Next city that should get an NBA team?

MaryvalesFinest · Post #1 » by **MaryvalesFinest** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 1:34 am

Just wondering what city everyone thinks should get a NBA team if a team ever decides to move or the NBA has an expansion and why they should get it.

nesta · Post #2 » by **nesta** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 1:37 am

Las Vegas is off that list for sure

milehigh · Post #3 » by **milehigh** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 1:37 am

The Clippers should go back to San Diego.

carrottop12 · Post #4 » by **carrottop12** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 1:41 am

KC, Brooklyn obviously, and NJ after they leave.

Dtown84 · Post #5 » by **Dtown84** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 1:41 am

Seattle

HumbleBumbleBee · Post #6 » by **HumbleBumbleBee** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 1:45 am

Vancouver/Seattle area

rewill17 · Post #7 » by **rewill17** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 1:45 am

C.-@-L.

mrfatwrecker · Post #8 » by **mrfatwrecker** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 1:52 am

We don't need anymore teams. We need LESS teams. The league has enough watered down expansion crap franchises with little to no talent. The NBA should be as competitive as possible and there should be more talent spread amongst all the teams.

Post #9 » by **DelaneyRudd** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 1:58 am

I voted for Flagstaff since having a team in Maryvale is (Please Use More Appropriate Word).

RJM · Post #10 » by **RJM** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 2:14 am

Seattle no doubt.

ForeveRaptorFan · Post #11 » by **ForeveRaptorFan** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 2:22 am

mrfatwrecker wrote:We don't need anymore teams. We need LESS teams. The league has enough watered down expansion crap franchises with little to no talent. The NBA should be as competitive as possible and there should be more talent spread amongst all the teams.

^^ Agreed.

TrueRain · Post #12 » by **TrueRain** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 2:28 am

Seattle.

Lord Eder · Post #13 » by **Lord Eder** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 2:30 am

Definately Seattle. Just doesn't seem right without the Sonics.

Huskies1947 · Post #14 » by **Huskies1947** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 2:31 am

Vancouver, this time a fair shot would help.

Cavsfan4lyfe · Post #15 » by **Cavsfan4lyfe** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 2:33 am

mrfatwrecker wrote:We don't need anymore teams. We need LESS teams. The league has enough watered down expansion crap franchises with little to no talent. The NBA should be as competitive as possible and there should be more talent spread amongst all the teams.

Yeah, I would love for the league to cut it down to 28 teams, as long as the Cavs aren't one of the teams cut

Duiz · Post #16 » by **Duiz** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 3:35 am

Honestly... this is just another Retardesque thread of Barkleyian proportions.

Dude, the next teams are gonna be overseas. Remember the 4 expansion teams that should be starting in Europe. A more interested thread would be saying, which city should get an NBA from this expansion? Madrid, London, Munich, Paris, Rome, Athens, Moscow, Barcelona, Istanbul, Berlin, Lyon, or Milan?

Don't ask for F@#$ing Maryvale, Flagstaff, Birmingham, Jacksonville or the recently denied Seattle.

Post #17 » by **The Rebel** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 5:44 am

MaryvalesFinest wrote:Just wondering what city everyone thinks should get a NBA team if a team ever decides to move or the NBA has an expansion and why they should get it.

I think New York is about due to get a team, after all they are one of the largest markets in the world. Other then that they should give one back to Seattle in a couple of years.

AgEnT50 · Post #18 » by **AgEnT50** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 5:54 am

dEf the The Emerald City

Post #19 » by **LLcoleJ** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 6:05 am

maryville

Post #20 » by **gojoorange** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 6:13 am

Vancouver

What should be the next city to get an NBA team?