Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, sixers hoops, Foshan
Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 17,697
- And1: 8
- Joined: Aug 26, 2002
- Location: Zoo Jersey
-
Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
According to new reports, both Mario Chalmers and Darrell Arthur were caught with weed at the NBA's Rookie Transitional Program in NY. Both players were sent home and will probably be fined and suspended.
Anyone know what the suspension period for weed has been in the past???
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3567481
Anyone know what the suspension period for weed has been in the past???
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3567481
Re: Arthur and Chalmers Caught With Weed
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,046
- And1: 2,089
- Joined: Sep 21, 2005
- Location: South Jersey
Re: Arthur and Chalmers Caught With Weed
I assume they were actually caught in the act... like mid-joint... if they were both caught. Pretty careless move.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,304
- And1: 102
- Joined: May 11, 2006
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
well it's good to see the program is working well
"Our goals are to build over time a championship caliber team that can compete year in and year out, and that doesn’t happen overnight.”
- Sam Hinkie
- Sam Hinkie
51X3RF4N wrote:Sam Hinkie doesn't participate in the draft. The draft gets Sam Hinkie'd.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 17,697
- And1: 8
- Joined: Aug 26, 2002
- Location: Zoo Jersey
-
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
Seriously, getting caught with paraphernalia is one thing. Getting caught mid-act is straight up stupid, if that's what happened. Put a bathroom towel under the doors, guys.... errr.... or so I hear that's what you're supposed to do.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Senior
- Posts: 700
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 06, 2008
- Location: Houston
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
The Guilty Party wrote:Seriously, getting caught with paraphernalia is one thing. Getting caught mid-act is straight up stupid, if that's what happened. Put a bathroom towel under the doors, guys.... errr.... or so I hear that's what you're supposed to do.

These guys are excellent career starters and masters at first impressions.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 17,697
- And1: 8
- Joined: Aug 26, 2002
- Location: Zoo Jersey
-
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
Chris Broussard just updated his column and put this bombshell in there as well...
A source said No. 2 overall pick Michael Beasley was also in the room. The NBA, however, said Beasley is not believed to have been involved.
I suppose it makes sense for Beasley to be in there since he is now teammates with Chalmers but still.... this isn't exactly what the league wants to see out of these guys before they've played in even their first pre-season game. For conversations sake, Arthur and Chalmers mean very little to the league but Beasley does mean something. Any chance that they didn't send Beasley home in an attempt to keep him out of this news report??
A source said No. 2 overall pick Michael Beasley was also in the room. The NBA, however, said Beasley is not believed to have been involved.
I suppose it makes sense for Beasley to be in there since he is now teammates with Chalmers but still.... this isn't exactly what the league wants to see out of these guys before they've played in even their first pre-season game. For conversations sake, Arthur and Chalmers mean very little to the league but Beasley does mean something. Any chance that they didn't send Beasley home in an attempt to keep him out of this news report??
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,046
- And1: 2,089
- Joined: Sep 21, 2005
- Location: South Jersey
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
The Guilty Party wrote:Seriously, getting caught with paraphernalia is one thing. Getting caught mid-act is straight up stupid, if that's what happened. Put a bathroom towel under the doors, guys.... errr.... or so I hear that's what you're supposed to do.
You just don't put yourself in that position. The opportunity cost of getting high just isn't worth the repercussions if your a professional athlete. Save it for the off-season.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,665
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 17, 2008
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
2 out of 3 have earned themselves a suspension without pay. Maybe 1 game, maybe more. All 3 have earned a lot of random drug tests over the next few seasons. Just stupid.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,046
- And1: 2,089
- Joined: Sep 21, 2005
- Location: South Jersey
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
Is Speights in NY for this NBA Rookie Transitional Program? If so, I have no doubt he was reading his bible while Chalmers and Arthur were in mid-session.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,151
- And1: 3
- Joined: Apr 15, 2007
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
I was upset until I heard there were women involved.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,474
- And1: 536
- Joined: Feb 18, 2002
- Location: Philadelphia
- Contact:
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
There's no suspension for the first two violations. Each additional one increments 5 games (i.e. 3rd time is a 5 game, 4th is a 10 game, etc).
http://www.nbpa.org/cba_articles/articl ... p#section8
http://www.nbpa.org/cba_articles/articl ... p#section8
(c) Penalties.
Any player who (i) tests positive for marijuana pursuant to Section 5 (Reasonable Cause Testing), Section 6 (Random Testing), or Section 14 (Additional Bases for Testing), (ii) is adjudged by the Grievance Arbitrator pursuant to Section 5(e) above to have used or possessed marijuana, or (iii) has been convicted of (including a plea of guilty, no contest or nolo contendere to) the use or possession of marijuana in violation of the law, shall suffer the following penalties:
(A) For the first such violation, the player shall be required to enter the Marijuana Program;
(B) For the second such violation, the player shall be fined $25,000 and, if the player is not then subject to in-patient or aftercare treatment in the Marijuana Program, be required to enter the Marijuana Program;
(C) For the third such violation, the player shall be suspended for five (5) games and, if the player is not then subject to in-patient or aftercare treatment in the Marijuana Program, be required to enter the Marijuana Program; and
(D) For any subsequent violation, the player shall be suspended for five (5) games longer than his immediately preceding suspension for violating the Marijuana Program and, if the player is not then subject to in-patient or aftercare treatment in the Marijuana Program, be required to enter the Marijuana Program.
twitter.com/DerekBodnerNBA :: Senior writer, The Athletic Philadelphia
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 17,697
- And1: 8
- Joined: Aug 26, 2002
- Location: Zoo Jersey
-
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
The column has been updated yet again and this time, Beasley's name has been removed completely from the column. I wonder if someone from the NBA talked to Broussard.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
- CoachK
- Sophomore
- Posts: 137
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
At least now you know why Chalmers was so calm taking the last shot.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,263
- And1: 3,963
- Joined: May 04, 2005
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
The next step is smoking weed one hour before a urine test.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,665
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 17, 2008
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
Dbodner, being that this was all over the press, while the NBA might not suspend them for this, their teams might and they will be well within their rights. Every single NBA contract that I'm aware of has clauses about behavior, illegal acts, arrests, non-basketball activities, etc. If the teams chose to punish these guys for getting kicked out of a mandatory NBA rookie's program, part of which talks about not smoking pot, for smoking pot, I seriously doubt the BPA will be able to get those suspensions overturned.
Either way, it was stupid and embarassing for these guys and will lead to multiple random tests in the future. And the whole thing could have been avoided if they just put a towel under the door.
Either way, it was stupid and embarassing for these guys and will lead to multiple random tests in the future. And the whole thing could have been avoided if they just put a towel under the door.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,665
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 17, 2008
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
From TrueHoop blog on ESPN:
"Although the league says no decision has been made yet as to whether or not they will be suspended, it's extremely likely that Arthur and Chalmers are regretting their decision.
Before even suiting up for a single regular season NBA game, they are getting a mighty public shaming and possibly a suspension."
"Although the league says no decision has been made yet as to whether or not they will be suspended, it's extremely likely that Arthur and Chalmers are regretting their decision.
Before even suiting up for a single regular season NBA game, they are getting a mighty public shaming and possibly a suspension."
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 17,697
- And1: 8
- Joined: Aug 26, 2002
- Location: Zoo Jersey
-
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
Also from the TrueHoop column...
Every basketball person I talk to says the same thing: That was so dumb. People have reacted to the reports by accusing the players violated everything from common sense (partying at the League's big "you're a professional now" confab?) to basic pot smokers' etiquette (you mean they didn't learn about the towel-under-the-door thing in college?)
I'm glad to see that a number of people have pointed out the old towel-under-the-door trick. Also of interest is that out of 122,000 people polled on espn.com, 51% of them responded that they are not bothered at all by the idea of professional athletes smoking pot. Even though I was one of those voters, I am a little shocked to see the percentage that high. Finally, I love the picture used on the TrueHoop page of Darrell Arthur. As the caption reads, this is probably the last time the NBA takes a picture of him in the clouds.

