Fitz wow

Moderator: bwgood77

User avatar
Amen316
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,979
And1: 4
Joined: Dec 30, 2005

Fitz wow 

Post#1 » by Amen316 » Mon Feb 2, 2009 7:31 am

Fitzgerald was about to be placed in the realm of Jerry Rice all in about two minutes. When Pittsburgh marched back down and stole his history, thunder, and limelight.

Incredible hands, route running, and something special just at his side!
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,019
And1: 19,942
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#2 » by NO-KG-AI » Mon Feb 2, 2009 7:51 pm

Don't wanna rain on the parade, but he was invisible until the 4th quarter. Just saying.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,315
And1: 12,163
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#3 » by Worm Guts » Mon Feb 2, 2009 7:56 pm

Yeah, who wants their big plays in 4th quarter?
7 catches, 127 yards and 2 TD's. That's a heck of a game no matter how it was distributed.
User avatar
MadCityBucky
General Manager
Posts: 9,873
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 21, 2007

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#4 » by MadCityBucky » Mon Feb 2, 2009 8:27 pm

Great player, unbelievable playoff performance.

Not to rain on his parade but I would take two players over him right now, after Calvin Johnson and Andre Johnson. Just my personal preference. All three are premier wide receivers and equally as talented, though I think Calvin and Andre have more physical talent.
BiggMann
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,832
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 13, 2003
Location: Energy Solutions Arena

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#5 » by BiggMann » Mon Feb 2, 2009 9:44 pm

MadCityBucky wrote:Great player, unbelievable playoff performance.

Not to rain on his parade but I would take two players over him right now, after Calvin Johnson and Andre Johnson. Just my personal preference. All three are premier wide receivers and equally as talented, though I think Calvin and Andre have more physical talent.



WOW :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'll take Larry any day! Dude plays with heart!
Bye Bye Sloan, Good Riddance Deron. Hello new Era in Jazz Basketball.
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,657
And1: 2,185
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#6 » by High 5 » Mon Feb 2, 2009 9:46 pm

Calvin Johnson sure, but I'd take Fitzgerald over Johnson without a second thought.

What an epic post season. A couple of minutes away from being the best ever.
User avatar
MadCityBucky
General Manager
Posts: 9,873
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 21, 2007

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#7 » by MadCityBucky » Mon Feb 2, 2009 10:03 pm

BiggMann wrote:
MadCityBucky wrote:Great player, unbelievable playoff performance.

Not to rain on his parade but I would take two players over him right now, after Calvin Johnson and Andre Johnson. Just my personal preference. All three are premier wide receivers and equally talented, though I think Calvin and Andre have more physical talent.



WOW :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'll take Larry any day! Dude plays with heart!


So does a lot of NFL players, like Donald Driver and Hines Ward, what's your point?

You're saying Megatron and Andre don't play with heart? I guess you've never seen them play.

Why do I believe Andre is better? Because he doesn't have a Breaston, Boldin, Warner. Yet he produces great numbers. Plus he is more physically talented imo but I'm no scout.

So give a valid argument besides the guy plays with heart because they both do, unless you've never seen Andre play :roll: . I said both these players are extremely talented and I can see why one might choose one over another.
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#8 » by casey » Mon Feb 2, 2009 10:12 pm

I'm not sure how you could pick anybody over Fitzgerald after what he did in the playoffs. It ain't close right now.
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio
User avatar
MadCityBucky
General Manager
Posts: 9,873
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 21, 2007

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#9 » by MadCityBucky » Mon Feb 2, 2009 10:34 pm

Breaking records for catches, yards and touchdowns in a single postseason is damn impressive.

Fitz is just so technically sound, with excellent body control, technique, route running and hands.

He may be the best receiver today but my thought of mind is that Megatron and Andre will become (if they're not already) as good. Just my personal opinion and hindsight.
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#10 » by J.Kim » Tue Feb 3, 2009 1:10 am

casey wrote:I'm not sure how you could pick anybody over Fitzgerald after what he did in the playoffs. It ain't close right now.


Even a mediocre player is bound to make some plays if he's thrown at as much as the Cardinals throw the ball...

I'm not saying Fitzgerald is a mediocre player by any means, but you've gotta take numbers in to perspective, and not take a narrow-minded approach to it.

He's a great player, but he also benefits from a pass-heavy offense that targets its receivers a lot more than any other team in the league.

However, I'd only take Andre Johnson over Larry Fitzgerald. Out of all the WRs in the league, I don't think I've seen one like Andre Johnson where he can attract triple teams and yet still come up with a grab despite being it heavily contested. I've seen Nick Harper on the under coverage and Hope and Griffin on each side of the over coverage and yet Johnson could still come up with the grab. Those kind of plays have left a fairly big impression in my mind.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,019
And1: 19,942
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#11 » by NO-KG-AI » Tue Feb 3, 2009 5:29 am

And I think Andre is super overrated right now. This year was the first year he really put up numbers like an elite receiver, and he still hasn't cracked 8 TD's. I think your judgment is clouded by that monster game he had against the Titans :lol:
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#12 » by J.Kim » Tue Feb 3, 2009 5:41 am

NO-KG-AI wrote:And I think Andre is super overrated right now. This year was the first year he really put up numbers like an elite receiver, and he still hasn't cracked 8 TD's. I think your judgment is clouded by that monster game he had against the Titans :lol:


Andre Johnson DYAR = 489
Next best DYAR = 416 (Roddy White)

Andre Johnson was head and shoulders above all other receivers this season.

