OT:This Team Could Use Starbury And BMiller!

hiphop1 · Post #1 » by **hiphop1** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:32 pm

I think those two players would fit in perfectly. We should sign Marbury if he is bought out and offer this to the Kings.

Boston Incoming
Brad Miller

Sacto Incoming
Scal
TA
House
Baby
Sam

greenbeans · Post #2 » by **greenbeans** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:34 pm

hiphop1 · Post #3 » by **hiphop1** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:35 pm

greenbeans wrote:ewww

You dont think that would make our bench one of the best in the league?

GuyClinch · Post #4 » by **GuyClinch** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:41 pm

Why would the Kings do that deal though? What's Millers contract like?

greenbeans · Post #5 » by **greenbeans** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:41 pm

How? We ship out our whole bench. Unless you have 2 or 3 other guys ready to sign we'd be shot.

hiphop1 · Post #6 » by **hiphop1** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:45 pm

greenbeans wrote:How? We ship out our whole bench. Unless you have 2 or 3 other guys ready to sign we'd be shot.

Giddens,Walker, Croshere?

greenbeans · Post #7 » by **greenbeans** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:51 pm

Hmm....
Rondo/Marbury/Pruitt
Ray/Marbury/Giddens
Pierce/Walker
Garnett/Powe
Perkins/Croshere

I wouldn't mind it if we could get a more proven 2/3.

Dogen · Post #8 » by **Dogen** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 10:16 pm

hiphop1 wrote:I think those two players would fit in perfectly. We should sign Marbury if he is bought out and offer this to the Kings.

Boston Incoming
Brad Miller

Sacto Incoming
Scal
TA
House
Baby
Sam

Give them POB in place of Sam maybe. I'd probably do this if we were going to get Marbury. House has a trade restriction, though, and he's integral to make the numbers work. I think maybe he wouldn't like it!

As to why SAC would do this, IDK.

Hemingway · Post #9 » by **Hemingway** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 11:02 pm

A trade like this would be one of the few scenarios where bringing Antoine back to Boston would make some sense.

31to6 · Post #10 » by **31to6** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 11:03 pm

Can we please not propose 5-for-1 trades?

Especially when the 5 simply = "all of our junk"?

Wasn't the KG trade the *first* ever 5-for-1 in NBA history, and it happened in the offseason, not mid-season?

What would SAC do with our 5 incoming scrubs? Cut them all? They - like just about everyone in the NBA (like us!) - already HAVE a full roster.

Don't you think they can get a bit more value for Brad Miller and his EXPIRING IN 2010 deal than Scal n' friends? Like, I don't know, actual young talent and or draft picks?

THINK, people. It's good for you. And the world.

cisco · Post #11 » by **cisco** » Wed Jan 7, 2009 11:58 pm

greenbeans wrote:Hmm....
Rondo/Marbury/Pruitt
Ray/Marbury/Giddens
Pierce/Walker
Garnett/Powe
Perkins/Croshere

I wouldn't mind it if we could get a more proven 2/3.

Woohoo, Pierce and Walker back together again!

Dogen · Post #12 » by **Dogen** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 12:55 am

31to6 wrote:Can we please not propose 5-for-1 trades?

Especially when the 5 simply = "all of our junk"?

Wasn't the KG trade the *first* ever 5-for-1 in NBA history, and it happened in the offseason, not mid-season?

What would SAC do with our 5 incoming scrubs? Cut them all? They - like just about everyone in the NBA (like us!) - already HAVE a full roster.

Don't you think they can get a bit more value for Brad Miller and his EXPIRING IN 2010 deal than Scal n' friends? Like, I don't know, actual young talent and or draft picks?

THINK, people. It's good for you. And the world.

buzz kill.

cfan79 · Post #13 » by **cfan79** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 3:43 am

greenbeans wrote:Hmm....
Rondo/Marbury/Pruitt
Ray/Marbury/Giddens
Pierce/Walker
Garnett/Powe
Perkins/Croshere

I wouldn't mind it if we could get a more proven 2/3.

You forgot the guy we'd be getting in the trade.

Perkins/Brad Miller/O'Bryant
Garnett/Croshere/Powe
Pierce/Walker
R.Allen/Giddens
Rondo/Marbury/Pruitt

SuigintouEV · Post #14 » by **SuigintouEV** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:07 am

31to6 wrote:Can we please not propose 5-for-1 trades?

Wasn't the KG trade the *first* ever 5-for-1 in NBA history, and it happened in the offseason, not mid-season?

was it?

I thought the barkley trade was 5-for-1

return2glory · Post #15 » by **return2glory** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 10:34 am

hiphop1 wrote:I think those two players would fit in perfectly. We should sign Marbury if he is bought out and offer this to the Kings.

Boston Incoming
Brad Miller

Sacto Incoming
Scal
TA
House
Baby
Sam

Sorry but this is one of the dumbest trades ever made. And I've seen a lot of them. A 5 for 1 trade. The Kings would have 19 players on their roster. You know that they can have no more than 15 right?

Come on hiphop1, you are better than this.

hiphop1 · Post #16 » by **hiphop1** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 1:24 pm

return2glory wrote:
hiphop1 wrote:I think those two players would fit in perfectly. We should sign Marbury if he is bought out and offer this to the Kings.

Boston Incoming
Brad Miller

Sacto Incoming
Scal
TA
House
Baby
Sam

Sorry but this is one of the dumbest trades ever made. And I've seen a lot of them. A 5 for 1 trade. The Kings would have 19 players on their roster. You know that they can have no more than 15 right?

Come on hiphop1, you are better than this.

Yeah I wrote it at work bored, 5 for 1's never really happen. Maybe they would cut Sam and Baby. LOL