Kings & Knicks Trade Proposal

btrue · Post #1 » by **btrue** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 4:48 am

Post a reply4 posts • Page 1 of 1
Edit postReport this postReply with quote Knicks & Kings Trade Proposal
by btrue on Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:32 am

Edit postDelete postReport this postReply with quote Knicks Trade Proposal.
by btrue on Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:22 am

Under Trade ID #4865465 a successful exchange can be made between the Knicks and Kings. The Knicks can send Stephon Marbury, Eddy Curry,and Malik Rose to the Kings in exchange for Brad Miller, Mikki Moore, Bobby Jackon, and Kenny Thomas. I believe this is a good deal for both teams. The kings need a change, Step & Eddy have something to prove. The Knicks need size and more bodies who can actually play. A starting lineup of Harrington, Lee, Miller, Duhon, Richardson is good With Jefferies, Tim Thomas, Moore, Robinson, Chandler off the bench & Jackson and Kenny Thomas as 11th & 12th men. Also we can posibily cut Anthony Roberson and sing Demertius Nichols ifs he is available. The Kings would be ok with Salmons, Hawes, Curry, Marbury, Martin. The Kings do well with this trade because they give up 7yrs of contracts and only take back 4(No player has more 2yrs left on ther deal). The Knicks get more size good outside shooters, and it does noteffect the Knicks plansin 2 yrs to be way under the cap for our LBJ run. BGbtrue
Ballboy

Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:21 pmbtrue
Ballboy

Posts: 2
Joined:

Post #2 » by **pillwenney** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 4:52 am

Please, in the future try to post the trade in a much more readable way.

For those that want something to reject, the trade is:

Marbury
Curry
Rose

for

Miller
Moore
Jackson
Thomas

We pass simply because of Eddy's contract. I wouldn't give it a second thought.

Smills91 · Post #3 » by **Smills91** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 4:56 am

NOONE, I mean NOONE is trading for Eddy Curry this year, and probably not next year either. Maybe the year after that.

Post #4 » by **Luv those Knicks** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:20 am

Smills91 wrote:NOONE, I mean NOONE is trading for Eddy Curry this year, and probably not next year either. Maybe the year after that.

And there's No Way in Heck that the Knicks unload Zach Randolph's monster contract, or they find any takers for Jamal Crawford.

(oh, wait).

tomgugliottamvp · Post #5 » by **tomgugliottamvp** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:01 pm

Well LTK, at least those 2 dudes were actually in shape and playing. curry is fat and rotting on the bench.

as for the trade...why? i just don't see the purpose of it for either team. it really is one of those lose-lose trades.

Post #6 » by **pillwenney** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:19 pm

tomgugliottamvp wrote:Well LTK, at least those 2 dudes were actually in shape and playing. curry is fat and rotting on the bench.

as for the trade...why? i just don't see the purpose of it for either team. it really is one of those lose-lose trades.

Bingo. People can say what they want about the other two, but they were still pretty productive players.