What happened in 2004

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

What happened in 2004 

Post#1 » by TheOUTLAW » Sun Aug 24, 2008 1:38 am

I'm going out on a limb here and assuming that the US is going to win the Gold medal. But looking back at the team in 2004. Sure the team was hastily put together, but they still should have had enough to at the very least avoid losing 3 times.

Allen Iverson
Stephon Marbury
Tim Duncan
Lamar Odom
Richard Jefferson
Dwyane Wade
Carlos Boozer
Carmelo Anthony
LeBron James
Shawn Marion
Amare Stoudemire
Emeka Okafor

Sure maybe the team could have used a little more outside shooting but it might be that the greatest improvement is not having Brown as the coach. He was stubborn in his refusal to play Carmelo and LeBron significant minutes. It just seems to me that this team underperformed more than it reflecting on the rest of the world catching up with US basketball.

2004 USA Men's Olympic Games Cumulative Statistics


G/S FGM-A Pct 3PM-A Pct FTM-A Pct Reb/Avg Pts/Avg At Bk St
Iverson 8/8 34-90 .378 15-41 .366 27-38 .711 13/ 1.6 110/ 13.8 20 1 11
Duncan 8/8 38-67 .567 0- 2 .000 27- 36 .750 73/ 9.1 103/ 12.9 13 10 6
Marbury 8/8 30-71 .423 10-31 .323 14-19 .737 10/ 1.3 84/ 10.5 27 0 7
Marion 8/0 34-64 .531 4-10 .400 7- 9 .778 47/ 5.9 79/ 9.9 6
3 9
Odom 8/8 29-51 .569 4- 8 .500 12-23 .522 46/ 5.8 74/ 9.3 11 5 16
Boozer 8/0 20-32 .625 0- 0 .--- 21-32 .656 49/ 6.1 61/ 7.6 3 1 6
Wade 8/0 21-55 .382 0- 3 .000 16-23 .696 15/ 1.9 58/ 7.3 19 3 17
Jefferson 8/8 18-56 .321 6-23 .261 12-22 .545 22/ 2.8 54/ 6.8 8 3 2
James 8/0 19-32 .594 3-10 .300 2- 2 1.000 8/ 1.0 43/ 5.4 13 0 6
Stoudemire 8/0 9-16 .563 0- 1 .000 4- 8 .500 14/ 1.8 22/ 2.8 1 4 3
Anthony 7/0 7-28 .250 2-11 .182 1- 2 .500 11/ 1.6 17/ 2.4 0 0 2
Okafor 2/0 0- 2 .000 0- 0 .--- 0- 0 .--- 3/ 1.5 0/ 0.0 0 0 0
USA 8 259-564 .459 44-140 .314 143-214 .668 311/38.9 705/ 88.1 121 30 85
OPP. 8 233-483 .482 86-195 .441 116-171 .678 225/28.1 668/ 83.5 88 19 45
Wow, the US team actually shot under 500 as a team. Has this team had even a game where they shot under 500?
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
Dtown84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,590
And1: 219
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
       

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#2 » by Dtown84 » Sun Aug 24, 2008 1:52 am

The zone ate this team alive very few good shooters from long range, and Duncan didn't play well under FIBA rules. Larry Brown's stubborn refusal to play the younger guys didn't help either. With all that said they still managed bronze losing to NBA laden gold medalist Argentina.
Patterns
Banned User
Posts: 6,008
And1: 18
Joined: Sep 19, 2007

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#3 » by Patterns » Sun Aug 24, 2008 1:57 am

No good shooters plus you have AI and Steph as the Pgs.

Hell, I am going to say that this team is absolutely horrible at shooting. The only decent shooter on that team is Melo and Marion and they are both decent at best shooting open jumpers.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#4 » by dockingsched » Sun Aug 24, 2008 1:59 am

iverson 34 for 90, 37.8%
marbury 30 for 71, 42.3%
wade 21 for 55, 38.3%
anthony 7 for 28, 25.0%

ouch.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
carrottop12
RealGM
Posts: 21,602
And1: 30
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: why you take out my sig for?

