ImageImageImage

is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated?

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#1 » by revprodeji » Fri Feb 6, 2009 5:02 pm

If not a liability?

this is random but work with me.

1.) in the past decade has there been anymore busts than drafting a 7ft too early?

2.) is it just chance that yao, bynum, oden seem to not stay healthy? bynum has had 2 serious knee injuries, yao is constantly injuried and oden had microfracture. if ur team is built around these beasts then at any moment the common injury could stop your season. even shaq had huge injury issues. is there a legit 7ft 300beast that starts that has not struggled with injuries?

is there something with the current nba game that hurts the big monster? perhaps we wil see more teams going with 2 pf and bringing a 7ft monster off the bench for 20min.

anyone else notice this?
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
Chance1117
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,252
And1: 23
Joined: Jul 24, 2003

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#2 » by Chance1117 » Fri Feb 6, 2009 5:22 pm

There does seem to be lots of "Monsters" with injury problems.

For one the human knee is just not plain made to carry that much weight. I'm 6'5'' myself and because of that I'm more likely to injury. The cartilage in a 100lb 5'0'' girls knee is about the same as Yao's. There is also just the mechanical problem that the longer the appendage the more torque.

Also you have to think the taller the player is the less people there are like them. Like I said before I'm 6'5'' that make me taller then 99% of the people. So when you are reaching the height of 7'0'' these people are just about 1 in a million! The chances of someone being that tall and athletic are slim. Seems most centers are very raw and lets face it not talented. Most centers are much more gifted in being tall then their natural ability.

Sorry those are random thoughts and I don't care to spend forever organizing them and wording them perfectly.

I do agree that building around a huge center is hard. The bigger they are the harder they fall (and get injured). It when you get the 7'0'' guy that has tons of natural ability that you have someone to build around. I think Howard is the 7 footer you could build around.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#3 » by john2jer » Fri Feb 6, 2009 5:33 pm

Isn't Howard like 6'9" barefoot? I think that's what he measured at the combine, he might have grown a little since then, though.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
Chance1117
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,252
And1: 23
Joined: Jul 24, 2003

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#4 » by Chance1117 » Fri Feb 6, 2009 5:35 pm

john2jer wrote:Isn't Howard like 6'9" barefoot? I think that's what he measured at the combine, he might have grown a little since then, though.


He is listed at 6'11'' but he has long arms and plays like 7 footer.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#5 » by revprodeji » Fri Feb 6, 2009 5:38 pm

his athletic ability lets him play the 5 but he is only 6'9-6'10. which is why he is not the defender many say he could be. but he is a good example. it is safer to have a 6'10 260 rather than a 7ft 300 from the injuries. bring a 7ft shotblocker off the bnch
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,895
And1: 85
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#6 » by PeeDee » Fri Feb 6, 2009 5:44 pm

I don't think 7ft 300 lbs is the key, I think having a very skilled big that can play de is. Let's look at the past 10 years of NBA finals particpants:


2007-08 Boston Celtics Los Angeles Lakers Notable Bigs: KG/Gasol
2006-07 San Antonio Spurs Cleveland Cavaliers Notable Bigs: Duncan
2005-06 Miami Heat Dallas Mavericks Notable Bigs: Shaq/Dirk
2004-05 San Antonio Spurs Detroit Pistons Notable Bigs: Duncan/Wallace
2003-04 Detroit Pistons Los Angeles Lakers Notable Bigs: Wallace/Shaq/Malone
2002-03 San Antonio Spurs New Jersey Nets Notable Bigs: Duncan/Martin
2001-02 Los Angeles Lakers New Jersey Nets Notable Bigs: Shaq/Martin
2000-01 Los Angeles Lakers Philadelphia 76ers Notable Bigs: Shaq
1999-00 Los Angeles Lakers Indiana Pacers Notable Bigs: Shaq/Smits
1998-99 San Antonio Spurs New York Knicks Notable Bigs: Duncan/Robinson

Every year (except maybe the Detroit year) the NBA Champions had an elite big on their roster. Of course the other key is that most had one or more elite wing. Most, however, won without a traditional elite PG which makes me question their real value.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#7 » by john2jer » Fri Feb 6, 2009 5:48 pm

PeeDee wrote:I don't think 7ft 300 lbs is the key, I think having a very skilled big that can play de is. Let's look at the past 10 years of NBA finals particpants:


2007-08 Boston Celtics Los Angeles Lakers Notable Bigs: KG/Gasol
2006-07 San Antonio Spurs Cleveland Cavaliers Notable Bigs: Duncan
2005-06 Miami Heat Dallas Mavericks Notable Bigs: Shaq/Dirk
2004-05 San Antonio Spurs Detroit Pistons Notable Bigs: Duncan/Wallace
2003-04 Detroit Pistons Los Angeles Lakers Notable Bigs: Wallace/Shaq/Malone
2002-03 San Antonio Spurs New Jersey Nets Notable Bigs: Duncan/Martin
2001-02 Los Angeles Lakers New Jersey Nets Notable Bigs: Shaq/Martin
2000-01 Los Angeles Lakers Philadelphia 76ers Notable Bigs: Shaq
1999-00 Los Angeles Lakers Indiana Pacers Notable Bigs: Shaq/Smits
1998-99 San Antonio Spurs New York Knicks Notable Bigs: Duncan/Robinson

Every year (except maybe the Detroit year) the NBA Champions had an elite big on their roster. Of course the other key is that most had one or more elite wing. Most, however, won without a traditional elite PG which makes me question their real value.


What I see looking at that list is two common themes...

Shaq and Duncan

End of story.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,895
And1: 85
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#8 » by PeeDee » Fri Feb 6, 2009 5:51 pm

How about Wade, Kobe, Parker, Ginobili, Peirce? All the bigs needed an elite wing counter-part to succeed. The lack of an elite, traditional PG is the thing that really stands out to me.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#9 » by john2jer » Fri Feb 6, 2009 6:00 pm

Oh definitely on the elite PG, who was the last top elite point guard to win a championship? Tony Parker and Chauncey Billups are the best out of that lsit, but I think you have to go all the way back to Mr. Sexual Harrassment himself, Isiah Thomas to find an elite point guard that won. Unless I forgot about someone.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,536
And1: 1,989
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#10 » by chrbal » Fri Feb 6, 2009 6:02 pm

PeeDee wrote:How about Wade, Kobe, Parker, Ginobili, Peirce? All the bigs needed an elite wing counter-part to succeed. The lack of an elite, traditional PG is the thing that really stands out to me.


Really? In a thread about big men, that is focusing on the really big...you can't get past wings.
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,895
And1: 85
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#11 » by PeeDee » Fri Feb 6, 2009 6:08 pm

chrbal wrote:Really? In a thread about big men, that is focusing on the really big...you can't get past wings.


My point, in case you missed it, is that having a 7ft 300lb monster isn't condusive to winning... having an elite big, paired with one or more elite wing is.

So no, I wouldn't advocate taking the plunge on any old 7 footer just because he's tall and big. Most of them turn out to be overpaid liabilities.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,017
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#12 » by Devilzsidewalk » Fri Feb 6, 2009 6:41 pm

in this day and age you definitely need a guard that can create offensive from scratch in the last 2 minutes of close games, but I think you need that bigman to get you to the point where you even have a chance to win in the last 2 minutes.

But you definitely need somebody who can create off the dribble for those 1 possession situations. Remember when we had Dwayne Casey - his "win the game" play was always to give KG the ball 30 feet from the hoop, and of course KG would get like 5 feet before 2 guys were able to surround him and force him to fire up a no hope prayer. Need a ball handler that can blow by defenders or split double teams, maybe get fouled or at the very worst get a half decent mid-range shot up. Most big men don't have the handles for that, nor are they comfortable shooting off the dribble.

Pistons are kind of the anomoly in all that in 04, but they were so chippy and surly, and had probably the best post defender and help defender in years, plus Prince was in shutdown any perimeter player mode and Chauncey was hitting clutch daggers, but that recipe didn't hold up for long.
Image
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#13 » by 4ho5ive » Fri Feb 6, 2009 6:55 pm

Aside from Shaq, what 7'0/300lb monster has accomplished anything worthwhile. Ewing, Robinson, The Dream, KAB, Walton, Duncan, none of these guys were 300+. Super athletic, strong, defensive bigs get it done. There arent alot out there in this caliber though.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#14 » by revprodeji » Fri Feb 6, 2009 7:32 pm

I think this showsthat love/al would work. but we need another playmaker at the 3 or 1. foye is a keeper but he needs help.

duncan is likely 6'10. perhaps having our own 6'10 low post guy could work. we just need to teach him defense.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,322
And1: 12,176
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#15 » by Worm Guts » Fri Feb 6, 2009 7:41 pm

revprodeji wrote:I think this showsthat love/al would work. but we need another playmaker at the 3 or 1. foye is a keeper but he needs help.


