choose one player in each category that will have the best fantasy impact this year:
Cream of the Crop:
chad johnson vs marvin harrison vs torry holt
#1 WR borderline #2
boldin vs evans vs houshmandzadeh
middle rounders
braylon edwards vs vincent jackson vs D.J. Hackett
late rounders
gregg jennings vs santonio holmes vs jerry porter
WR pickings: this position might be deeper than anticipated!
Moderator: MadNESS
WR pickings: this position might be deeper than anticipated!
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,678
- And1: 584
- Joined: Sep 19, 2005
-
WR pickings: this position might be deeper than anticipated!
Do not max Vuc!
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
Holt/Housh/Hackett/Holmes
That's a lot of H's
That's a lot of H's
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,678
- And1: 584
- Joined: Sep 19, 2005
-
whosthebosh? wrote:Fitzgerald not even mentioned?
Moss should get touchdowns aplenty this season, they are worth more points than yardage.
I'm not saying these are the only players that are going to do well this year by any means, but they are more or less the players I am highly interested in drafting at some point
Do not max Vuc!
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
Shady Franchise wrote:Thanks...Just out of curiosity, what round should I look at drafting each of the categories?
Holt you should look at around rounds 4-5, depending on the stats your league keeps. Personal rule of thumb: once the run on receivers start, make sure you take him somewhere in the middle of the rush.
Housh (a personal fave) I've drafted early in the past three drafts. Because receivers are easy to find later on, he's usually my #1 receiver on my teams. Rounds 5-7 are where I draft him but, remember, I draft him early.
Hackett may go early thanks to his success last season but if he's around when it comes to taking your third receiver, pounce on him. He's going to have a big year in Seattle.
Holmes is an end-of-draft flier.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 10,689
- And1: 23
- Joined: Jan 12, 2003
- Location: Washington D.C.
Basketball Jesus wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Holt you should look at around rounds 4-5, depending on the stats your league keeps. Personal rule of thumb: once the run on receivers start, make sure you take him somewhere in the middle of the rush.
Housh (a personal fave) I've drafted early in the past three drafts. Because receivers are easy to find later on, he's usually my #1 receiver on my teams. Rounds 5-7 are where I draft him but, remember, I draft him early.
Hackett may go early thanks to his success last season but if he's around when it comes to taking your third receiver, pounce on him. He's going to have a big year in Seattle.
Holmes is an end-of-draft flier.
Don't take advice from this guy! He drafts Brady in the first round! And hasn't won a single RealGM Fantasy Football pool yet
(Not that I have either...)

- b_roy7
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,908
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 11, 2007
- Contact:
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
J.Kim wrote:Don't take advice from this guy! He drafts Brady in the first round! And hasn't won a single RealGM Fantasy Football pool yet
The year I drafted Brady, I had the #10 pick and he outperformed (fantasy-wise) all the RBs taken after him.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.