McGrady for Redd

Hillbilly · Post #1 » by **Hillbilly** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:07 am

What do you think of this trade?
Mcgrady
Landry
Head

for

Redd
Villanueva
Jones, D

Our starting five and back ups would be.
Alston / Brooks
Redd / Wafer / Barry / Jones
Battier / Artest
Scola / Villanueva / Hayes
Yao / Deke

After the season we would only have the following players under contract.
Alston / Brooks
Redd / Barry
Battier
Scola / Dorsey / Hayes
Yao

The biggest challenge will be if T Mac can come back and play well before the deadline to make this trade. Just think how goo we would be right no if we would have traded him and Head to Detroit for Billups and Prince over the summer.

HTown_TMac · Post #2 » by **HTown_TMac** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:21 am

How many time shall we say no?

I am tired of redd for t-mac deals... We rather see what T-Mac has

YoungMoney23 · Post #3 » by **YoungMoney23** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:05 am

HTown_TMac wrote:How many time shall we say no?

I am tired of redd for t-mac deals... We rather see what T-Mac has

amen to that

langer · Post #4 » by **langer** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:15 am

hell no, we don't need any stats whore.

Iggyemu · Post #5 » by **Iggyemu** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:50 am

Hillbilly huh.

Baller 24 · Post #6 » by **Baller 24** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:53 am

Worse of a defender, passer, rebounder, and this season his percentages aren't even close to being pretty. Plus his contract sucks pretty dam bad, the Houston Rockets Organization isn't stupid, nor are the fans.

jzmagik · Post #7 » by **jzmagik** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:10 am

Baller 24 wrote:Worse of a defender, passer, rebounder, and this season his percentages aren't even close to being pretty. Plus his contract sucks pretty dam bad, the Houston Rockets Organization isn't stupid, nor are the fans.

Not sure what you're talking about with the percentages. He's shooting 45.5 from the field, 37.0 from 3s, that is very good efficiency.

dunleavyjr · Post #8 » by **dunleavyjr** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:34 am

It has to be Andre Iguodala or no trade :-p

moofs · Post #9 » by **moofs** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:20 am

STOP.
WITH
THE
SILLY/LUDICROUS/DUMB
MCGRADY
TRADE
THREADS.

Post #10 » by **TMU** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:26 am

I like Landry over Villanueva. So, no deal.

Hillbilly · Post #11 » by **Hillbilly** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:29 am

Anyone that wants to keep Mcgrady, must like loosing. We need players with heart and in case you didn't know T mac doesn't have one.

mackzone · Post #12 » by **mackzone** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:59 am

you're a moron, just in case you didn't know

red96 · Post #13 » by **red96** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:28 pm

Hillbilly wrote:Anyone that wants to keep Mcgrady, must like loosing. We need players with heart and in case you didn't know T mac doesn't have one.

And with this trade we really do get 3 players who're overflowing with heart :lol:

.

red96 · Post #14 » by **red96** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:29 pm

Hillbilly wrote:Anyone that wants to keep Mcgrady, must like loosing. We need players with heart and in case you didn't know T mac doesn't have one.

And with this trade we really do get 3 players who're overflowing with heart :lol:

.

HTown_TMac · Post #15 » by **HTown_TMac** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:55 pm

People need to pre-read before the hit 'submit'

Redd, Charlie V, and Damon Jones = ?
I bet their work is not even harder than t-macs...

Any Rockets fans who are willing to give up T-Mac for trash like this has hit the panic button and forgot how good he actually is. Maybe he didn't rehab right this offseason, but that was his only problem, so he should come back and play well... Remember those games earlier season? He had triple-double and was like an assist shy of 2 more? Just give him time, he is more valuable.

Baller 24 · Post #16 » by **Baller 24** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:00 pm

jzmagik wrote:
Baller 24 wrote:Worse of a defender, passer, rebounder, and this season his percentages aren't even close to being pretty. Plus his contract sucks pretty dam bad, the Houston Rockets Organization isn't stupid, nor are the fans.

Not sure what you're talking about with the percentages. He's shooting 45.5 from the field, 37.0 from 3s, that is very good efficiency.

Yah I was talking about his percentages, but I haven't seen them lately, he started out the season shooting like 41% from the field, but still his contract is pretty ridiculous along with some of the other things he doesn't bring.

Post #17 » by **TMU** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:06 pm

Michael Redd has a players option in 10/11.

HTown_TMac · Post #18 » by **HTown_TMac** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:25 pm

T-Mac United wrote:Michael Redd has a players option in 10/11.

Doesnt help us. I think we like 09/10

Post #19 » by **TMU** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:27 pm

HTown_TMac wrote:
T-Mac United wrote:Michael Redd has a players option in 10/11.

Doesnt help us. I think we like 09/10

Exactly. We'll be well below the cap in '10. Hence, no to Redd.

HTown_TMac · Post #20 » by **HTown_TMac** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:40 pm

I understand