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#5 » by carrottop12 » Sun Aug 24, 2008 1:59 am

The starting PG line up is crap when you are depending on distribution to get the other players involved.

And if you put me on the roster I would have instantly been the best shooter on the team.

Whoever put that team together was an idiot.
User avatar
INKtastic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 23,259
And1: 5,027
Joined: May 26, 2003
Location: Ohio
Contact:
     

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#6 » by INKtastic » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:01 am

mebury happened
http://www.inktastic.com/ Custom T-Shirts and more
User avatar
RoyceDa59
RealGM
Posts: 24,262
And1: 9,174
Joined: Aug 25, 2002
         

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#7 » by RoyceDa59 » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:01 am

Tim Duncan is the only legitimate defender on that team, and his stlye of play isn't suited to FIBA style of play.

That team is so poorly structured. Reading down the list I kept seeing players names that I would highly avoid. The first two names on the list are Iverson and Marbury... the complete opposite type of players that succeed in FIBA - team oriented - baksetball.
Go Raps!!
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#8 » by kooldude » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:07 am

My question is why Tim Duncan is bad at FIFA bball. I would think that's more suited for him since FIBA is more team play and a higher emphasis on fundamentals and less on athleticism.
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,091
And1: 1,970
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#9 » by Ballings7 » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:07 am

The bombings in Greece scared numerous players off, so that made things pretty iffy

But man, that's a bad shooting team...
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
User avatar
AgEnT50
General Manager
Posts: 8,256
And1: 188
Joined: Feb 11, 2008
Location: The Rafters at Amway Center
   

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#10 » by AgEnT50 » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:07 am

Well just from glancing. . .


No one on that team was a "pure" shooter at that time. . .

Also none were roll players. . .

Nor had any any of them established themselves as a defensive presence, well with the exception of TD. To be quite honest, I don't think some players came in expecting to ride the bench or play a "small" roll on the team
supergallinari
Banned User
Posts: 2,216
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 05, 2008

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#11 » by supergallinari » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:10 am

lj4mvp wrote:mebury happened


Tisk Tisk... No insults...BR
User avatar
JellosJigglin
RealGM
Posts: 15,522
And1: 9,555
Joined: Jul 14, 2004

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#12 » by JellosJigglin » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:10 am

no mamba.
GuyverX
Head Coach
Posts: 6,308
And1: 4,337
Joined: Sep 11, 2004
Location: Clipper Nation
 

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#13 » by GuyverX » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:14 am

kooldude wrote:My question is why Tim Duncan is bad at FIFA bball. I would think that's more suited for him since FIBA is more team play and a higher emphasis on fundamentals and less on athleticism.


The zone. There is no 3 second rule or illegal defense in FIBA and guys can stay in the paint all day long if they want. Duncan is the best PF ever but nobody can get good shots off when there are 3 guys in the paint. He was forced to kick out and that team had no real spot up shooting threat outside of Anthony.

International play is heavily dependent on guards over forwards and centers. This year's team is so good at stealing the ball and running the break, it doesn't matter as much but you can see when they go into half court offense and are forced to hit long jumpers, they are not nearly as effective.
nesta
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,986
And1: 242
Joined: Jun 20, 2005

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#14 » by nesta » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:20 am

AI and Marbury were ineffective because they weren't paired up with shooters. US had horrible perimeter D, which lead to teams driving in the paint and racking up fouls on Duncan. Wade, Boozer, James, Stoudemire, Marion, Anthony weren't what they are right now. Odom and Jefferson can't shoot. Okafor didn't even get a chance to prove himself, he could of helped Duncan defend the paint. The final and main reason why USA did bad was because Larry Brown is a overrated coach and can not work with young players(see Knicks). Gregg Popovich should of been the head coach.
abcdef
Banned User
Posts: 810
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 18, 2008

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#15 » by abcdef » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:28 am

kooldude wrote:My question is why Tim Duncan is bad at FIFA bball. I would think that's more suited for him since FIBA is more team play and a higher emphasis on fundamentals and less on athleticism.


