Image Image Image Image

The Bears have the oldest O-Line in the NFL

Moderator: chitownsports4ever

fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 69,509
And1: 36,964
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

The Bears have the oldest O-Line in the NFL 

Post#1 » by fleet » Mon Aug 6, 2007 7:55 pm

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/mulligan ... 06.article

The Bears will field the oldest offensive line in football this season. Would it be more polite to say most veteran or most experienced?
''We might be the oldest, but we're also the best,'' offensive line coach Harry Hiestand said.

In what sounds like some kind of sinister countdown, left guard Ruben Brown is 35, right tackle Fred Miller 34, left tackle John Tait 32, center Olin Kreutz 30 and right guard Roberto Garza 28. The top two reserves are tackle John St. Clair, 30, and guard Terrence Metcalf, 29.

Old but experienced
The average age of the Bears' starting five is 31.8, which puts them ahead of Denver (31.6), Kansas City (31.2) and Washington (30.2). All five of the Chiefs' projected starters are at least 30, while the Redskins have four starters at least 30 and center Casey Rabach, who will hit that age in September. Only four teams project a starting lineup devoid of at least one starting offensive lineman 30 or older: Arizona, Buffalo, Cleveland and Detroit.
Where the Bears' offensive line really stands alone is in years of experience and games started. While 18 of the league's 32 offensive lines start at least one player with a minimum of 10 years of NFL experience, the Bears' five starters combine for 51 seasons with a league-high 603 combined starts.



but they sure remind me of Jimbo, Hilgy, Thayer, Bortz, and VanHorn.

Can't help but to worry about rebuilding this line soon though. Probably with kids, and with picks at the bottom of rounds. They can't sign FA O-Linemen any more.
You know the money for the Offense is going to be tied up in the skill positions soon, And as it is, the Bears might not be able to pay Berrian if he has a great year. They'll have to pay Grossman, redo Urlacher, resign Harris etc. You can suresee why they can't long term Briggs

I'm wondering where the Bears are going to unload salary just for taking care of Berrian, Grossman, Harris and Urlacher. Maybe Moose and 'Wale.

You might expect the Bears to be heavily drafting O-Linemen starting next season. You might also expect the Bears to begin to transfer money out of the O-Line into the skill positions by next year
chibearsfan
Junior
Posts: 481
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 06, 2006

 

Post#2 » by chibearsfan » Mon Aug 6, 2007 8:49 pm

I think we may see some changes after this year to resign Harris, Grossman (pending a good year), and Berrian. I'm not so hot on extending Urlacher's contract as we already have him long term. I could see Wale being outta here soon along with Brown. Hopefully Anderson, Bazuin, and a rookie can fill that void. Moose may also be gone to make room for the new class of Berrian, Bradley, Hester and Davis (although neither of those last 3 should demand new contract, maybe Hester). Bottom line is we got plenty of aging contracts who are expendable for the younger guys.
Howling Mad
General Manager
Posts: 9,043
And1: 624
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

 

Post#3 » by Howling Mad » Mon Aug 6, 2007 9:08 pm

Wale and Brown will end up going and hopefully we can get an O linemen along with the transaction.

Moose is someone I would like to have around for the young guys, I can deff see him restructuring his contract; hes a pro he would do it.
User avatar
NoSkyy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,014
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 20, 2007

 

Post#4 » by NoSkyy » Tue Aug 7, 2007 2:48 am

Lucky for us, Olin Kreutz is willing to teach and mentor young offensive lineman. I think that's a great advantage of an old offensive line.
User avatar
tclg
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,194
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2007
Location: Chicago

 

Post#5 » by tclg » Tue Aug 7, 2007 11:01 am

Hopefully we can transition to a younger line one position at a time
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

 

Post#6 » by Cliff Levingston » Tue Aug 7, 2007 4:53 pm

This is why Cliff Levingston wanted some good backups in the offseason. Metcalf and St. Clair = not so good backups.

If Tait or Kruetz go down, we're ficked.
chibearsfan
Junior
Posts: 481
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 06, 2006

 

Post#7 » by chibearsfan » Tue Aug 7, 2007 5:32 pm

[quote="Cliff Levingston"]This is why Cliff Levingston wanted some good backups in the offseason. Metcalf and St. Clair = not so good backups.

If Tait or Kruetz go down, we're ficked.[/quote]

Yeah, true.
transplant
RealGM
Posts: 11,734
And1: 3,419
Joined: Aug 16, 2001
Location: state of perpetual confusion
       

 

Post#8 » by transplant » Wed Aug 8, 2007 8:58 pm

Cliff Levingston wrote:This is why Cliff Levingston wanted some good backups in the offseason. Metcalf and St. Clair = not so good backups.

If Tait or Kruetz go down, we're ficked.


They're about as good as most backup linemen, but yeah, Tait and Kruetz need to stay healthy.

Return to Chicago Bears