Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million*

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Fort Minor
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,722
And1: 70
Joined: Sep 29, 2005
       

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#81 » by Fort Minor » Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:10 pm

jenn_gp wrote:
That Nicka wrote:lol there are some serious Buck haters on these boards...

I honestly didn't know he was playing that well. That's a bit of money..at least 12 million a year? For a dude I haven't heard jack squat about since he was drafted?

Maybe it's because I don't follow the Bucks, or that I live on the West Coast. But I honestly haven't heard much about Bogut in terms of his production the past few years.


You're suprised by this? Michael Redd could be scoring 28 ppg with 8 rebounds and 8 assists, and NOBODY on either coasts would hear a thing about it, because of how the media is biased towards the the New Yorks and LAs. That's the work of ESPN and other major sports outlets. Not that I can blame them, because they make the most money that way, but just because you don't hear about a player on a team located somewhere in the midwest doesn't mean they're playing poorly.
Another Brick in the Wall
Senior
Posts: 556
And1: 3
Joined: Oct 10, 2006

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#82 » by Another Brick in the Wall » Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:27 pm

Not always true.. LeBron is stalked by the media despite playing for a non-marquee franchise in Cleveland.

Spurs and Jazz play in relatively, small markets, but they're good so we hear about them.

If Bucks were good or they actually had a player worth talking about, they would be talked about.
jenn_gp
Head Coach
Posts: 6,629
And1: 6
Joined: Apr 11, 2003

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#83 » by jenn_gp » Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:45 pm

Fort Minor wrote:
jenn_gp wrote:
That Nicka wrote:lol there are some serious Buck haters on these boards...

I honestly didn't know he was playing that well. That's a bit of money..at least 12 million a year? For a dude I haven't heard jack squat about since he was drafted?

Maybe it's because I don't follow the Bucks, or that I live on the West Coast. But I honestly haven't heard much about Bogut in terms of his production the past few years.


You're suprised by this? Michael Redd could be scoring 28 ppg with 8 rebounds and 8 assists, and NOBODY on either coasts would hear a thing about it, because of how the media is biased towards the the New Yorks and LAs. That's the work of ESPN and other major sports outlets. Not that I can blame them, because they make the most money that way, but just because you don't hear about a player on a team located somewhere in the midwest doesn't mean they're playing poorly.

I never said he was playing poorly. In fact I said I didn't know he was playing that well to earn that kind of contract.
GameTime_3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,480
And1: 4,051
Joined: Sep 20, 2004
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#84 » by GameTime_3 » Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:48 pm

I want Boguts Agent, i could easily find myself on a nba roster making the minium. Wow, 72 million for bogut! This is how teams get killed long term.
User avatar
BobbyLight
RealGM
Posts: 10,027
And1: 1,546
Joined: Jul 29, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Contact:
 

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#85 » by BobbyLight » Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:59 pm

GameTime_3 wrote:I want Boguts Agent, i could easily find myself on a nba roster making the minium. Wow, 72 million for bogut! This is how teams get killed long term.


After a while I just want to bang my head on a table Gordon Ramsey style... It's 60 guranteed. It only goes up to 72 if he does things like help his team win or becomes an all star. You know, being a good basketball player.

I actually wish more and more NBA contracts would be incentive based. The gurnateed money in the NBA can, at times, create a lazy player. But if you signed a player and said they could make 10 to 20% more, I'd think you could get more effort out of certain players motivated by that sort of thing.
User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,555
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#86 » by Buck You » Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:44 pm

Induveca wrote:I think they overpaid for the guy. I like him, but he's not worth that dough.

Redd/Jefferson/Bogut will never win anything.

Thanks Nostradamus, how many games will the Bucks win this year?

Bogut is a top 5 center in the league, at worst top 6. (If you count Amare as a center). You are going to have to overpay for a player who is the top 5 or 6 at his position in the league. This is a fair deal.
User avatar
Chapter29
RealGM
Posts: 14,593
And1: 1,235
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
   

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#87 » by Chapter29 » Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:52 pm

Induveca wrote:I think they overpaid for the guy. I like him, but he's not worth that dough.

Redd/Jefferson/Bogut will never win anything.


And the Knicks for example (I assume you're a Knicks fan) with their 100M dollar payroll will win what exactly? It could be argued that those 3 are better than any Knicks player.