The refs didn't like him and kept putting him in foul trouble. They were specifically why he quit FIBA basketball. Still he was the second leading scorer on the team (12.9 to AI's 13.8) and the leading rebounder.
timlin500
Starter
Posts: 2,051
And1: 124
Joined: Sep 18, 2005
 

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#16 » by timlin500 » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:32 am

There were just too many players that didn't fit FIBA basketball. Although I think with a different coach, they should have still been able to win. They still have the talent, just have to play the right way.
Don Draper
General Manager
Posts: 8,677
And1: 506
Joined: Mar 09, 2008
Location: schönes Wetter

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#17 » by Don Draper » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:59 am

AI = The Cancer
soda wrote:I will never, ever, ever vote for a socialist. I'd vote for a member of the KKK first. I'd vote for Hitler first, because the Nazis have less blood on their hands

This is the state of modern day political discourse.
kdot99
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 212
Joined: Jul 03, 2006

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#18 » by kdot99 » Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:10 am

Remember the 2003 team? That team would of taken gold for sure.

They had elite NBA players (at every position) that played well together, like the 08 team.

Tracy McGrady, Vince Carter, Ray Allen, Allen Iverson were among the best SG's in the league at the time, and all brought great all around skills needed in international game. A prime J-Kidd was running the point with All-Star bigs Duncan, J.O'neal, Brand and Martin who were brought in as big, athletic, intimidating bigs (and of course skillful).

That team would of DEFINITELY win the 04 Olympics.

The 04 team consisted of few elite star players with very young and inexperienced players (LeBron, Carmelo, Amare, Wade, Okafor) and players that just didn't compliment each other well. And Larry Brown wasn't the greatest person to the coach the team either...
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#19 » by dockingsched » Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:44 am

here's a list of players that would have made that roster a lot better, including some top notch guards.

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/g ... 230837.asp
The terrorists have won at least one battle with the United States this summer. They have scared away many of our most talented basketball players from playing on the 2004 U.S. Olympic team in Athens. The list of perennial NBA All Stars that either declined invitations or withdrew after previously agreeing to play is quite impressive: Tracy McGrady, Shaquille O'Neal, Kobe Bryant, Karl Malone, Kevin Garnett, Ray Allen, Jason Kidd, Mike Bibby, Jermaine O'Neal, Vince Carter, Elton Brand, Kenyon Martin, and Ben Wallace — to name just a few.

Many of these players have not been shy about why they refused to play for Team U.S.A. Wallace and fellow NBA championship teammate Richard Hamilton quit the Olympic team for "security reasons," according to the Detroit Free Press. Even though their own head coach, Larry Brown, is the head coach of the Olympic squad, both players were apparently not as brave. Same goes for Kidd, O'Neal, McGrady, and Wallace — all of whom cited "security concerns" as their primary reason not to play.

Several of these players will be in the basketball Hall of Fame one day. But there ought to be an asterisk next to each of their names, to let generations to come know that they decided not to represent our country in the Olympics while America was at war.

To be fair, not all of these guys were cowards. Kobe Bryant has a few legal issues to deal with this summer, and Ray Allen's wife is expecting a baby. They get a pass. But the rest of the players who abandoned Team U.S.A should be ashamed of themselves (not that Kobe shouldn't be, for other reasons).


put in tmac, kobe, ray allen, vince carter, kidd take out marbury, jefferson, iverson, a young wade...gold.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
Storm Surge
General Manager
Posts: 9,024
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 27, 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: What happened in 2004 

Post#20 » by Storm Surge » Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:00 am

yeah that team would win gold and no one would ever talk about the 3-year plan or commitment.

T-Mac, Vince, Ray Allen, Kidd were in their absolute prime they are 10x better than marbury or jefferson.

Kobe is Kobe.

Return to The General Board