BCS title game chaos

[LAKESHOW]

i dont know what you are trying to say here. article clearly states three way tie, we are talking about hypothetical 2 way tie where head to head overcomes any BCS bullsh*t. once again, LAKESHOW is wrong.

alright, if you once again read the SHOWs point, there is a 3 way tie in the big12 south division, so as that you can understand the point clearly, whoever has the higher ranking goes to the big12 title game. that is exactly what the article says.

[LAKESHOW]

the BCS is tied into the big12 books. in other words, the big12 south division will send the team to the big12 championship game, THAT HAS THE HIGHER STANDING IN THE BCS! 2 way tie, 3 way tie, 4 way tie doesnt matter. whoever has the higher standing in the BCS, goes to the big12 championship game.

alright, look at it this way. here is the quote above, and hopefully this will illustrate it better. however, if you need to know more, the SHOW could draw it up for you with some diagrams and crayon. but the higher BCS ranking, goes to the title game.

[El Turco]

The other question is, if Okla wins big vs Okla State, do they pass Texas in the BCS? They are only a few points behind. 2 convincing victories over 2 ranked rivals that gave Texas trouble might do it.

I hope not, I think Texas is the best out of the 3.

i think that is the biggest question left. Oklahoma has the momentum, strength of schedule and the impressive wins. Texas has the head to head vs. Oklahoma and their only loss was a very close one in an away game, at the end of a very brutal stretch. it s going to be close but another blow out from Oklahoma, i think they ll get in.

[El Turco]

it would be no brainer to put Tech over USC.

exactly my point. now your buying into it and i'll show your flaw.

5. USC

7. texas tech

what you are saying is that a #7 team should jump ALL THE WAY TO #2. up and over everyone else to the title game.

hopefully holding up the mirror to that argument would be able to assist you in the error of your thinking.

in the same post i told mezzy why they would jump to #2, go back and read again.

[LAKESHOW]

the funny thing is, you truly believe that. from #7 to #2?!?

ooookaay.

[El Turco]

the BCS is tied into the big12 books. in other words, the big12 south division will send the team to the big12 championship game, THAT HAS THE HIGHER STANDING IN THE BCS! 2 way tie, 3 way tie, 4 way tie doesnt matter. whoever has the higher standing in the BCS, goes to the big12 championship game.

alright, look at it this way. here is the quote above, and hopefully this will illustrate it better. however, if you need to know more, the SHOW could draw it up for you with some diagrams and crayon. but the higher BCS ranking, goes to the title game.

OK, READ YOUR QUOTE AGAIN. you are claiming bcs rankings will decide who comes on top whether it s a "2 way tie, 3 way tie, 4 way tie doesnt matter". and i am telling you BCS would not decide the who comes on top in case of a TWO WAY TIE. and i am right and you are wrong. give it up, you are not gonna win this.

[El Turco]

the funny thing is, you truly believe that. from #7 to #2?!?

ooookaay.

and you still can not refute any of my claims. doozy.

[LAKESHOW]

did you forget this part in the sentence?

"in other words, the big12 south division will send the team to the big12 championship game, THAT HAS THE HIGHER STANDING IN THE BCS!"

[LAKESHOW]

the funny thing is, you truly believe that. from #7 to #2?!?

ooookaay.

and you still can not refute any of my claims. doozy.

and once again, the funny part is you call your rants a "claim," jumping from #7 to #2 is not a claim, it is lunacy. ridiculous. unheard of. and on another planet.

[El Turco]

did you forget this part in the sentence?

"in other words, the big12 south division will send the team to the big12 championship game, THAT HAS THE HIGHER STANDING IN THE BCS!"

and they are talking about a three way tie. you are digging deep hole lake, leave the scene to the big boys and save a face.

[El Turco]

the funny thing is, you truly believe that. from #7 to #2?!?

ooookaay.

and you still can not refute any of my claims. doozy.

and once again, the funny part is you call your rants a "claim," jumping from #7 to #2 is not a claim, it is lunacy. ridiculous. unheard of. and on another planet.

go read my post to mezzy and then refute my reasonings. until you do that, you are not worthy enough to discuss this matter with me.

[LAKESHOW]

ahahaha, what other 3 way tie are you talkin about? theres only 3 teams in the big12 south that are in that sort of a tie? and when it comes to those 3 teams, the BCS is deciding their fate to gain a big12 title. ahahaha, cmon man, put the ganja down.

[El Turco]

ahahaha, what other 3 way tie are you talkin about? theres only 3 teams in the big12 south that are in that sort of a tie? and when it comes to those 3 teams, the BCS is deciding their fate to gain a big12 title. ahahaha, cmon man, put the ganja down.

you must have the iq of a 12 year old. discussion came from a HYPOTHETICAL scenario where there would be a TWO-WAY tie. reading is fun, try it.

[LAKESHOW]

ahahaha, what other 3 way tie are you talkin about? theres only 3 teams in the big12 south that are in that sort of a tie? and when it comes to those 3 teams, the BCS is deciding their fate to gain a big12 title. ahahaha, cmon man, put the ganja down.

you must have the iq of a 12 year old. discussion came from a HYPOTHETICAL scenario where there would be a TWO-WAY tie. reading is fun, try it.

hehehe, there you go again, making up stuff as you go. in the BIG12 south, there are 3 teams tied.

let me slow it down for your comprehension, ONLY THE BIG12 SOUTH HAS 3 TIED TEAMS! and the BCS decides which one of those 3 teams will go to the BIG12 title game. that is what the SHOW had said in the post, nevertheless, you keep on talking about something on another planet waaaay out in left field.