And I by no means dislike the Knicks or hope they lose or anything its just that they have been very poorly managed the last couple of years.
Giannis
is
UponUs
User avatar
Awoooga
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,964
And1: 20
Joined: Apr 07, 2003

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#88 » by Awoooga » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:31 am

Stop whining Bucks fans. Your team BADLY overpaid Bogut even at 60 million, he is worth 7-8 million a year, I do not care where he was picked, I would sooner let him walk then shell out that kind of coin for Bogut.

Now the question is how badly was he overpaid?

If Bogut does not hit any incentives and the deal is 60/5 it is bad but he remains the second worst contract on the team (Redd).

To answer this question we need to know what the incentives are tied into. Bucks fans care to share what the incentives are so we can determine how likely or unlikely Bogut is to get over 60 million?
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#89 » by skones » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:50 am

Awoooga wrote:Stop whining Bucks fans. Your team BADLY overpaid Bogut even at 60 million, he is worth 7-8 million a year, I do not care where he was picked, I would sooner let him walk then shell out that kind of coin for Bogut.

Now the question is how badly was he overpaid?

If Bogut does not hit any incentives and the deal is 60/5 it is bad but he remains the second worst contract on the team (Redd).

To answer this question we need to know what the incentives are tied into. Bucks fans care to share what the incentives are so we can determine how likely or unlikely Bogut is to get over 60 million?


You're an idiot. I mean, 23 year old centers that put up 14 and 10 obviously grow on trees. You show me a 23 year old center who puts up 14 and 10 signed to 35-40 million and I'll show you a player with a mentally deficient agent and a genius as a general manager.

IF Bogut ends up making all 72.5 million then I would guess that the guy is one of the best centers in the league MAKING HIM WORTH IT.
User avatar
Awoooga
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,964
And1: 20
Joined: Apr 07, 2003

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#90 » by Awoooga » Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:09 am

I appreciate the kind words :lol:

I know you might be sensitive about this being that you are a Bucks fan and have no choice but to accept it but you need to accept that this is a terrible signing that will haunt your team for the next few years.

Why?

Because Bogut is NOT WORTH 60-72 Million. He put up decent numbers on a garbage team last year. His stats mean nothing to me, I have seen him play 10+ times and he is a solid role player, and he should be paid like one, not like a star player.

I have nothing invested in this, I would prefer to see teams spend wisely but if you guys think that Bogut is worth this deal kudos to you. Bogut might as well of had a no trade clause because no one will touch this deal.

If the contract goes up to 72 million, Bogut will compete with the Rashard Lewis's of the world for the worst contract in the league.

So again I ask, what are the incentives. I want to see how likely Bogut is to reach them and how bad this contract really is.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#91 » by skones » Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:25 am

Awoooga wrote:I appreciate the kind words :lol:

I know you might be sensitive about this being that you are a Bucks fan and have no choice but to accept it but you need to accept that this is a terrible signing that will haunt your team for the next few years.

Why?

Because Bogut is NOT WORTH 60-72 Million. He put up decent numbers on a garbage team last year. His stats mean nothing to me, I have seen him play 10+ times and he is a solid role player, and he should be paid like one, not like a star player.

I have nothing invested in this, I would prefer to see teams spend wisely but if you guys think that Bogut is worth this deal kudos to you. Bogut might as well of had a no trade clause because no one will touch this deal.

If the contract goes up to 72 million, Bogut will compete with the Rashard Lewis's of the world for the worst contract in the league.

So again I ask, what are the incentives. I want to see how likely Bogut is to reach them and how bad this contract really is.


Nobody knows the incentives.

If you think ANYONE would have gotten Bogut for less than 60 million you are sorely mistaken. Chris Kaman got 52 million two offseasons ago (Since then the cap number has gone up) after a 12 and 10 season on 52% shooting. Is Chris Kaman overpaid? Nope.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#92 » by Bernman » Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:27 am

Bogut is better than Dalembert right now. He had a +1.5 own-opponent PER differential to Dalembert's +.6. And PER doesn't even include charges taken (which are essentially steals), a category in which Bogut has ranked 3rd, 3rd, and 2nd in the last 3 seasons, respectively. Bogut is the far superior passer, as the 2.6 apg v. .5 apg would indicate. As a result, Bogut's making a lot more passes which lead to the pass which scores the basketball, which is also not part of the PER equation. Also, Bogut plays with a couple ball hogging guards in Mo Williams and Michael Redd, while Dalembert plays alongside players who've always had reps as fantastic passers for their position like Dre Miller and Iggy. So PER would be a statistic that even cheats a guy like Bogut.

In addition to being appreciably better than Dalembert now, he projects to be far superior to him in the future. Bogut is still only 23, while Dalembert is 27. We saw Bogut improving the last 4 months of the season to a 16/10/3/2 guy. And Bogut inexplicably hasn't translated skills he's exhibited in other leagues like shooting. Via DX from January of '05: "He has a very nice shooting stroke with a high release that makes it very hard to block, and range all the way out to the three point line. His mid-range game is quite solid, he can put the ball on the floor and take it all the way to the basket, find the open man with the drive and dish, or pull up and nail the 14 footer.". He hasn't shown the ability to hit jump shots whatsoever at the NBA level. And you can't blame the defense when over half the time he's wide open and his free throw percentages have sharply declined as well. He has shot 59.6 % from the free throw line in the NBA, in comparison to 67.2 in college. 36 % from 3 in college. If he can finally shoot a jumper like he's proven, he can set up drives with his plus ball-handling, and become a modern day version of Jack Sikma.

Dalembert isn't on Bogut's level. In today's market Dalembert's 10 million per contract would be worth around 12. The Bucks were not foolish to give Bogut 5/60.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#93 » by skones » Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:28 am

I should probably rephrase that to, WAS Chris Kaman overpaid upon signing that extension. The answer is no IMO.
User avatar
BrewCityBBQ
Analyst
Posts: 3,107
And1: 79
Joined: Jul 21, 2004
Location: Zombie Dust
     

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#94 » by BrewCityBBQ » Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:25 am

How can someone in the age of the Internet honestly not know anything about Bogut other then he was drafted #1? I mean the guy high-fived himself. Thats worth the extra 2.5 mil per year in bonuses itself.
User avatar
Chapter29
RealGM
Posts: 14,593
And1: 1,235
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Location: Wauwatosa, WI
   

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#95 » by Chapter29 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:26 am

Awoooga wrote:Stop whining Bucks fans. Your team BADLY overpaid Bogut even at 60 million, he is worth 7-8 million a year, I do not care where he was picked, I would sooner let him walk then shell out that kind of coin for Bogut.

Now the question is how badly was he overpaid?

If Bogut does not hit any incentives and the deal is 60/5 it is bad but he remains the second worst contract on the team (Redd).

To answer this question we need to know what the incentives are tied into. Bucks fans care to share what the incentives are so we can determine how likely or unlikely Bogut is to get over 60 million?


Whining??

I am thrilled we signed him.

You just need to watch a little more basketball if that's your opinion.
Giannis
is
UponUs
User avatar
ITK9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,554
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
     

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#96 » by ITK9 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:54 am

Guy986 wrote:That's the going rate for above average cetners nowadays. He's better than Dalembert so i think he's getting paid fair here.


no, he is not.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,422
And1: 8,030
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#97 » by Mags FTW » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:14 pm

IMO Dalembert is the better defender, they are about even on the glass, and Bogut is better offensively (both scoring and passing).


They are about even right now, but if you look ahead I'd pay more for Bogut because he's 3.5 years younger and made quite an improvement last year.
User avatar
BobbyLight
RealGM
Posts: 10,027
And1: 1,546
Joined: Jul 29, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Contact:
 

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#98 » by BobbyLight » Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:28 pm

ITK9 wrote:
Guy986 wrote:That's the going rate for above average cetners nowadays. He's better than Dalembert so i think he's getting paid fair here.


no, he is not.


So you must have missed that whole statistical analysis that more or less proved Bogut is the better player. Or did you choose to ignore that?
ropjhk
RealGM
Posts: 19,468
And1: 12,600
Joined: Jul 09, 2002
     

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#99 » by ropjhk » Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:46 pm

For those who think the Bucks didn't overpay...

When at least 50% of the people who have an opinion about a player thinks he's overpaid, then he's overpaid. What a team pays a player shouldn't be about what that team is willing to pay, but what other teams are willing to pay.

And yes, most players in the NBA are overpaid.

So rather than asking what other 14 and 10 players are only making 8-9 million a year, the Bucks should ask themselves what other teams are willing to pay Bogut 12-14 million a year.
ropjhk
RealGM
Posts: 19,468
And1: 12,600
Joined: Jul 09, 2002
     

Re: Bucks resign Bogut: 5 years, 60/72.5 million* 

Post#100 » by ropjhk » Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:47 pm

And for those making comparisons with Dalembert, realize that Dalembert is well overpaid. The 76ers essentially outbid themselves to keep him.

Return to The General Board