ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Artest Everything Thread

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,891
And1: 2,604
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#81 » by pillwenney » Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:55 am

what would jack bauer do? wrote:Artest is a blackhole/ballstopper. Lamar is a chemistry guy that grabs 10+ rebounds a game and knows how to pass the ball. Every team that Artest goes to has internal problems that eventually lead to them not making the playoffs. The Lakers are much better suited going after a good locker room presence like Prince with Odom/Farmar/future 1st. You guys are smart for not offering Artest a huge contract and just letting him expire next year. No doubt Artest has better ability to play and defend at SF, but I don't think anyone in their right mind would trade for him other than the Lakers- especially after his antics this summer, last summer, the year before, and the year before that. He would fit with the Lakers offense because he wouldn't have to be a ballstopper in LA and he'd work in with Kobe and Phil. I mean it might make both teams better, but why in the world would the Lakers want to give Odom to Sactown? As former "rivals", we would probably want you guys to be stuck with Jason Thompson, Kenny Thomas, Mikki Moore, Shelden Williams, and SAR. Besides you guys are clearly in rebuild mode. It might be best if the Kings just let him walk or trade him for a future 1st.


Ron's "ballstopping" is the most overblown thing on RealGM since "lawl Webber callz timeout he is choker lawl!" At least now. A very high percentage of Ron's shots this year were on plays designed to isolate him. This was clear.

But of course, that's not nearly as absurd as suggesting that the Kings haven't made the playoffs because of Ron and any kind of locker room problems that he has created (he hasn't created any really at all). The Kings were +.500 last year with Ron, and the last time we made the playoffs, Ron deserved most of the credit.
SacKingZZZ wrote:No, where Ron is at as a player he doesn't fit the direction we are headed. You can't just tell Ron to, "go to the corner and wait for the ball", or, "look for a place to cut and we'll get you the ball." He wants to be Kobe Bryant or TMac on offense. That type of player has no place on this squad. He isn't at that level offensively, and never will be. All around he is a tremendous player but he doesn't fit and it's painfully obvious.

SacKingZZZ wrote:No, where Ron is at as a player he doesn't fit the direction we are headed. You can't just tell Ron to, "go to the corner and wait for the ball", or, "look for a place to cut and we'll get you the ball." He wants to be Kobe Bryant or TMac on offense. That type of player has no place on this squad. He isn't at that level offensively, and never will be. All around he is a tremendous player but he doesn't fit and it's painfully obvious.



I'm glad that we're inside Ron's brain here. It's not like Theus was constantly calling plays to get Ron isos last year, right? No, I'm sure Ron just wanted to be the star.

And you can talk all you want about Geoff going after some types of players that could fit into a Princeton type offense, but the fact of the matter is that you can't run an offense that your coach doesn't really know. I mean he can learn it to a certain extent, but you can't build your team around an offensive system unless the staff really, really knows it. The only two teams that I can think of that were really built around a specific offensive system recently were the Lakers with the triangle and the Kings with the Princeton--and both teams had guys on the bench who literally invented the offenses.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#82 » by SacKingZZZ » Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:21 am

mitchweber wrote:
I'm glad that we're inside Ron's brain here. It's not like Theus was constantly calling plays to get Ron isos last year, right? No, I'm sure Ron just wanted to be the star.

And you can talk all you want about Geoff going after some types of players that could fit into a Princeton type offense, but the fact of the matter is that you can't run an offense that your coach doesn't really know. I mean he can learn it to a certain extent, but you can't build your team around an offensive system unless the staff really, really knows it. The only two teams that I can think of that were really built around a specific offensive system recently were the Lakers with the triangle and the Kings with the Princeton--and both teams had guys on the bench who literally invented the offenses.



Do you ever listen to what Ron says??? I know a lot of people take what he says for granted but the guy typically means what he says. Almost like a drunken tirade, there is usually some truth in their somewhere. He on more than one occasion has said and has been very adament about placing himself in the same position and level of a Kobe Bryant, TMac, etc. and feels that is the type of player he is and therefore should be put in the same positions on the floor. Don't need to be a mind reader when someone flat out tells you time and time again. No, it's not about mind reading here, in your case it's about that river over in Egypt.