[LAKESHOW]

the BCS is tied into the big12 books. in other words, the big12 south division will send the team to the big12 championship game, THAT HAS THE HIGHER STANDING IN THE BCS! 2 way tie, 3 way tie, 4 way tie doesnt matter. whoever has the higher standing in the BCS, goes to the big12 championship game.

ok, the SHOW has compassion for those who do not have the understanding, so here it is once again.

as you can see above, the big12 title game will receive that team from the south division, that has a higher standing in the BCS.

hehehe, really, its that easy.

[J-Mezzy]

Give it up Lake. El Turco wins this one. The argument was that if Oklahoma State beats Oklahoma this week, it will only be a 2 way tie between Tech and Texas. In which case, the head to head would determine the winner of the Big12 south. Which mean, Tech would go.
BCS would only interfere on a 3 way tie situation.

Here's a quote from foxsports.com

If Missouri beats the Big 12 South Champion, this thing goes haywire. OR, if Oklahoma loses to Oklahoma State, then Texas Tech is in the Big 12 title game. Would you take Texas Tech, even if it beats Missouri, in the national championship at this point over Penn State? Not after what happened in Norman you wouldn't. Could you put in Texas? Not if Texas Tech wins the Big 12 title because that would mean Texas didn't even win its own division. If you have a problem with 2001 Nebraska playing for the national title, then you can't put Texas in if Texas Tech wins the Big 12 South.

http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/8840 ... Penn-State

[El Turco]

ahahaha, what other 3 way tie are you talkin about? theres only 3 teams in the big12 south that are in that sort of a tie? and when it comes to those 3 teams, the BCS is deciding their fate to gain a big12 title. ahahaha, cmon man, put the ganja down.

you must have the iq of a 12 year old. discussion came from a HYPOTHETICAL scenario where there would be a TWO-WAY tie. reading is fun, try it.

hehehe, there you go again, making up stuff as you go. in the BIG12 south, there are 3 teams tied.

let me slow it down for your comprehension, ONLY THE BIG12 SOUTH HAS 3 TIED TEAMS! and the BCS decides which one of those 3 teams will go to the BIG12 title game. that is what the SHOW had said in the post, nevertheless, you keep on talking about something on another planet waaaay out in left field.

discussion was regrading HYPOTHETICAL TWO WAY TIE between Texas and Texas Tech, big 12 s current situation has nothing to do with what we were talking about. if you paid attention to reading in grade school, you would ve avoided looking like a clown.

anyway, this should put an end to the discussion for once and for all.

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewArticle. ... M_ID=10410

1. If two teams are tied, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative
2. If three or more teams are tied, steps 1 through 7 will be followed until a determination is made. If only two teams remain tied after any step, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.


1. The records of the three teams will be compared against each other
2. The records of the three teams will be compared within their division
3. The records of the three teams will be compared against the next highest placed teams in their division in order of fi nish (4, 5 and 6)
4. The records of the three teams will be compared against all common conference opponents;
5. The highest ranked team in the fi rst Bowl Championship Series Poll following the completion of Big 12 regular season conference play shall be the representative
6. The team with the best overall winning percentage [excluding exempted games] shall be the representative
7. The representative will be chosen by draw.

only reason BCS is used because teams are tied in h2h games. head to head is the first tiebraker while BCS is the fifth. end game, next question.

[LAKESHOW]

Give it up Lake. El Turco wins this one. The argument was that if Oklahoma State beats Oklahoma this week, it will only be a 2 way tie between Tech and Texas. In which case, the head to head would determine the winner of the Big12 south. Which mean, Tech would go.
BCS would only interfere on a 3 way tie situation.

Here's a quote from foxsports.com

If Missouri beats the Big 12 South Champion, this thing goes haywire. OR, if Oklahoma loses to Oklahoma State, then Texas Tech is in the Big 12 title game. Would you take Texas Tech, even if it beats Missouri, in the national championship at this point over Penn State? Not after what happened in Norman you wouldn't. Could you put in Texas? Not if Texas Tech wins the Big 12 title because that would mean Texas didn't even win its own division. If you have a problem with 2001 Nebraska playing for the national title, then you can't put Texas in if Texas Tech wins the Big 12 South.

http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/8840 ... Penn-State

IF?? alright, here we go again. the SHOW will have to break it down again, for the both of you. there is a 3 WAY TIE. the higher seed in the BCS WILL GO TO THE BIG12 CHAMPIONSHIP. not IF, those are the facts.

secondly, ahahaha, and the SHOW has to stop laughing at this one, turc claims a #7 will jump ALL THE WAY UP to the title game and the #2 position.

but go ahead, keep smokin the ganja and the reality he lives in will become clear.

[El Turco]

in other words, the big12 south division will send the team to the big12 championship game, THAT HAS THE HIGHER STANDING IN THE BCS! 2 way tie, 3 way tie, 4 way tie doesnt matter.

[LAKESHOW]

in other words, the big12 south division will send the team to the big12 championship game, THAT HAS THE HIGHER STANDING IN THE BCS! 2 way tie, 3 way tie, 4 way tie doesnt matter.

correct. 2 way tie does not matter, BECAUSE ITS A 3 WAY TIE!!!

what 2 way tie are you talking about, what other ties are you talking about, IT DOESNT MATTER, WHY? because as the SHOW has been sayin, IT IS A 3 WAY TIE!!