JES12 wrote:You can read whatever you want, but the fact is you are putting words in my mouth and assuming I said or think something that never was said, implied or though by myself. I never said "Kidd is not" so no reason to ask the question. The point is they are both HOFers and he refered to only one HOFer on this team.
And yes, Dirk is a HOFer right now. He could retire today and be in the HOF in 2015. He has an MVP, unklike Kidd. Dirk has been on the last 8 all NBA teams and counting, Kidd has been to 6 total. They both have 7 all-star appearences and newsflash: one of the two will be there again this year. So don't try to downplay Dirk in order to hype Kidd. My thought's were always both are going to be in the HOF, but I would call them future HOFers until they are voted in even if they are retired.
It sounds like you are the one with the hidden or implied agenda....not me.
SpeedyG wrote:But when people talk about a player who's career is almost over (and thus, we have a clear picture of what their career already looks like compared to others), there's no need to add the word "future"
I'm not saying you, but anyone inturpreting Antoine's statement can read this same sentance as being old enough to pracctically be in it already.
Plain and simple, when he made that statement, I was trying to figure out who he was talking about (I'm still not sure he was talking about Kidd, but somehow you are...why?) and automaticly assumed that Dirk is the one he was refering to and was trying to figure out why he did not concider Kidd one also. You seem to think the 2 players are the other way around. Who knows? If we are to assume the OLDER one based upon "career almost being over" then the one he was calling the HOFer is Kidd. I was basing off talent and merit, you were basing off age. By your intupretation, my statement B is the correct one.
Why are you trying to start an argument from nothing? I mean, I think we both agree...do we not agree that both should be "future" HOFers?
Why am I starting an argument from nothing? I"m not. Ever since the deal was made, you've constantly bashed Kidd. So no, I don't see your comments on this thread as "nothing". It's your usual shot at Kidd.
Why did I think that Antoine refer to Kidd as the Hall of Famer? Because just about everyone of his former teammates and coaches regard him as such. I've heard Lawrence Frank, Jefferson, Carter, including Wright when he was with the Nets, refer to him as a HoFer. I've heard Ainge, and McDyess, and Skiles call him such.
I'm not saying Kidd is a HoF and Dirk is not because Kidd is older. I'm saying that because Kidd's career is a complete picture now (for the most part, a championship would just be icing on the cake). Dirk's not. As it stands, he's barely in the radar of any major statistical category. He also has had stigmas attached to him (fair or not) due to the Finals collapse and the first round exit against GS.
It's like calling Wade a HoF. Can't do it, no matter how dominant he is today. His career isn't over, and if (god forbid) it is somewhat cut short, it'll be tough for him to make it, MVP and championship or not.
Kidd both had a prime (two Finals appearance, MVP runner-up, assists title, first team AND defensive team honors, not to mention being viewed as the guy who resurrected an entire NBA franchise that is generally considered the worst in the league) and longevity.
Dirk, Lebron, and all these younger guys don't have the longevity (yet). No one refers to these guys as HoFers...yet. I think we'll start hearing that about Dirk soon, though.
EDIT: anyway, I'll let this one go. I'm the visitor here, so I'll try not to stir too much trouble. Here's to beating Houston.
Bless the man if his heart and his land are one ~ FrancisM, R.I.P. 3/6/09