If Reggie is any kind of coach he knows the Princeton already to some degree and the sets run within it, and I would be surprised if he didn't. It's basic principals have become common place on just about every team both in college and the NBA. In reality it's one of the easiest systems to run, the trick is having the players to work within it. We have a pretty good start so far. I see us running a lot of pick and roll, pick and pop, and basic motion offense overall. We won't run a pure Princeton where every play is called or diagrammed, we never did anyway. It's just basically a philosophy, which Theus has stated several times before that he wants to instill, where they are looking for the open man or best shot at all times. Making that extra pass. Duh, what coach doesn't want that? Martin already knows it back to front and actually asked both Eric Musselman and Theus to put in playsets for him. Since he most likely is our main weapon in that system, it sounds like a plan to me. Another thing to remember is that Reggie played under Jerry Sloan, who also happens to be Reggies role model as far as coaching is concerned. And what kind of offense does Jerry like to run??? That's right kiddies, motion offense, back cuts, pick and roll/pop, etc. So....
damadmonk
Senior
Posts: 602
And1: 24
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#83 » by damadmonk » Sat Jul 12, 2008 5:18 pm

Would this trade make sense for the Kings?

Ron Artest
Shareef Abdur-Rahim

for

Andrea Bargnani
Anthony Parker
Joey Graham

Get $7 million in expiring contracts with a potential next Dirk to rid the Kings of Artest and SAR contract. Seems like it would be a fit for both teams.
Alex_De_Large
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,718
And1: 45
Joined: May 05, 2007

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#84 » by Alex_De_Large » Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:33 pm

Trades i think can be made for Artest and makes sense.


Raptors:
Graham + Bargnani + a future second pick.
http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.ph ... id=4719976

Udrih / Salmons
Kmart / F. Garcia / Salmons
F. Garcia / Shelden W. / Graham
Bargnani / Moore / Shelden W.
B. Miller / Hawes

problem: no backup pg.



Suns:
Diaw + Barbosa for Salmons/AbdurRahim.
http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.ph ... id=4719995

Udrih / Barbosa
Kmart / Barbosa / F. Garcia /
F. Garcia / Shelden W. / Graham
Diaw / Moore / Shelden W.
B. Miller / Hawes

problem: diaw big contract. it's 3 years more.



Rockets:
Jackson(expiring) + Brooks + Greene + Novak for Douby
http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.ph ... id=4720007

Udrih / Brooks
Kmart / Salmons
F. Garcia / Greene / Novak
Shelden W. / Moore
B. Miller / Hawes

problem: Head should also be included in the deal, but i can't put it on.




Lakers:
http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.ph ... id=4720013
Ariza + Walton + Farmar for Douby

Udrih / Farmar
Kmart / F.Garcia
Walton / Ariza / Salmons
Shelden W. / Moore
B. Miller / Hawes

problem: the Lakers giving too much young talent? but why would the Kings help the Lakers trading Odom for Artest? sure giving up kenny thomas ugly contract helps, but why help them? the Kings don't care about having odom or artest next year.



Knicks:
Marbury (expiring) + Chandler + Lee for Salmons, Kenny Thomas, Douby
http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.ph ... id=4720024
http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.ph ... id=4720024

Udrih / Marbury
Kmart / F.Garcia
F. Garcia / Chandler
Lee / Shelden W. / Moore
B. Miller / Hawes

problem: i don't think the Knicks were dumb enough to do this.




Cavs:
Gibson (S&T) + Eric Snow (expiring) for Salmons

Udrih / Gibson / Snow
Kmart / / Gibson / F. Garcia
F. Garcia / Shelden W.
Moore / Shelden W.
B. Miller / Hawes

problem: not a lot of depth.
THE DAGGER
Sophomore
Posts: 151
And1: 6
Joined: Feb 14, 2006

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#85 » by THE DAGGER » Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:02 pm

Being that most of you guys are from Sacramento, I'm surprised this little bombshell got past you.

