Rasho Nesterovic anyone???

bossman23 · Post #1 » by **bossman23** » Sat Aug 30, 2008 7:06 pm

he would be a solid back-up behind Z.....he is another Z....he can contribute when given mins & knows the game pretty well b/c he is vet...he may also come very cheap

i was thinking snow for Rasho Nesterovic?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDYD4BuNiog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXr6-5RDG4Y

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgU1mDy_FAA

Post #2 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Sat Aug 30, 2008 8:34 pm

I think that the Cavs would like to have Rasho but I can't see anyone that they'd be willing to give up to get him.

Orlock78 · Post #3 » by **Orlock78** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:35 pm

From a Pacer perspective, its unlikely you guys get Nesterovic without taking Tinsley.

Just saying.

Post #4 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:01 pm

There is no chance that the Cavs take Tinsley so I guess that means no Rasho.

bhinder11 · Post #5 » by **bhinder11** » Mon Sep 1, 2008 4:16 am

You guys won't give up anything for him and like the poster above me said unless you want to take back Tinsley, Rasho's out of the equation.

Post #6 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Mon Sep 1, 2008 12:14 pm

Like I already said, the Cavs will not take Tinsley. It's not as though the Cavs need Rasho. He'd be a good back up but he'd still be a backup. Why is the world you guys think that a backup C is worth the Cavs taking on Tinsley and his contract I have no idea. But let me assure you that it's a ridiculus premise. What you keep suggesting is just plain dumb.

Canomad · Post #7 » by **Canomad** » Wed Sep 3, 2008 12:47 pm

agree

rasho and tinsley are def not needed at all!

Post #8 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:12 pm

Without even talking Tinsley, why would Indy trade a guy in Rasho who's expiring that they (admittedly, we) could actually use for a guy in Eric Snow who's expiring, that won't play a single second on the court? Cleveland's the only team that could cut Snow's contract off the books, not Indy. It'd take a pick or young prospect to even make an offer. JJ Hickson would be too much value for Cleveland to give up, while a 2nd round pick would likely not be enough. To be honest, it'd probably have to be a heavily protected 1st round pick (like top 23-25 protected) to make a deal. Then, ask yourselves, is Rasho really worth a 1st round pick to you guys when you already have Ben Wallace off the bench? I think the answer likely is no.

Post #9 » by **Rise Against** » Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:59 am

Rasho is not the same as Z.. What in the world are you thinking?