
NFL Network Reports Randy Moss will be a Patriot
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
NFL Network Reports Randy Moss will be a Patriot
- SugarRay34
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,914
- And1: 11
- Joined: Oct 10, 2003
- Location: cappingthegame.com
NFL Network Reports Randy Moss will be a Patriot
NOOOO! Adam Schefter reported that the Patriots have offered a 2nd day pick but Al Davis said no however the Patriots are a team he said that Randy Moss would restruture his contract for. He didnt mention any other teams.If true this sucks and is a horrible start to the weekend. He said Moss whole key is to win a superbowl and he thinks he can put the Pats back on top. 

Re: NFL Network Reports Randy Moss will be a Patriot
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,654
- And1: 43
- Joined: Jun 28, 2006
Re: NFL Network Reports Randy Moss will be a Patriot
SugarRay34 wrote:NOOOO! Adam Schefter reported that the Patriots have offered a 2nd day pick but Al Davis said no however the Patriots are the only team he said that Randy Moss would restruture his contract for. If true this sucks and is a horrible start to the weekend. He said Moss whole key is to win a superbowl and he thinks he can put the Pats back on top.
He did not say they are the ONLY team he would restructure for...and he did not say he WILL be a Patriot. He did imply that he thought they were the leader, for your above mentioned reasons.
Re: NFL Network Reports Randy Moss will be a Patriot
- Fort Minor
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,722
- And1: 70
- Joined: Sep 29, 2005
-
Re: NFL Network Reports Randy Moss will be a Patriot
mnstinks wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
He did not say they are the ONLY team he would restructure for...and he did not say he WILL be a Patriot. He did imply that he thought they were the leader, for your above mentioned reasons.
Well if this is true, SR, you seriously have some "restructuring" of your own to do, regarding the content of your post.
BuckPack wrote:People still listen to Gery?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,654
- And1: 43
- Joined: Jun 28, 2006
DigitalFool wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
He broke Woodson last year and JW draft day trade.
I know he said they would resign Barnett, but I guess that isn't anything special.
I think 'again' is an appropriate term.
Woodson's signing was all over the media sites last year.
Barnett was obvious to anyone who follows the Packers.
That being said, I hope he has sources on this one.
Re: NFL Network Reports Randy Moss will be a Patriot
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,654
- And1: 43
- Joined: Jun 28, 2006
Re: NFL Network Reports Randy Moss will be a Patriot
Fort Minor wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Well if this is true, SR, you seriously have some "restructuring" of your own to do, regarding the content of your post.
THis is what he said...
NEW YORK (April 28, 2007) -- Oakland is sitting on two of the potentially biggest draft-day developments.
For starters, the Raiders have been calling New England, trying to engineer a trade for Randy Moss. The Patriots are interested and have offered a second-day pick for Moss. Raiders owner Al Davis shot down the Patriots' offer, believing he can get more. The two sides continue talking, hoping to hammer out a trade that seems less likely today than it did yesterday.
But New England has an advantage other teams don't. Any team that wants to trade for Moss will have to rework his contract, which calls for him to make $9.75 million this season. The Raiders even have asked Moss to restructure his contract -- the wide receiver has refused, challenging Oakland. But Moss is willing to redo his contract for the Patriots, a team the wide receiver believes can win the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl, at this point, is Moss' motivation in going to play for the Patriots.
As it stands now, it looks like it could be difficult to trade Moss this weekend. But the talks are ongoing and active, and they bear monitoring.
The other big development regarding the Raiders is the talks they've had in regards to their No. 1 overall pick. The team making a push to move up to No. 1 is the Cleveland Browns. But in exchange for the pick that put the Browns in position to draft LSU quarterback JaMarcus Russell, the Raiders are demanding a first-, second- and third-round pick, and another first-round pick next year. At those terms, the Browns will pass on the deal, but they will continue to monitor the situation in the hopes they can pull off the trade.
http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/10155219[/url]
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
The only way I want GB to look at Moss if he is released...which could be a very strong possibility. If Oakland is looking to trade him that bad then I am guessing Calvin Johnson just might be a very real pick at #1 and you don't want an idiot cancer like Moss around a good, hard working kid like Johnson.
- DelaneyRudd
- Senior Mod
- Posts: 104,514
- And1: 9,460
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
-
- SugarRay34
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,914
- And1: 11
- Joined: Oct 10, 2003
- Location: cappingthegame.com
- DigitalFool
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,573
- And1: 152
- Joined: Jul 13, 2006
- bigkurty
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,212
- And1: 1,511
- Joined: Apr 23, 2005
- Location: Gilbert, AZ
-
DigitalFool wrote:I think Moss to Packers won't happen... Arrigo spoke out the first time this morning - he said 60% chance Packers get Moss. He said NE offered a 2nd rnd pick - problem is, they dont' HAVE a 2nd rnd pick. Someone caught him on it and he said, oh, 2nd rnd pick in 08 - so I'm beginning to wonder.
This guy sounds like he is full of **** then.
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,649
- And1: 41,243
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
DigitalFool wrote:I think Moss to Packers won't happen... Arrigo spoke out the first time this morning - he said 60% chance Packers get Moss. He said NE offered a 2nd rnd pick - problem is, they dont' HAVE a 2nd rnd pick. Someone caught him on it and he said, oh, 2nd rnd pick in 08 - so I'm beginning to wonder.
I've never once thought he'd be a Packer. Just didn't make any sense to me.
I've been wrong plenty of times before though...