In an interview conducted on 7/8 with the rise guys, Kings beat writer, Sam Amick, said this:

...a lower member of the Buss family basically told Mitch to get it done


The topic was Artest to the Lakers.

You can listen to the full interview here:http://www.sports1140.com/pages/1932257.php

Recent interviews are on the left, scroll down and click on "Sam Amick 7/8"
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,437
And1: 5,538
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#86 » by KF10 » Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:40 pm

Not really an update but kinda interesting.

I have no update as yet on the one-sided Lakers-Kings talks reported on Thursday, but keep an eye on Ronny Turiaf's situation while the waiting game continues.

The Lakers forward has accepted a four-year, $17 million offer sheet from Golden State and the Lakers have seven days to match it. It seems inconceivable that they will and it's to the Kings' advantage if they don't.

If they are to convince the Lakers to take back forward Kenny Thomas in a deal in which Artest would be LA-bound and Lamar Odom would come to Sacramento, they need Turiaf to head for the Bay Area. The Lakers are already near the luxury tax and not looking to go any further, and they may buy into the logic that Thomas - who turns 31 on July 25 - could provide quality defensive-minded minutes off the bench just like Turiaf did.

With the chance to get out of Sacramento and his invisible existence, Thomas may even do a few dances courtside like the jovial Turiaf has been known for. Thomas is owed approximately $18 over the next two seasons, so the lump sum is about equal with Turiaf's offer sheet (albeit in two less seasons). It's the price of doing business if they want to acquire the underpaid Artest ($7.4 million).

Meanwhile, the many who can't envision a Lakers-Kings blockbuster trade of any kind have a valid point. It would go against the NBA grain, but it should be said that any and all theories that the Maloofs simply wouldn't let it happen couldn't be further from the truth. They will pull the trigger if they get what they want.

If not, they'll hope to make something happen with someone else. Among the teams I've been told to keep a serious eye on in the Artest sweepstakes: Dallas, Miami, Phoenix, San Antonio and maybe even Charlotte. I often wonder about Toronto as well, but have yet to hear anything substantial on that front.


http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/sports/kings/
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#87 » by KingInExile » Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:48 pm

THE DAGGER wrote:Being that most of you guys are from Sacramento, I'm surprised this little bombshell got past you.

In an interview conducted on 7/8 with the rise guys, Kings beat writer, Sam Amick, said this:

...a lower member of the Buss family basically told Mitch to get it done


The topic was Artest to the Lakers.

You can listen to the full interview here:http://www.sports1140.com/pages/1932257.php

Recent interviews are on the left, scroll down and click on "Sam Amick 7/8"

What exactly is a "bombshell" in this? The fact that the Lakers are interested? Well that's what 99.9999% of this thread is about, so there's no "bombshell" there. Or are you saying that someone from the Buss family is telling Cupcake what to do is the "bombshell"? Well it certainly ain't the first time they have told him what to do, so that's not much of a "bombshell".

Or are you trying to imply that just because someone from the Buss family is telling Cupcake to "get it done" means that the deal is going to go through? Well, that might be the mindset that they are approaching this with. But just the fact that the Laker's want it, don't mean that it will be so. Petrie is not going to pull the trigger on a deal just because the "Lakers want the deal"...news flash for you, he doesn't work for the Lakers. Petrie will pull the trigger on a deal IF it makes sense for the Kings and will stand to improve the team long-term. He's also not going to pull the trigger on a deal unless he's got a good sense that it is the best deal that can be made (so far the Artest/Odom ideas probably aren't the best). The only thing "encouraging" about that quote is that Petrie could use information like that to drive up the price for whoever wants to bid on Ron. That just puts Petrie more firmly in the driver's seat.
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#88 » by rsavaj » Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:52 pm

Alex_De_Large wrote:Suns:
Diaw + Barbosa for Salmons/AbdurRahim/Artest.
http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.ph ... id=4719995

Udrih / Barbosa
Kmart / Barbosa / F. Garcia /
F. Garcia / Shelden W. / Graham
Diaw / Moore / Shelden W.
B. Miller / Hawes

problem: diaw big contract. it's 3 years more.



