ImageImage

Brett Favre

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
dedned
Analyst
Posts: 3,728
And1: 1,470
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: nowhere
       

Brett Favre 

Post#1 » by dedned » Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:02 am

Just got done watching the Jets game. Seems like all he knows how to do is win(besides INTs, oh yeah and TDs). Looks like we made a mistake. How many of you cats that tongue kiss Teddy boy diggin this year? 1 losing season in 17 years, of which came under the supervision of ol Teddy boy. Oh yeah tell me how we over achieved last year, cause that really helps your boy's cause. Considering if you take away last years record those two dipsh*ts(TT & MM) got nothing.
Image
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,909
And1: 16,588
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Brett Favre 

Post#2 » by humanrefutation » Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:33 am

Why am I not surprised. A Favre fan coming to the Packers board to diss the Packers. And when the Packers were healthy and 4-3, Whereas the Jets were struggling and had just lost to the freaking Raiders, with everyone calling for Favre's head, nothing to be heard from them.
User avatar
dedned
Analyst
Posts: 3,728
And1: 1,470
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: nowhere
       

Re: Brett Favre 

Post#3 » by dedned » Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:39 am

Really? That's your comeback? Cause I've been around. And I'm a Packer fan. If I wasn't a Packer fan I wouldn't give two sh*ts about letting Favre go. So tell me how great of a decision it was again.
Image
Captain Erv
General Manager
Posts: 8,119
And1: 78
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: Brett Favre 

Post#4 » by Captain Erv » Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:07 am

What is the point? If the Packers were 7-3 you wouldn't be making this post.

I imagine our record would be better if we played the Chiefs, Bengals, and Rams at home too.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,776
And1: 27,347
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Brett Favre 

Post#5 » by trwi7 » Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:23 am

Must be pretty easy to win when your opponents to date have a winning percentage of about .40. Those games against the Bengals, Raiders, Rams and Chiefs sure were tough. And their upcoming games against San Francisco and Seattle are brutal.

I'm glad we got rid of him. The team needed to move on.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 35,767
And1: 11,654
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: Brett Favre 

Post#6 » by MikeIsGood » Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:40 am

I don't visit this board much anymore, but I sure thought it'd be over this. But I guess there has to be a few.

No one needs to make a "comeback" to your argument because it doesn't deserve one.

Once again, as is my response to pretty much any Brett Favre post/article/blog these days - 'yawn.'
User avatar
dedned
Analyst
Posts: 3,728
And1: 1,470
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: nowhere
       

Re: Brett Favre 

Post#7 » by dedned » Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:25 pm

Captain Erv wrote:What is the point? If the Packers were 7-3 you wouldn't be making this post.

I imagine our record would be better if we played the Chiefs, Bengals, and Rams at home too.


The Packers are not 7-3 that's my point. Not sure who are these unstoppable teams that we beat. I mean there really isn't that many great teams. Do you want the Jets to go back and play the 90's Cowboys or something like that.

th87 wrote:Favre certainly had an amazing game, and he definitely still has the skills to succeed. And it's certainly possible that the Packers would've had a better record with him. However, the move was made for the future and is a more prudent one for that very reason. And he shouldn't have retired in the first place. Rodgers is the future and needs to be allowed time to grow. But this game does make me wonder how Favre would've done on the Packers this season.


The thing is trading Favre isn't even the worse move that Ted has made. We keep talking bout the future, but it sounds more like magic beans to me.
Image
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,127
And1: 55,666
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Brett Favre 

Post#8 » by MickeyDavis » Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:19 pm

The whole Favre thing has been rehashed here 1000 times. It's time to move on. I was in favor of bringing him back. But we're 9 games into the season. He's a Jet and can be discussed on the Jets board if need be.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.

Return to Green Bay Packers