semi-sentient wrote:In the NBA Finals, he most certainly has faced much better defenses. The best that Jordan faced was the Sonics in 96', and I think we can safely say that the Sonics were not in the same stratosphere as either the Pistons or Celtics.
I'd take issue with that. Here's what the '96 Sonics and the '08 Celtics held teams to in the playoffs:
2008 Celtics: 88.8 ppg/42.7% FG
1996 Sonics: 92.7 ppg/43.4% FG
Now, even taken alone, this shows that they are not "stratospheres" apart. However, Seattle faced more potent offensive teams during their playoff run than Boston did. Here are the team averages of their respective opponents during the regular seasons in question:
2008 Celtics' Opponents: 100.1 ppg/45.7% FG
1996 Sonics' Opponents: 102.4 ppg/47.2% FG
Now, with this in mind, when we look at how far below their averages Seattle/Boston held teams to during their respective playoff runs, this is what we get:
2008 Celtics: -11.2 ppg/-3.0% FG
1996 Sonics: -9.7 ppg/-3.8% FG
The Celtics were a little better at keeping scores down, and Seattle was a little better at making teams shoot poorly. In addition, both teams did a sterling defensive job on the best offensive teams in the league (Lakers/Bulls) and the best offensive players in the league (Kobe/Jordan).
There are no "stratospheres" here, semi-sentient.