FO has moved its historic data to its premium section, but if IIRC, Andre Johnson has placed ahead of Larry Fitzgerald almost every year, and has usually been the cream of the crop in WRs in the past couple of years...
HCYanks
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,427
And1: 2
Joined: May 24, 2002

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#13 » by HCYanks » Tue Feb 3, 2009 5:48 am

NO-KG-AI wrote:And I think Andre is super overrated right now. This year was the first year he really put up numbers like an elite receiver, and he still hasn't cracked 8 TD's. I think your judgment is clouded by that monster game he had against the Titans :lol:


No, Andre really was awesome this year. And he did it on a team with a lesser quarterback that actually put together a usable run game. Calling the poor guy super overrated is kinda mind-boggling to me.
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,006
And1: 4,458
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#14 » by LAKESHOW » Tue Feb 3, 2009 6:01 am

lynn swann probably had the greatest performance.
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
HCYanks
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,427
And1: 2
Joined: May 24, 2002

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#15 » by HCYanks » Tue Feb 3, 2009 6:02 am

J.Kim wrote:
NO-KG-AI wrote:And I think Andre is super overrated right now. This year was the first year he really put up numbers like an elite receiver, and he still hasn't cracked 8 TD's. I think your judgment is clouded by that monster game he had against the Titans :lol:


Andre Johnson DYAR = 489
Next best DYAR = 416 (Roddy White)

Andre Johnson was head and shoulders above all other receivers this season.

FO has moved its historic data to its premium section, but if IIRC, Andre Johnson has placed ahead of Larry Fitzgerald almost every year, and has usually been the cream of the crop in WRs in the past couple of years...


The basic stuff is still there, the design is just more cumbersome for some stupid reason (you have to choose on the pick position box first before the years will work).

DYAR/DVOA give Fitz the advantage in 05 and 06, but DVOA liked Johnson a lot more in 07 and Andre was ahead of everybody in 08.

Fitzgerald's an elite receiver, without a doubt. But it's becoming annoying how he's getting treated as a generational talent when there's a guy over in Houston who can at least give Larry a run for his money.
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#16 » by J.Kim » Tue Feb 3, 2009 6:08 am

HCYanks wrote:
J.Kim wrote:
NO-KG-AI wrote:And I think Andre is super overrated right now. This year was the first year he really put up numbers like an elite receiver, and he still hasn't cracked 8 TD's. I think your judgment is clouded by that monster game he had against the Titans :lol:


Andre Johnson DYAR = 489
Next best DYAR = 416 (Roddy White)

Andre Johnson was head and shoulders above all other receivers this season.

FO has moved its historic data to its premium section, but if IIRC, Andre Johnson has placed ahead of Larry Fitzgerald almost every year, and has usually been the cream of the crop in WRs in the past couple of years...


The basic stuff is still there, the design is just more cumbersome for some stupid reason (you have to choose on the pick position box first before the years will work).

DYAR/DVOA give Fitz the advantage in 05 and 06, but DVOA liked Johnson a lot more in 07 and Andre was ahead of everybody in 08.

Fitzgerald's an elite receiver, without a doubt. But it's becoming annoying how he's getting treated as a generational talent when there's a guy over in Houston who can at least give Larry a run for his money.


Indeed.
Andre Johnson is every bit as talented as Larry Fitzgerald, or maybe even more so. If he played on a pass-heavy team with as much passing talent as Arizona, he could put up just as good,or even exceed the raw numbers that Fitzgerald puts up.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,315
And1: 12,163
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#17 » by Worm Guts » Tue Feb 3, 2009 1:28 pm

HCYanks wrote:
Fitzgerald's an elite receiver, without a doubt. But it's becoming annoying how he's getting treated as a generational talent when there's a guy over in Houston who can at least give Larry a run for his money.



I'm not sure Fitzgerald is being treated like a generational talent. He's being treated like someone who had a generational performance, which he did.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,315
And1: 12,163
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#18 » by Worm Guts » Tue Feb 3, 2009 1:32 pm

J.Kim wrote:
casey wrote:I'm not sure how you could pick anybody over Fitzgerald after what he did in the playoffs. It ain't close right now.


Even a mediocre player is bound to make some plays if he's thrown at as much as the Cardinals throw the ball...

I'm not saying Fitzgerald is a mediocre player by any means, but you've gotta take numbers in to perspective, and not take a narrow-minded approach to it.

He's a great player, but he also benefits from a pass-heavy offense that targets its receivers a lot more than any other team in the league.

.


Those arguments might work for regular season numbers, but not in the playoffs. He put up huge numbers against good/great defenses and his team won 3 out of 4. These aren't inflated numbers.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,019
And1: 19,942
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#19 » by NO-KG-AI » Tue Feb 3, 2009 7:03 pm

Eh, there's a big difference in DYAR between the top 5 and everyone else, and I don't think Roddy White and Vincent Jackson are top 5 receivers. Seems to penalize the guys in pass heavy offenses too much, even if they aren't getting thrown too so heavily.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
lpsevier
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,367
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

Re: Fitz wow 

Post#20 » by lpsevier » Tue Feb 3, 2009 8:41 pm

NO-KG-AI wrote:Eh, there's a big difference in DYAR between the top 5 and everyone else, and I don't think Roddy White and Vincent Jackson are top 5 receivers. Seems to penalize the guys in pass heavy offenses too much, even if they aren't getting thrown too so heavily.



per Roddy:

2 games, 15 catches, 23 targets, 232 yards

That was against NO.

8-)

Just sayin.... :wink:

Return to The General NFL Board