ImageImageImageImage

What kind of year will Randy Moss have?

Moderator: Parliament10

What kind of season will Randy Moss have w/ Pats?

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,785
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Location: The future

What kind of year will Randy Moss have? 

Post#1 » by Dirty Water » Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:57 pm

Generally speaking, what kind of season will Moss have with the Pats?
User avatar
Pierce 4 3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,710
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Location: Wherever there is money to steal

 

Post#2 » by Pierce 4 3 » Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:56 pm

I think Moss will have an in between average and fair season, because he's always gonna be double covered/triple covered which will open up the pass better for Watson, Thomas, Maroney, Welker, Stallworth, etc. and since brady's primary receiver is the open receiver, the only time brady is gonna pass to moss is if it's 3rd & 23 and he has to throw the long ball or moss is just able to burn the safety or corner or both.
User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,785
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Location: The future

 

Post#3 » by Dirty Water » Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:01 pm

I don't think the Patriots will be seeing many 3rd and 23s this season... just a hunch.
Boston's Future
Pro Prospect
Posts: 791
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Plymouth/Springfield, MA

 

Post#4 » by Boston's Future » Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:35 pm

I honeslty think the guy will make the Pro Bowl. I got a feeling that big things are gonna happen between Moss and Brady. I'm seeing like 70 receptions, 10000 yards and 12 TD's. Its gonna be awesome
EG4life
Junior
Posts: 353
And1: 31
Joined: Apr 23, 2007
       

 

Post#5 » by EG4life » Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:12 pm

solid not spectacular
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#6 » by sunshinekids99 » Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:14 pm

I'm thinking 65 balls or so. But the TD's will be high 8+, his size will greatly help in goalline.
Image
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#7 » by Bleeding Green » Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:52 pm

10,000 yards might be stretching it a bit given that the field is only 100 yards long, but I agree with B'sF.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
Boston's Future
Pro Prospect
Posts: 791
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Location: Plymouth/Springfield, MA

 

Post#8 » by Boston's Future » Mon Jul 30, 2007 1:57 am

Whoops, 1,000 yards... lol.. anyway I imagine that Brady will be lobbing a decent amount of balls up to Moss near the goal line, which is something i haven't really seen him do a lot before, b/c well, the pats haven't really had any tall recievers ever.
User avatar
Pierce 4 3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,710
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Location: Wherever there is money to steal

 

Post#9 » by Pierce 4 3 » Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:03 pm

Ghost of the Garden wrote:I don't think the Patriots will be seeing many 3rd and 23s this season... just a hunch.

i know, i'm just saying
User avatar
bru87tr
Rookie
Posts: 1,051
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Location: Title Town!!!

 

Post#10 » by bru87tr » Thu Aug 2, 2007 4:27 pm

whats the update on moss hamstring problem ?
User avatar
U2larkin04
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,532
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: Portsmouth, RI

 

Post#11 » by U2larkin04 » Thu Aug 2, 2007 5:43 pm

He will be the number 1 reciever on the team, playing for the best QB in the league... I think he'll have a pro bowl year IF healthy. I think that plays in now this whole hamstring thing came about.
Image
User avatar
wetsthebed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 33,421
And1: 2,242
Joined: Jul 11, 2005
Location: asl?
       

 

Post#12 » by wetsthebed » Fri Aug 3, 2007 12:19 am

I'm thinking 20,000 yards.
Image
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#13 » by Basketball Jesus » Sun Aug 5, 2007 2:36 pm

50 receptions, 700-850 yards, 8 TDs sounds about right.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
CDB
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,515
And1: 1
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Dont Hate because Phil is styling on ya!

 

Post#14 » by CDB » Sun Aug 5, 2007 10:33 pm

I got him having a great year(leading in rec, yds, TD's) but just short of the Pro-Bowl.
User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,785
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Location: The future

 

Post#15 » by Dirty Water » Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:03 pm

He has already exceeded my expectations. I thought 65 rec/ 5 TDs...

already has 8 TDs...
User avatar
l2RDO
Junior
Posts: 484
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2007

 

Post#16 » by l2RDO » Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:37 pm

Hes pretty much passed everyones expectations I think, especially Oakland's.
cb4_89
RealGM
Posts: 27,650
And1: 517
Joined: Oct 02, 2004
       

 

Post#17 » by cb4_89 » Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:55 pm

thats why oakland sucks
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#18 » by Bleeding Green » Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:54 am

Basketball Jesus wrote:50 receptions, 700-850 yards, 8 TDs sounds about right.

No, season. As in the whole 16 games.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#19 » by Basketball Jesus » Fri Oct 19, 2007 12:32 pm

Oh, I thought we were talking about his game against the Dolphins.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
TheCelticTruth
Analyst
Posts: 3,092
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Location: You Can't Handle the Truth, the real city of champions, again.

 

Post#20 » by TheCelticTruth » Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:49 am

cb4_89 wrote:thats why oakland sucks


i love that art shell and tom walsh were fired for leading a team with at least average talent to a 2-14 record, both of whom are mediocre at best and that was probably more due to their early careers, and somehow they still had credible football analysis skills. they couldnt give the guy even a marginally acceptable quarterback to play with, and hes the only one on the 6-26 team who has "eroding skills". everyone else is good, its just randy thats bad
Image

Sig by twolves4ever
Boston-Syracuse-North Carolina, Screw Duke and BC
"ubuntu"

Return to New England Patriots