Poll: Mascot or No Mas-not?

Cyclical · Post #1 » by **Cyclical** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:57 pm

OK, that was a cheesy title.

I'm personally not a fan of mascots in professional sports. Seems tacky and juvenile... More high school and college appropriate. Hey, personally I'd do away with cheerleaders (not execute them, just send them home; my home preferably) but I guess it's the 21st century and I have to reluctantly get with the times.

Still, I know a lot of people liked Lucky and just dig the entertainment value. So, which way do the Celts go?

FederalePDT · Post #2 » by **FederalePDT** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:34 pm

I think mascots in general are pretty dumb, but I have the luxury of having a good team to watch which makes the mascot irrelevant.

Lets not forget how before 2007-2008, more often than not Lucky was the show, and entertained thousands in crappy blow out games when everyone was miserable. So sooner or later there will be a new mascot I'm sure.

bruno sundov · Post #3 » by **bruno sundov** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:32 pm

We don't need a mascot.

Post #4 » by **wetsthebed** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:30 am

I liked Lucky more than most mascots. Probably because he wasn't a guy in a dumb Disneyland costume. But I'd rather just go with no mascot.