UTMCretin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,087
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 05, 2006
Location: Look happy, it's the end of the world

stating the relatively obvious 

Post#47 » by UTMCretin » Mon Jul 7, 2008 8:04 pm

Bingo. In the first post-lockout year, ratings and popularity were way down, and the following year, the NHL actually managed to set a record for the lowest primetime ratings NBC has ever received. And since ratings are a telling sign of popularity, there is no doubt in my mind that the lockout hurt the NHL in the short term. Even now, basking in the glow of a very strong Stanley Cup Finals, the NHL still hasn't quite regained its former stature (but its future looks a heck of a lot better than it did five years ago). And yet there can be no arguing that the lockout, or rather the results of the lockout, were entirely necessary for the continued success and eventual recovery of the NHL.


An excerpt from the first post-lockout season, showing both the short term drop-off as well as the greater potential for long-term success:
The big exception is television ratings -- a key revenue driver and measure of a sport's mass appeal -- which have gone from bad to worse. The NHL playoffs, mostly relegated to the Outdoor Life Network (OLN), a second-tier cable channel known for hunting and fishing programs and its Tour de France coverage, have barely registered with the American public. NBC's ratings aren't great, either.

"You look at the playoff [ratings] numbers, and they have been beaten pretty soundly by poker and bowling," said Paul Swangard, managing director of the Warsaw Sports Marketing Center at the University of Oregon. "But I don't think this year was ever about robust TV numbers. It was about the gate and about competitive balance. With an economic model that doesn't rely on television, they can make this league work long-term."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/04/AR2006060400897.html

Return to The General NHL Board


cron