Every basketball person I talk to says the same thing: That was so dumb. People have reacted to the reports by accusing the players violated everything from common sense (partying at the League's big "you're a professional now" confab?) to basic pot smokers' etiquette (you mean they didn't learn about the towel-under-the-door thing in college?)
I'm glad to see that a number of people have pointed out the old towel-under-the-door trick. Also of interest is that out of 122,000 people polled on espn.com, 51% of them responded that they are not bothered at all by the idea of professional athletes smoking pot. Even though I was one of those voters, I am a little shocked to see the percentage that high. Finally, I love the picture used on the TrueHoop page of Darrell Arthur. As the caption reads, this is probably the last time the NBA takes a picture of him in the clouds.

Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Senior
- Posts: 700
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 06, 2008
- Location: Houston
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
I honestly don't know why anyone would be bothered by it.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 17,697
- And1: 8
- Joined: Aug 26, 2002
- Location: Zoo Jersey
-
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
AD28 wrote:I honestly don't know why anyone would be bothered by it.
While I have absolutely no problem with it, I think there is a significant portion of the country who believes all drugs are bad and people who do drugs are criminals. Either way, it'll be interesting to see if Arthur and Chalmers are suspended for this. According to Abbott, they won't be suspended for smoking pot but they could be suspended for missing a mandatory meeting.
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
- barkley34
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,945
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 28, 2003
- Location: Washington Township, NJ
Re: Arthur and Chalmers In Trouble
Maybe that is why some teams were scared off Arthur and he fell in the draft? I imagine that teams probably employ private detectives to follow the players around to see if they are out partying every night etc.,, before they commit to paying them millions of dollars.
Anyway, you have to be pretty stupid to get caught smoking pot at the rookie orientation seminar that teaches young guys to avoid getting caught with pot. That is like bringing a case of beer to an alcoholics anonymous meeting.
Anyway, you have to be pretty stupid to get caught smoking pot at the rookie orientation seminar that teaches young guys to avoid getting caught with pot. That is like bringing a case of beer to an alcoholics anonymous meeting.
