DowJones wrote:Chris Broussard on ESPN (one guy I really like on their network) said 2 interesting things regarding Cleveland...
1. The Kings offered Brad Miller for Wally and Cleveland turned it down. Now he did not mention anything about other pieces (1st rounder, Hickson, etc) but that doesn't mean that they wouldn't be part of the deal.
2. Cleveland is really interested in Mike Miller but Minnesota isn't sure they want to dump him now. CB did speculate that the TWolves would likely be inclined to move Miller as the deadline gets closer.
I think a deal involving Miller, Cardinal, and maybe someone like Craig Smith might be able to get done as the deadline gets closer.
Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,282
- And1: 19,289
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
I apologize for not finding a link to ESPN, but I thought I'd bring this over because it's of general interest to people here.
Re: Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 112
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 14, 2008
Re: Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
I would rather tag on Rashad McCants than Craig Smith but I would do this:
Min Gets-
C Anderson Varejao
F Wally Szczerbiak
[Maybe JJ Hickson or thier first]
CLE Gets-
G Mike Miller
F Craig Smith
F Brian Cardinal
Min Gets-
C Anderson Varejao
F Wally Szczerbiak
[Maybe JJ Hickson or thier first]
CLE Gets-
G Mike Miller
F Craig Smith
F Brian Cardinal
Re: Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
Kevin_Love_42 wrote:I would rather tag on Rashad McCants than Craig Smith but I would do this:
Min Gets-
C Anderson Varejao
F Wally Szczerbiak
[Maybe JJ Hickson or thier first]
CLE Gets-
G Mike Miller
F Craig Smith
F Brian Cardinal
Cleveland definately says no to that, even without Hickson or a first.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
- deeney0
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,594
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jan 26, 2005
- Location: Cambridge, MA
Re: Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
Yeah, Cavs are quite fond of AV, and he's not an essential piece in the trade from my point of view.
Re: Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
- Vindicater
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,948
- And1: 423
- Joined: Apr 11, 2004
Re: Wolves Unsure About Trading Miller?
Miller has been very good for us since coming off the bench
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves