Championship Formula

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Neal04
Junior
Posts: 332
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Location: Brampton, Ontario

Championship Formula 

Post#1 » by Neal04 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 8:17 pm

Even though it is a cliche but defence wins championships. Since the 2000 season all the champions have 3 things in common: a big man who can post up, a wing player who can create and good team defence, not great but good.

Here's a list of the champions since 2000 with their wing player, big man and opponents PPG and FG%.
2008 - KG, Pierce, 90.3, 41.9%
2007 - Duncan, Ginobili, 90.1, 44.3%
2006 - Shaq, Wade, 96.0, 44.0%
2005 - Duncan, Ginobili, 88.4, 42.6%
2004 - Rasheed(that's a bit of a stretch), Hamilton, 84.3, 41.3%
2003 - Duncan, Parker(not necessarily a wing player but he could create), 90.4, 42.7%
2002 - Shaq, Kobe, 94.1, 42.4%
2001 - Shaq, Kobe, 97.2, 43.8%
2000 - Shaq, Kobe, 92.3, 41.6%

Also another thing they all have in common is that they all had an imposing big man to anchor the defence. All those bigs I listed were the ones who anchored their teams defence. The only difference is that Ben was the defensive force for the 04 Pistons and not Sheed.

Those are what I personally believe to be the main elements in a championship team.
The Main Event
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,086
And1: 577
Joined: Apr 30, 2008
Location: Everwhere you've never been

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#2 » by The Main Event » Mon Jul 7, 2008 8:27 pm

Who are you working for ?! This stuff is supposed to be kept secret man.
"A particular shot or way of moving the ball can be a player's personal signature, but efficiency of performance is what wins the game for the team."
- Pat Riley
Kosar86
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,225
And1: 33
Joined: Jul 18, 2002

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#3 » by Kosar86 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 8:38 pm

looks like having at least 2 hall of famers also helps too.
legacyinthemakin89c
Veteran
Posts: 2,674
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 02, 2006

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#4 » by legacyinthemakin89c » Mon Jul 7, 2008 8:43 pm

Lol I like how the Detroit championship was a fluke to half the league, but they have the best defensive stats out of all of those teams.
Silk Wilkes
Banned User
Posts: 10,533
And1: 10
Joined: Aug 28, 2004
Location: In between a pimp and a hard place

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#5 » by Silk Wilkes » Mon Jul 7, 2008 8:54 pm

You also gotta know you're good, obviously. I mean you know you're so good that you can beat anyone. A lot of team say they can beat anyone but they know they don't actually believe it.
User avatar
Paydro70
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,805
And1: 225
Joined: Mar 23, 2007

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#6 » by Paydro70 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 8:56 pm

At the very least, you ought to work from a team's points allowed per possession, not just per game and opponent FG%. Doing that ignores 3pters and free throws, and pace. Plus just putting up the numbers doesn't tell you how good the team is relative to the league.

Year - Pts/100poss, rank
2008 - 98.9, 1st
2007 - 99.9, 2nd
2006 - 104.5, 9th
2005 - 98.8, 1st
2004 - 95.4, 2nd
2003 - 99.7, 3rd
2002 - 101.7, 7th
2001 - 104.8, 21st
2000 - 98.2, 1st
1999 - 95.0, 1st
1998 - 99.8, 3rd
1997 - 102.4, 4th
1996 - 101.8, 1st

Despite that list, I'd have to say the "defense wins championships" stuff is overblown. All of these teams were also great on offense, you can just as easily say "offense wins championships."

2008 - 110.2, 9th
2007 - 109.2, 5th
2006 - 108.7, 7th
2005 - 107.5, 8th
2004 - 102.0, 18th
2003 - 105.6, 7th
2002 - 109.4, 2nd
2001 - 108.4, 2nd
2000 - 107.3, 4th
1999 - 104.0, 11th
1998 - 107.7, 8th
1997 - 114.4, 1st
1996 - 115.2, 1st

So... of these 13 champions, only 3 haven't been in the top 10 in both offense AND defense. Four of the 13 have had better offense than defense, and one was equal (1996 bulls, #1 in both). Granted, more of these teams have been better at defense than offense, and there is only one team that did not have a top-10 defense (the 01-02 Lakers), but I really don't think that it's as big a deal as most people make it out to be. Champions are great teams, who both score AND defend.

These are also, of course, small sample sizes.
Image
Malinhion
Banned User
Posts: 10,071
And1: 3
Joined: Oct 03, 2006
Location: Holding a Players-Only Meeting

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#7 » by Malinhion » Mon Jul 7, 2008 9:08 pm

Rebounding, defense, post scoring, two superstars, veteran roleplayers.
User avatar
Neal04
Junior
Posts: 332
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Location: Brampton, Ontario

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#8 » by Neal04 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 9:11 pm

Paydro70 wrote:At the very least, you ought to work from a team's points allowed per possession, not just per game and opponent FG%. Doing that ignores 3pters and free throws, and pace. Plus just putting up the numbers doesn't tell you how good the team is relative to the league.

Year - Pts/100poss, rank
2008 - 98.9, 1st
2007 - 99.9, 2nd
2006 - 104.5, 9th
2005 - 98.8, 1st
2004 - 95.4, 2nd
2003 - 99.7, 3rd
2002 - 101.7, 7th
2001 - 104.8, 21st
2000 - 98.2, 1st
1999 - 95.0, 1st
1998 - 99.8, 3rd
1997 - 102.4, 4th
1996 - 101.8, 1st

Despite that list, I'd have to say the "defense wins championships" stuff is overblown. All of these teams were also great on offense, you can just as easily say "offense wins championships."

