bonsaiflipflops wrote:
Well, it's interesting that Ainge has made it a point to say that Pierce was the best perimeter defender this season and/or during the playoffs with Tony Allen second and Posey third. Then he'd said, Tony's a better defender I guess overall to Posey. It sounds as if Ainge is somewhat downplaying the lost of Posey. I don't doubt he made the right decision, financially speaking. But, it'll be a tough sell to convince Boston fans that Tony and House more or less equal (or replaces) Posey. I know that isn't what Ainge is trying to say or do by resigning those two players. But, it's tough not to feel some concern with the lack of a back up small forward and Ainge coming out and saying that he won't look to replace Posey or basically fill-in the vacancy at that position. It'll be a group effort, to say the least. Hence, why I wonder if it'll be Walker who gets minutes next season and not Giddens so much.
I think this season is different than last, the team is different, and a 1-2-1 replacement for Posey isn't needed, which is great because at this point it's not possible.
Posey sucked up a lot of minutes because of small ball, and Perk, Powe, and Davis can certainly consume some of that. Personally, I hate lineups where a bunch of guys are standing around the 3 point line firing up shots. With KG playing just inside the line, we ended up with 3 3 point shooters, 1 long bomb 2 shooter, and Rondo, who didn't want to shoot. If Posey is the end of small ball, thats a small cost to bear in my mind.
A lot is being made of Poseys 3 point shooting. Yes, he hit some timely 3's, but lets not forget that he rarely did anything except shoot a 3, and Powe, House and Tony Allen were all more effective scorers given equal minutes. Posey and Perk played the same minutes, and Posey was only half a point better average than Perk, who I don't think anyone would consider to be much of an offensive threat. And hey, don't you think Rondo will be shooting the J more this year?
I'd like to see more depth at SF, because I think an injury to Pierce would be quite troublesome. Posey would have been nice if affordable, but a different replacement is fine, and he doesn't need to do exactly the same thing as Posey.
Perhaps one reason Ainge hasn't pulled the trigger on a new SF, is because of the inevitable "The Celtics have replaced Posey with xxxxx". That's an unfair comparison for anyone coming in, because I don't think that at this point (with O'Bryant, Giddens, Walker, House, TA being added since JP declined his option) that a James Posey clone is needed. It's a different team, the remaining need isn't necessarily exactly the same IMO.