Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,293
- And1: 128
- Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
yea no fancy thread but w/e
Yi is getting the VC treatment in Milwuakee.
Yi is getting the VC treatment in Milwuakee.
Re: Nets @ Bucks
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,711
- And1: 29
- Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Re: Nets @ Bucks
I refuse to lose to the Bucks. Nets I don't care if Harris is not playing... DON'T YOU DARE LOSE TO THE BUCKS! DON'T YOU DARE!!!
Re: Nets @ Bucks
-
- Senior
- Posts: 586
- And1: 20
- Joined: Dec 08, 2008
Re: Nets @ Bucks
Bucks are up 61-49 at halftime. Redd is torching us with 19 points already.
C'mon Nets let's play some D. Same goes for VC. Don't be too unselfish. 7 shots in one half are simply not enough for your talent and calibre.
C'mon Nets let's play some D. Same goes for VC. Don't be too unselfish. 7 shots in one half are simply not enough for your talent and calibre.
Re: Nets @ Bucks
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,570
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 14, 2006
Re: Nets @ Bucks
it's not Vince's fault at all..they're trapping him on every possession, because Frank keeps running pick and rolls..
when they're running corner isolation plays, he's scoring..when they run the pick and roll, VC gets trapped, forcing others to beat them..it's been happening all game..
when they're running corner isolation plays, he's scoring..when they run the pick and roll, VC gets trapped, forcing others to beat them..it's been happening all game..
Re: Nets @ Bucks
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,570
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 14, 2006
Re: Nets @ Bucks
...and Dooling loses the ball to Luke Ridnour when the Nets have a chance at the tie LOL Luke **** Ridnour..I hate these scrubs on the Bucks(which is pretty much the entire Bucks team, actually)..
Re: Nets @ Bucks
- Da big3
- Starter
- Posts: 2,405
- And1: 2
- Joined: Nov 29, 2007
- Location: #hellobrooklyn
Re: Nets @ Bucks
Bobby Simmons!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! wtf...
Re: Nets @ Bucks
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,570
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 14, 2006
Re: Nets @ Bucks
LOL Bobby Simmons!!!..
9 seconds left though..
9 seconds left though..
Re: Nets @ Bucks
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,528
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 06, 2005
- Location: NYC
Re: Nets @ Bucks
Simmons giveth and Simmons taketh
Re: Nets @ Bucks
- Da big3
- Starter
- Posts: 2,405
- And1: 2
- Joined: Nov 29, 2007
- Location: #hellobrooklyn
Re: Nets @ Bucks
a give and take by bobby simmons...
Re: Nets @ Bucks
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,293
- And1: 128
- Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Re: Nets @ Bucks
****** $%#^# *%&&$ %@@%%# ^^^$&&%&#*!*@ $
Re: Nets @ Bucks
- Da big3
- Starter
- Posts: 2,405
- And1: 2
- Joined: Nov 29, 2007
- Location: #hellobrooklyn
Re: Nets @ Bucks
of all people luke Ridnour, did anyone think that there was extra time left?...
Re: Nets @ Bucks
- Da big3
- Starter
- Posts: 2,405
- And1: 2
- Joined: Nov 29, 2007
- Location: #hellobrooklyn
Re: Nets @ Bucks
VCRJKidd15 wrote:****** $%#^# *%&&$ %@@%%# ^^^$&&%&#*!*@ $
point understood

Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
- Rich Rane
- Senior Mod - Nets
- Posts: 36,950
- And1: 15,619
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
-
Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
Man, we hit a good amount of game winners this season, it was just a matter of time someone hit one against us.
- Forget about utilizing the pick-and-roll, we still can't defend it. The entire game along with the final Ridnour shot, we don't when to switch off, stay, or even pick up when someone gets beat. It's always good to come back when we're down by double digits, but let's face it, if we didn't hit our threes, this would've had a good chance of being discouraging.
- Is Anderson still on the team? I mean, Najera did well dishing the ball, Simmons shot the 3-ball well, but he should be getting Hassell's minutes.
- We used Brook horribly in this game.
- We needed Harris and Yi in there for the 4th.
- Hope Yi is fine.
- Why did TOR let Villanueva go again?
- Forget about utilizing the pick-and-roll, we still can't defend it. The entire game along with the final Ridnour shot, we don't when to switch off, stay, or even pick up when someone gets beat. It's always good to come back when we're down by double digits, but let's face it, if we didn't hit our threes, this would've had a good chance of being discouraging.
- Is Anderson still on the team? I mean, Najera did well dishing the ball, Simmons shot the 3-ball well, but he should be getting Hassell's minutes.
- We used Brook horribly in this game.
- We needed Harris and Yi in there for the 4th.
- Hope Yi is fine.
- Why did TOR let Villanueva go again?
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
- njnetsballaaa
- Sophomore
- Posts: 134
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 21, 2007
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
Why would Lawrence Frank run that play? Of course the Bucks were expecting VC to get the ball so why not pass it to Hayes for the last shot? Goodness.
Another Lawrence Frank FAIL.
Another Lawrence Frank FAIL.
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
- Oct 16th 1968
- Junior
- Posts: 490
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 18, 2008
- Location: Bucks slippers warm your feets
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
- NjNeTs1029
- Starter
- Posts: 2,408
- And1: 98
- Joined: Jan 28, 2007
-
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
that last play was awful
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
- Rich Rane
- Senior Mod - Nets
- Posts: 36,950
- And1: 15,619
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
-
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
Oct 16th 1968 wrote:Yi broke his finger. Out a couple weeks...
That's tough. He finally put a string of good games and it'll be hard to work his way back into Frank's rotation again.
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
- Rich Rane
- Senior Mod - Nets
- Posts: 36,950
- And1: 15,619
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
-
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
I also forgot...turnovers killed us. Bucks capitalized over and over again.
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
- lurkingobeiscity
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,263
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 15, 2004
- Location: left field
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
njnetsballaaa wrote:Why would Lawrence Frank run that play? Of course the Bucks were expecting VC to get the ball so why not pass it to Hayes for the last shot? Goodness.
Another Lawrence Frank FAIL.
That again wasn't on Frank. Hayes was open at the top of the key for a shot and the in-bounder tried to force it to VC instead.
Najera played like **** today. As always he was a non-factor in the set offense but he was continually leaving his man (Villanueva) trying to force turnovers, and all the Bucks had to do was swing the ball for an open shot.
Tough for Yi to go out after what looked like his best stretch of games in his career. Hopefully he comes back aggressive, and at least it is only a pinky so he can still practice.

Enetric wrote:Although Brook is close....despite the fact that he may be the weirdest guy in the league. Love the voice...(one time...me and Robin were in a tickle fight...and I was like...Robin...stop teasing me...)
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 33
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 30, 2008
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 102 Bucks 104 Final
Rich Rane said- We used Brook horribly in this game.
Agree. With Bogut out, you would think we would throw the ball down to Brook more.
- Why did TOR let Villanueva go again?
Toronto treated him for TJ Ford. Villanueva is a talented scorer but a selfish player who does not play defense. Hammond has been shopping him around since the summer with no taker despite how inexpensive his contract is.