2008 - 110.2, 9th
2007 - 109.2, 5th
2006 - 108.7, 7th
2005 - 107.5, 8th
2004 - 102.0, 18th
2003 - 105.6, 7th
2002 - 109.4, 2nd
2001 - 108.4, 2nd
2000 - 107.3, 4th
1999 - 104.0, 11th
1998 - 107.7, 8th
1997 - 114.4, 1st
1996 - 115.2, 1st

So... of these 13 champions, only 3 haven't been in the top 10 in both offense AND defense. Four of the 13 have had better offense than defense, and one was equal (1996 bulls, #1 in both). Granted, more of these teams have been better at defense than offense, and there is only one team that did not have a top-10 defense (the 01-02 Lakers), but I really don't think that it's as big a deal as most people make it out to be. Champions are great teams, who both score AND defend.

These are also, of course, small sample sizes.


I was too lazy to go in depth about the defensive statistics but you make a valid point about the offence being as important. I never discounted the importance of offence though but I personally think defence is more important.

Although at the end of the day the object of the game is to put the ball in bucket and outscore your opponent.
User avatar
Paydro70
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,805
And1: 225
Joined: Mar 23, 2007

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#9 » by Paydro70 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 9:17 pm

Yeah... it is a pretty simple game, at base. Make use of your possessions, stop the other team from scoring on their possessions.

BTW, the Pistons are indeed the flukiest champion on the list, up there with the 2002 Lakers as the only teams to actually be below-average on one side of the ball.
Image
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,467
And1: 5,349
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#10 » by JordansBulls » Mon Jul 7, 2008 9:25 pm

Malinhion wrote:Rebounding, defense, post scoring, two superstars, veteran roleplayers.
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
User avatar
Paydro70
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,805
And1: 225
Joined: Mar 23, 2007

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#11 » by Paydro70 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 9:31 pm

Who was the post scorer for the Celtics? Perkins? And for the Bulls? Was it Sheed for the Pistons? These are just more cliches...
User avatar
Neal04
Junior
Posts: 332
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Location: Brampton, Ontario

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#12 » by Neal04 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 9:43 pm

Paydro70 wrote:Who was the post scorer for the Celtics? Perkins? And for the Bulls? Was it Sheed for the Pistons? These are just more cliches...


Not necessarily post scoring but a big man who can score and post up once in a while.
Bobbcats
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,951
And1: 487
Joined: Jan 22, 2006

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#13 » by Bobbcats » Mon Jul 7, 2008 10:25 pm

2003 - Duncan, Parker(not necessarily a wing player but he could create), Parker? 2003?
User avatar
Neal04
Junior
Posts: 332
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Location: Brampton, Ontario

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#14 » by Neal04 » Mon Jul 7, 2008 10:31 pm

Bobbcats wrote:2003 - Duncan, Parker(not necessarily a wing player but he could create), Parker? 2003?


Ginobili hadn't really established himself at the time and Parker was their starting point guard and second leading scorer for the Spurs. Although Parker was inconsistent throughout the playoffs.
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,889
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#15 » by pillwenney » Mon Jul 7, 2008 10:42 pm

The Pistons were no fluke, but they did go about it a different way.

I guess it kind of boils down to the idea that if you have a major advantage in one way, you can afford to be weaker in other ways. Sheed was never really that ideal of a post player, but their defense that year was absolutely dominant.
User avatar
realfung
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,960
And1: 44
Joined: May 22, 2007
 

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#16 » by realfung » Tue Jul 8, 2008 12:20 am

Detroit in 2004 was so good.....and without any superstars, they managed to win a championship.

They were playing Kobe, Shaq, Malone and Payton.
User avatar
RoyceDa59
RealGM
Posts: 24,262
And1: 9,174
Joined: Aug 25, 2002
         

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#17 » by RoyceDa59 » Tue Jul 8, 2008 12:39 am

Malinhion wrote:Rebounding, defense, post scoring, two superstars, veteran roleplayers.


, and shooters.
Go Raps!!
User avatar
Paydro70
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,805
And1: 225
Joined: Mar 23, 2007

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#18 » by Paydro70 » Tue Jul 8, 2008 2:16 am

mitchweber wrote:The Pistons were no fluke, but they did go about it a different way.

I guess it kind of boils down to the idea that if you have a major advantage in one way, you can afford to be weaker in other ways. Sheed was never really that ideal of a post player, but their defense that year was absolutely dominant.


Yes, an excellent point. Basketball has simultaneously only two components (scoring, stopping scoring), and dozens (ballhandling, rebounding, shooting, shot blocking, post scoring, etc. etc.). These things are of varying importance, and you can adjust in certain ways (maybe you're not so great at shooting if you have enough inside scoring). It's hard to be legitimately BAD at anything and still win, but ultimately there is no hard-and-fast RULE of how to win a championship.
Image
kevC
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 367
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#19 » by kevC » Tue Jul 8, 2008 2:49 am

Paydro70 wrote:BTW, the Pistons are indeed the flukiest champion on the list, up there with the 2002 Lakers as the only teams to actually be below-average on one side of the ball.


I wouldn't necessarily say they were fluky. The post-Sheed trade Pistons of that season were UNBELIEVABLE on defense and probably the greatest defensive team of this generation.
RockTHECasbah
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,526
And1: 10
Joined: Oct 05, 2007

Re: Championship Formula 

Post#20 » by RockTHECasbah » Tue Jul 8, 2008 2:49 am

Can someone pull up the point differential rankings for the champs?

thanks
Know anyone who is disabled? has an addiction?
Image
HandyTax - Your Canadian Disability Tax Credit Consultants
http://www.handytax.ca

Return to The General Board