Phoenix would jump on that trade without hesitating if it was offered, so why would SAC help improve a division rival?
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,437
And1: 5,538
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#89 » by KF10 » Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:58 pm

rsavaj wrote:
Alex_De_Large wrote:Suns:
Diaw + Barbosa for Salmons/AbdurRahim/Artest.
http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.ph ... id=4719995

Udrih / Barbosa
Kmart / Barbosa / F. Garcia /
F. Garcia / Shelden W. / Graham
Diaw / Moore / Shelden W.
B. Miller / Hawes

problem: diaw big contract. it's 3 years more.



Phoenix would jump on that trade without hesitating if it was offered, so why would SAC help improve a division rival?


We don't. That is a horrible deal for the Kings. Besides most of his trades (I'm not sure if he is a Kings fan or not) are horrible and not ideal for the Kings anyways.
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#90 » by KingInExile » Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:01 pm

rsavaj wrote:
Alex_De_Large wrote:Suns:
Diaw + Barbosa for Salmons/AbdurRahim/Artest.
http://www.realgm.com/src_checktrade.ph ... id=4719995

Udrih / Barbosa
Kmart / Barbosa / F. Garcia /
F. Garcia / Shelden W. / Graham
Diaw / Moore / Shelden W.
B. Miller / Hawes

problem: diaw big contract. it's 3 years more.



Phoenix would jump on that trade without hesitating if it was offered, so why would SAC help improve a division rival?

No doubt the Suns would jump on that...I have no clue why Petrie would offer it, though. We give up an expiring deal, a soon-to-be-expiring deal and a budget wing player for 2 long-term deals. Makes no sense for a rebuilding team. I wouldn't mind Barbosa, but it's better for use to let Singletary develop...besides, Salmons can fill a similar to what LB would. And we just have no need at all for Diaw.
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
rpa
RealGM
Posts: 15,084
And1: 7,901
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#91 » by rpa » Sat Jul 12, 2008 10:09 pm

Alex_De_Large wrote:Trades i think can be made for Artest and makes sense.


FYI: your trades suck.

The ones with the Lakers & Cavs are beyond laughable. Especially the parts where you say the Lakers are giving up too much young talent (yeah, a backup PG and 3rd string wing is too much young talent) and where you say Walton starts over Salmons and Ariza backs him up while Salmons plays the 3rd wing despite the fact that both those guys couldn't hold Salmons' jock.
Alex_De_Large
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,718
And1: 45
Joined: May 05, 2007

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#92 » by Alex_De_Large » Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:55 am

LOL yeah, the Lakers will give Kobe Bryant for the Artest expiring.
Ariza/Walton/Farmar is not enough, basically the 3 best young players they have without including Bynum.
rpa
RealGM
Posts: 15,084
And1: 7,901
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#93 » by rpa » Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:42 am

Alex_De_Large wrote:LOL yeah, the Lakers will give Kobe Bryant for the Artest expiring.
Ariza/Walton/Farmar is not enough, basically the 3 best young players they have without including Bynum.


Walton = 3rd string SF with 5 more years left on a **** contract
Ariza = 3rd string SF
Farmar = backup PG

who cares if it's their 3 best young players (w/o Bynum), none of them are that good.
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#94 » by KingInExile » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:59 am

Alex_De_Large wrote:LOL yeah, the Lakers will give Kobe Bryant for the Artest expiring.
Ariza/Walton/Farmar is not enough, basically the 3 best young players they have without including Bynum.

No need to exaggerate.

Frankly, it is becoming more and more clear that you don't really understand the value Artest currently has or know what the Kings needs are. All of your ideas basically just look like a random trade-checker experiment gone bad, and now you're stretching to try to justify them. I recommend just giving up now before this gets out of hand.
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
tlifeset
Pro Prospect
Posts: 893
And1: 92
Joined: May 24, 2005
Location: Laguna Beach, CA

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#95 » by tlifeset » Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:31 am

Um, you have a Spencer Hawes banner and you're worried about it getting out of hand?

Subjective much?

