BooRadley wrote:Hopefully straight to hell or Philippines Basketball League. People are starving and this guy won't take a very fair offer. It's not even like he's getting low balled. I could understand that. He's straight dissing a very legit decent offer.
To be honest, it IS as though he's getting lowballed. Basically, ALL NBA players are overpaid and guys not on their rookie contracts are pretty much universally considered to be so. Just because Deng and Josh Smith were both screwed over in free agency doesn't suddenly mean that the market is so much lower than it really is. Relatively speaking, though, let's take a look at other non-elite 2-guards who are known for average or worse defense make when they aren't on rookie contracts and see where Gordon's salary demands would put him and where the Bulls offer would put him.
Jason Richardson - $13 a season avg.
Larry Hughes - $13 mil a season avg.
Rip Hamilton - $11 mil a season avg.
Monta Ellis - $11 mil a season avg.
Mike Dunleavy - $10 mil a season avg.
Michael Redd - $16.5 mil a season avg.
Jamal Crawford - $10 mil a season avg.
Kevin Martin - $11 mil a season avg.
Gordon isn't the best or worst player on that list but really, other than a couple players being slightly underpaid relative the list it seems like it wouldn't be hard at all to make the argument that Gordon is worth a deal around at least $11 mil a season. It's easy to say that most of that list is overpaid but when you start dropping down a tier or two and seeing what guys like Jason Terry and Bobby Jackson are paid then that salary for Gordon seems even more justifiable. It's pretty clear, though, that Gordon is worth more than the $59 mil over 6 years the Bulls are reputedly offering him. I'd definitely rather have Gordon on my team than Jamal Crawford.