Who are we worried about in the West?

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

JStockLivesOn
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,410
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 07, 2007

Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#1 » by JStockLivesOn » Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:55 pm

So, it's a given that the Lakers will be in the thick of things at the top of the conference, and will likely finish 1st or 2nd.

Beyond that, though, things are pretty fluid. Who of the other teams are we worried about leapfrogging us?

I'm not particularly concerned about Phoenix. Shaq's career is in its twilight and Nash is slowing down. Amare is still an absolute animal and one of the most dominant big men in the game, but he can't do it by himself. Their record is very good right now, and they're not to be taken lightly, but I don't see them as an elite team out west.

It's too early to tell what level New Orleans is at right now. They've been a lot healthier than us so far, but lost to Charlotte, as we did. Three of their four wins, though, came against Phoenix, Cleveland and Portland, which isn't unimpressive. Paul has had a very good start to the season and, provided he isn't injured, will remain a constant. He may get dominated by Deron when we play them, but he doesn't get dominated by the majority of the league.

Houston has looked very good so far, and they have a good team on paper. But McGrady is already injured again, something which will continue to haunt them all season, and it's only a matter of time until Yao goes down for a stretch too. They're a strong team when healthy, but will they actually be healthy for more than a handful of games at a time?

Denver got a huge upgrade to their team chemistry in Billups, and it shows. They're 5-1 since his arrival and, in the few snippets I've seen, look to have a different attitude about defense already. I wasn't concerned by them in the slightest before this trade, but I think they could be formidable opponents for the division title now.

I still think Portland is too young to challenge the elite powers this year, and I'm worried for them that Oden might be Ralph Sampson II.

Golden State, Dallas, and Memphis are going nowhere, in my opinion, and will miss the playoffs by a decent margin.

And then there's San Antonio. Every year, I say they're done, and then they prove me wrong, so I'll be reticent on that front this year. They're only 5-5 right now, but Ginobli is yet to play this season, and Parker has missed half their games. Duncan is still going strong and Roger Mason has come out of nowhere to play quite well. They've won three straight, one coming against Houston.

I guess we'll have to see where things are with SA when they're healthy.

So, those are some of my observations. Who are you guys worried about?
Image
"Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested, we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back nor did we falter."
carrottop12
RealGM
Posts: 21,602
And1: 30
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: why you take out my sig for?

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#2 » by carrottop12 » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:29 pm

Lakers will be the top team unless they get injured. Then I fully expect the Jazz to be the #2 team. I think Terry Porter will struggle with that lockerroom full of volatile attitudes, especially if they start losing.

San Anotonio will make a strong push after Ginobili gets back and should likely be a top 4 team again. Good to see Denver playing well also, I would rather them be competing for a 5-6 spot then just hoping to hold onto the 8th seed. Don't ask me why.
User avatar
FJS
Senior Mod - Jazz
Senior Mod - Jazz
Posts: 18,793
And1: 2,162
Joined: Sep 19, 2002
Location: Barcelona, Spain
   

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#3 » by FJS » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:36 pm

Too early to say.
We have to evaluate our team with all pieces togheter.
Some teams looks good.... but we have to realise if we are better or not.
7-4 with all our injuries says a lot of our depth.
Image
GP
Pro Prospect
Posts: 912
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 14, 2006

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#4 » by GP » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:46 pm

We are worried about any team that can beat us come playoff time. That list would be as follows:

Lakers-
they seem to be much improved from last year with the addition of a healthy bynum, we would definitely want to avoid them as much as possible in the playoffs.

San Ant-
we still haven't beaten them in SA for around the past decade and a half. They're always written off and come playoff time do well.

New Orleans-
CP is nearly living up to his hype and is a legit MVP candidate, they could be dangerous as well.
fivas14
Banned User
Posts: 1,658
And1: 0
Joined: May 20, 2008

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#5 » by fivas14 » Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:44 pm

The Lakers are the only team that worries me.
User avatar
Ming Kong!
RealGM
Posts: 24,480
And1: 31
Joined: Nov 21, 2002
Location: Jazz fan in Miami, FL.

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#6 » by Ming Kong! » Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:50 pm

fivas14 wrote:The Lakers are the only team that worries me.


+1

Maybe the Celtics too.
Sloanfeld
Banned User
Posts: 2,717
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 04, 2006
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#7 » by Sloanfeld » Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:55 pm

Lakers, obviously, and SA when they get healthy. How much would it suck if we got the 2 seed and SA got the 7 seed with a healthy team??????? Obviously, I like our chances better this year than the last two. Who else is fired up about Friday's game @ SA???????????
mrce23
Ballboy
Posts: 10
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 04, 2008

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#8 » by mrce23 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:20 am

1. The Refs
2. The Lakers
User avatar
tylero87
Junior
Posts: 275
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#9 » by tylero87 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:28 am

mrce23 wrote:1. The Refs
2. The Lakers



LOL a combination of both would spell disaster in the playoffs. WE NEED HOME COURT ADVANTAGE!
Image

“Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth.”

-Thoreau
kerplunk
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,451
And1: 9
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#10 » by kerplunk » Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:34 am

David Stern!
Ern III
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,274
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 12, 2007
Contact:

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#11 » by Ern III » Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:37 pm

Los Angeles Lakers.
Duiz
Banned User
Posts: 10,714
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 06, 2007
Location: Chaine Wasatch, Occident des Etats-Unis

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#12 » by Duiz » Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:39 pm

It's an odd numbered year. Nuff said.
User avatar
Soul Patch
RealGM
Posts: 21,263
And1: 948
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Location: I'm at the White Castle
Contact:

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#13 » by Soul Patch » Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:22 pm

Lakers and the Spurs, though I am less afraid of the Spurs this year than years past. Denver did get better but I think they'll match up with us better now, before they killed us on the fast break and they've seemed to slow down a little bit. I honestly think we can beat any team in the league in a seven game series, except for maybe the knicks.
Jugs wrote:Fark orf slet kent dome wuote ujquote exp
erudite23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,857
And1: 660
Joined: Jun 14, 2004

Re: Who are we worried about in the West? 

Post#14 » by erudite23 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:20 pm

The Lakers are the only team in the West that has done enough to earn any "worrying" to this point. Every other team, us included, has shown enough warts to build a strong case as to why they aren't legit. I thought this exact thing would happen, actually, before the season, except I thought the Jazz would be on the Lakers' side of things, looking down, rather than caught in the muddle looking up. NO has no bench and lacks the versatility on offense for me to take them serious, and they have been surprisingly bad on D as well so far. Houston's pieces don't really fit well together, imo, and thier health concerns are serious enough to prohibit ANYONE from making a legit case for them until they [i]show[i] that they can stay healthy. Portland is too young and unorganized. Denver looks much, much better now, but still lacks the pieces to be taken seriously, not to mention their own health concerns. SA is cooked. There, I said it. They might make a run at the playoffs, and even make some regular season noise, but they are no longer viable contenders. Manu or no Manu. Dallas is awful.

Which leaves Phoenix. They are the one team that has a decent shot, imo, at making a run at the 'chip. They have everything that you want in a contender, though there are some serious concerns there, too. But if Shaq (a big if) can keep playing like he has been thus far, and they can avoid any unusual injury to a key player, I see them as having enough there to possibly emerge as a real player down the stretch. They still aren't there right now, though.


So, yes, LA is the only team that I worry about at this point. NO, HOU and Pho might eventually do enough to be there, too. The rest are far too unlikely to be taken serious at this point.

Return to Utah Jazz