The deal is Artest and Thomas for Odom and a future pick. That's the deal. There is no other deal. Nothing else makes any sense. The Kings aren't anywhere near the playoffs with their talented young core and they need to dump salary--see the Mike Bibby trade. But they need value back--that comes from the pick and losing Kenny's salary. Then you turn around and trade Brad Miller to the desperate Cavs for Wally Z.

Man, I'm like the new Petrie. Newtrie.
BMiller52
RealGM
Posts: 10,403
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: my house

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#96 » by BMiller52 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:48 am

tlifeset wrote:Um, you have a Spencer Hawes banner and you're worried about it getting out of hand?

Subjective much?

The deal is Artest and Thomas for Odom and a future pick. That's the deal. There is no other deal. Nothing else makes any sense. The Kings aren't anywhere near the playoffs with their talented young core and they need to dump salary--see the Mike Bibby trade. But they need value back--that comes from the pick and losing Kenny's salary. Then you turn around and trade Brad Miller to the desperate Cavs for Wally Z.

Man, I'm like the new Petrie. Newtrie.



Newtrie's actually a pretty good name :)

I donno, I think I might do the Artest/Kenny for Odom/1st deal. It gives us more flexibility and if we play our cards right we can hit FA next year instead of 2010, and there are fewer teams with cap space in 2009. THe 1st will probably be similar to an early 2nd, but you can even find value there. Arthur was the 27th pick this year, and he has looked pretty good so far in the summer league. I dunno. I'm iffy on it but I might do it.
Image
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,437
And1: 5,538
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#97 » by KF10 » Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:52 am

I never heard a a future pick is involved in the Odom deal. Link?
rpa
RealGM
Posts: 15,084
And1: 7,901
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#98 » by rpa » Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:18 am

tlifeset wrote:Um, you have a Spencer Hawes banner and you're worried about it getting out of hand?

Subjective much?

The deal is Artest and Thomas for Odom and a future pick. That's the deal. There is no other deal. Nothing else makes any sense. The Kings aren't anywhere near the playoffs with their talented young core and they need to dump salary--see the Mike Bibby trade. But they need value back--that comes from the pick and losing Kenny's salary. Then you turn around and trade Brad Miller to the desperate Cavs for Wally Z.

Man, I'm like the new Petrie. Newtrie.


1) The Lakers can't trade a 1st rounder until 2012
2) The Kings dumped Bibby for mostly expiring contracts so that they could keep Beno while staying under the luxury tax threshold.
3) Dumping Thomas' salary doesn't help the Kings. They're shooting for 2010 cap space and Thomas' deal expires in 2010.
4) Since the Kings aren't "anywhere near the playoffs" why would they want to pay a premium for Odom's talent? He's not being handled as a pure expiring contract in this sense and the Kings sure as hell don't need the talent he brings to the table. So why not go dump Kenny & Ron to someone like the Cavs for scrub expiring contracts and a better sweetener? At that point there's no premium paid for Odom.
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#99 » by KingInExile » Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:12 pm

tlifeset wrote:Um, you have a Spencer Hawes banner and you're worried about it getting out of hand?

Subjective much?

The deal is Artest and Thomas for Odom and a future pick. That's the deal. There is no other deal. Nothing else makes any sense. The Kings aren't anywhere near the playoffs with their talented young core and they need to dump salary--see the Mike Bibby trade. But they need value back--that comes from the pick and losing Kenny's salary. Then you turn around and trade Brad Miller to the desperate Cavs for Wally Z.

Man, I'm like the new Petrie. Newtrie.

Uhh...thanks for contributing nothing of substance.
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
SacTown Kings
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,880
And1: 190
Joined: May 12, 2003

Re: Official Artest Everything Thread 

Post#100 » by SacTown Kings » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:34 pm

LOL @ these trades by Laker fans, they are starting to become more delusional than Knick fans. The Lakers have offered Odom like 2 or 3 times now and Petrie has not pulled the trigger. I think it is pretty clear the Laker's aren't getting Bill, so please Laker fans stop your ridiculous "we'll give you a bunch of crap that won't help your team, for a DPOY all star in Bill". It's not gonna happen. You guys lost to the Celtics and you will lose again because you have no perimeter defense. You guys can't stop a one legged gimpy Pierce.

Return to Sacramento Kings