gjn19 wrote:that's 61%. pretty darn good.
the huge difference is between them needing a field goal, and them needing a touchdown...which is about 30 to 35 yards...but i stop now.
we can't get on the same page on this one, i assume; and it's a minor point anyway.
You don't have to stop. It is only minor point, but it's an interesting topic on strategy. At least I think it's interesting
gjn19 wrote:so let's just discuss that people are now shouting for t-jack to start next sunday, given, after a good performance (not stellar, as most saw it...he still had this jump-throws and one bad giver to AD). how crazy is that?
I understand it. Gus kills us with his lack of mobility and makes alot of the same boneheaded decisions that T-Jack makes. The key with Gus is that he'll hit on a few big plays per game, if T-Jack can figure that out, I'd rather go with him.
gjn19 wrote:or who the hell can stop those crazy recievers of the cards? two of the best in the game. griffin and winfield will get picked on.
Our corners won't be able to match up with their receivers. The key is getting to Warner, if he can stand in the pocket he has the accuracy to tear us apart. If we get pressure, he's statuesque and has a tendency to fumble.
gjn19 wrote:or how about chicago loosing to NO? NO is still fighting for the PO's...and are a better team than the bears, imo.
New Orleans is terrible on the road (1-5) and a cold Chicago is a big home field advantage. Of course, Chicago is terrible against the pass and Drew Brees can pick anyone apart.