changing draft??15 to 10?

Moderator: bwgood77

GameTime_3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,480
And1: 4,051
Joined: Sep 20, 2004
Location: Earth
Contact:

changing draft??15 to 10? 

Post#1 » by GameTime_3 » Wed May 16, 2007 10:20 pm

I for one am all for it!! I think the draft takes to long and most of the time they just waste time..i say move it to 10 mins and second round to 7 mins. i think it will get better ratings. what does everyone think???
HDMAVS760CA
Senior
Posts: 668
And1: 31
Joined: May 13, 2006
Location: ONTARIO, CA
       

 

Post#2 » by HDMAVS760CA » Thu May 17, 2007 12:07 am

They need 2 do something. I've thought of that before. Maybe trimming the minutes of the 1st round to 12 minutes. I know that sometimes the team knows who they gonna draft & still wait the whole 15 minutes to select. Just pick the player & speed up the draft.

And its not because I reside in a fast paced state eihter..CA

This year's draft was considered the longest 1st day draft ever.
User avatar
PhilipNelsonFan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,246
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 11, 2004

 

Post#3 » by PhilipNelsonFan » Thu May 17, 2007 1:00 am

Goodell should institute this rule change and then not tell the Vikings.
Tim Lehrbach wrote:I will break the Rose Garden.
Monkeyfeng06
Banned User
Posts: 19,810
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 20, 2005

 

Post#4 » by Monkeyfeng06 » Thu May 17, 2007 2:43 am

it will just create more hilarious draft picks.
User avatar
UTMCretin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,087
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 05, 2006
Location: Look happy, it's the end of the world

 

Post#5 » by UTMCretin » Thu May 17, 2007 2:59 am

Trim it down to 5 minutes. I want to see those execs sweat as they fumble through their poorly wrought draft-related trade proposals
Icness
NFL Analyst
Posts: 16,964
And1: 129
Joined: Apr 30, 2001
Location: Back in the 616
Contact:
   

 

Post#6 » by Icness » Thu May 17, 2007 3:34 am

I just wish that teams who knew exactly what they were going to do didn't exhaust their entire alloted time. Like this year with the Bucs--once they were on the clock their phone rang once, and it was Atlanta calling to tell them they were no longer interested in trading for the pick. End the suspense and make your freaking picks!

Another thing that came out of potential draft revisions is to have the draft in different locales every year, which would be cool IMO. I went in 2000 and it was dreafully long, boring, and uncomfortable, yet at the same time pretty neat and intriguing. I'm not going back to NYC but I'd be willing to go to Chicago or Detroit or Indy (all ~3 hour drives) to see it.
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#7 » by J.Kim » Thu May 17, 2007 6:06 am

Icness wrote:I just wish that teams who knew exactly what they were going to do didn't exhaust their entire alloted time. Like this year with the Bucs--once they were on the clock their phone rang once, and it was Atlanta calling to tell them they were no longer interested in trading for the pick. End the suspense and make your freaking picks!

Another thing that came out of potential draft revisions is to have the draft in different locales every year, which would be cool IMO. I went in 2000 and it was dreafully long, boring, and uncomfortable, yet at the same time pretty neat and intriguing. I'm not going back to NYC but I'd be willing to go to Chicago or Detroit or Indy (all ~3 hour drives) to see it.


Couldn't this be used as a relatively cheap barometer to see what Football interest is like in certain cities? I.E. London or Toronto?
A-Town Connection
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,343
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 23, 2005

 

Post#8 » by A-Town Connection » Thu May 17, 2007 1:33 pm

not a bad idea
Icness
NFL Analyst
Posts: 16,964
And1: 129
Joined: Apr 30, 2001
Location: Back in the 616
Contact:
   

 

Post#9 » by Icness » Thu May 17, 2007 6:03 pm

J.Kim wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Couldn't this be used as a relatively cheap barometer to see what Football interest is like in certain cities? I.E. London or Toronto?


Hmm, I hadn't thought of that angle. I don't think it would work too well unless there is an established rooting interest. Toronto might work because of all the Bills fans, maybe. Plus I think the travel expense would rule out overseas locales. Teams have several hundreds of thousands of dollars of tcom equipment and personnel on site at the draft--just this past draft the Falcons had 47 officially credentialed people at the draft itself, plus another 20 or so back in ATL.

I like the suggestion from Jim Miller on Sirius NFL radio--hold it in LA as a bigger giant middle finger to the fans there.
Ex-hippie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,213
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 17, 2003

 

Post#10 » by Ex-hippie » Thu May 17, 2007 9:32 pm

TiVo is a wonderful thing, people. Do something else early in the afternoon, don't look online to see what any of the picks were, then tune in and zip through. Watch it as you fast-forward, and slow it down for anything that looks interesting. It works.
User avatar
Pierce 4 3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,710
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Location: Wherever there is money to steal

 

Post#11 » by Pierce 4 3 » Thu May 17, 2007 9:56 pm

good idea
User avatar
Shzm13
Banned User
Posts: 4,554
And1: 6
Joined: Dec 11, 2006

 

Post#12 » by Shzm13 » Fri May 18, 2007 9:38 am

Its a great idea.. Teams have months upon months to plan out different scenarios. Ten is more than enough.. 8 should be better.
NeverGoingToWin
Veteran
Posts: 2,901
And1: 14
Joined: Aug 02, 2005

 

Post#13 » by NeverGoingToWin » Fri May 18, 2007 10:52 pm

J.Kim wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Couldn't this be used as a relatively cheap barometer to see what Football interest is like in certain cities? I.E. London or Toronto?


The NFL have known for a while that Toronto could support a team but do not want to move to Canada yet. I only want a team in Toronto if Buffalo moves because there are too many teams in the NFL already.
User avatar
Elway=GOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,475
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 01, 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ

 

Post#14 » by Elway=GOAT » Mon May 21, 2007 2:51 pm

Im all for, moving up from 15 to 10. That would spead things up a bit.

Id rather keep it in NYC. Its fine the way it is. Why the hell move it to Canada? Nobody cares about Canada here(No offense canadians,its blunt but honest imo), and the NFL obvioualy isnt moving any teams anytime soon there. They dont need to anyways.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,347
And1: 5,957
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

 

Post#15 » by gswhoops » Mon May 21, 2007 2:54 pm

I agree, 15 minutes is too long. Though if teams who knew who they were picking didn't take the whole time like Iceness said then we wouldn't have this problem.

Return to The General NFL Board