ZonkertheBrainless wrote:why the suspicion? DS comes in, says Tapscott I want to talk to you about my minutes, because I've noticed the trend. What's on your mind? Tapscott says, I know the starting streak is important to you, and it's important to keep a rhythm by having a vet start out the game, but you're shooting slump is really hurting the team and I'm bringing in the younger players to see if they can help us out. DS says well if the reason I'm not getting minutes is my bad shooting, why not bring me off the bench against suckier players and I can get my swagger back and earn back my minutes?
I mean why not? It's not Tapscott asking him permission, they could have had a perfectly believable conversation without either one begging the other for anything and it comes out exactly the way they say it did.
Reasons I can think of Stevenson may have asked to be benched:
+ He is a righteous guy, and knows that his poor play is hurting the team. Therefore, he wants to play less and give other guys who can likely contribute more more minutes.
+ He is a dummy, and is utterly unaware that we have several potential-filled perimeter players that are just waiting for an opportunity like this to seize.
Pretending he did ask for this, there is a very real risk that he's permanently demoting himself in terms of role and minutes. If Young or Crittenton or McGuire steps up and produces, he might well never return to the starting lineup. So, if he did ask for this move, he either is truly a team-first guy, or a dim bulb. And since I don't believe either one of those, I'm choosing to assume that Tap told him he was benched, but spun a nice story about it so he wouldn't look bad. Seems pretty plausible.