ImageImageImageImageImage

Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

S.I.C. GM
Veteran
Posts: 2,939
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 31, 2002

Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong 

Post#1 » by S.I.C. GM » Wed Dec 24, 2008 7:20 pm

I know the guy is old, but we need a back up PG. He did a decent job last year. Ager is not doing anything.

Did u see the other in garbage time? CDR was running the point.

Imagine Armstrong and Dooling on a defensive squad. They would give PG and SG fits. Until they post them up.
SIC
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong 

Post#2 » by NetsForce » Wed Dec 24, 2008 10:53 pm

Why not waive Ager and sign me?
Why not waive Ager match the Krstic signing and try and force the Thunder into a sign and trade? (Even if it's just for the right to swap second round picks in the future)
Why not waive Ager... And be thankful that he's gone?

I don't know S.I.C... Down with Ager. That's all I have to say.
User avatar
pistons_in_6
Junior
Posts: 286
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 04, 2008

Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong 

Post#3 » by pistons_in_6 » Thu Dec 25, 2008 5:43 am

armstrong > ager
after he hit the side of the backboard in that preseason game against the heat i have been laughing at him. :lol:
User avatar
Chris Morris
Sophomore
Posts: 173
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 29, 2005

Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong 

Post#4 » by Chris Morris » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:00 pm

Probably because Darrell Armstrong retired.

Let's cut Ager and sign John Stockton.
TRADE ME
Image
User avatar
Serpo
Veteran
Posts: 2,964
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong 

Post#5 » by Serpo » Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:57 pm

Well because the third PG wouldn't play much at all anyways unless ( god forbid ) a serious injury happens to Dooling or Harris . A small amount of Games can be handled with one of the two out and there's just no need to waste money with waiving Ager and his guaranteed money .

A trade would be nice to free up that roster space but who in the world wants that guy and the Nets aren't wasting an asset ( 2nd rounder etc ) just to get rid of him.
User avatar
jerseyjac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,956
And1: 34
Joined: Nov 01, 2001

Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong 

Post#6 » by jerseyjac » Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:55 pm

I just think the Nets are fine w. letting Ager dress up in suits for rest of the season, unless we find a a taker in a unlikely trade scenario...

just to keep in mind, on January 5th...10-day contracts can be signed...dont be surprised if we take advantage of this w. another pg...
S.I.C. GM
Veteran
Posts: 2,939
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 31, 2002

Re: Question: Why not waive Ager and Sign Armstrong 

Post#7 » by S.I.C. GM » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:44 pm

Chris Morris wrote:Probably because Darrell Armstrong retired.

Let's cut Ager and sign John Stockton.


What a stupid remark!

According to your logic, the Celtics should have gotten Karl Malone instead PJ Brown last year.
SIC

Return to Brooklyn Nets