How? I think people have been worried about interior defense, not 7 feet 300 lbs. Size would be nice, but it's not essential. I think the bigger key is athleticism and the ability play defense are the bigger keys to what we're looking for in a 3rd big.


revprodeji wrote:duncan is likely 6'10. perhaps having our own 6'10 low post guy could work. we just need to teach him defense.


According to draftexpress measurement history, Duncan is 6'11.5 without shoes.
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#16 » by AQuintus » Fri Feb 6, 2009 7:47 pm

revprodeji wrote:I think this showsthat love/al would work. but we need another playmaker at the 3 or 1. foye is a keeper but he needs help.


I think that 7'1" 300 lb Andrew Bynum showed that Love/Al might work, but doesn't right now. Neither of them is big enough, athletic enough, or strong enough to effectively guard a 7ft 300lb monster.
Image
User avatar
Zeitgeister
General Manager
Posts: 8,705
And1: 7,336
Joined: Nov 11, 2008
   

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#17 » by Zeitgeister » Fri Feb 6, 2009 11:23 pm

One consistent quality you will see in championship teams is great post defense. Its not just about having a great shotblocker, or having a guy that's 7' 300 lbs, its about having 1 or more guys that can absolutely lock down the paint. They don't have to be 7 feet tall and big, but the thing is those players are typically very good at post defense, that's not a coincidence. They typically have great length and wide bodies, so its difficult to get easy shots around them.

So its not just about the height of Al and Love that's concerning, but specifically their length, lack of athleticism, and defensive instincts. If Love or Al had the strength, athleticism and defensive instincts of a Ben Wallace, i'd be fine with that but they don't.
Lenin wrote: All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,739
And1: 2,566
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#18 » by younggunsmn » Fri Feb 6, 2009 11:59 pm

Al is 6'9.5 w/shoes, 9'1 reach
Love is 6'9 with shoes, 8'11 reach.


Length is important. You can have perfect defensive fundamentals and be in the right place, but guys are still going to be able to score over and around you when you have the length and poor lateral agility of these 2 guys. And keeping 5 players in the right place all the time is alot harder than it looks.

Length is a "mistake eraser" for players. It allows you to alter a shot once someone has penetrated too far. KG just enveloped guys on the low post with his freakish reach. So many good opportunities died, even when guys had the ball in good position to score, because of his length. I haven't seen that from any of our players since he left.

Ben Wallace can overcompensate for lack of height because of his long arms.

Love has good strength and instincts, but poor agility and length. It's why he's a great, opportunistic offensive rebounder, but at times a poor defensive rebounder because the ball is easily tipped out from him because of his poor reach. His strength and instincts can make him a good post-up defender because he can push his man out, but he becomes a poor team defender because he has little ability to stop players who drive into the paint.

I actually think Al would be a decent weak-side shotblocker if he were playing PF next to a big defensive center.

Bynum absolutely destroyed us on both ends of the court. Al was 5/15 through 3 qtrs vs. bynum. He has a huge impact on the game, especially on the defensive end. He's a little knock-kneed and will have issues because of it, but his latest injury was just a freak thing where kobe crashed into him, it could've happened to anyone. The patella dislocation last year was more disturbing.

bynum and howard are like guys who hit 50 home runs in baseball or run a 4.2 forty, their particular game-changing skill sets are extremely rare.

We are going to keep giving up 110 points until we find someone who has the length, strength, and agility to be a presence down low. When you have 3 cornerstone guys who are and will probably always be defensive liablities because of length (love), height (foye) and physicality/desire (jefferson), you need to be able to overcompensate with above-average length and athletic ability at the other positions. We have ONE guy who can do that (Brewer). We need a rotational PG and C who can do it too.
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#19 » by AQuintus » Sat Feb 7, 2009 12:38 am

Jrue Holiday (PG w/ 6'8" Wingspan) and Thabeet (C w/ 7'9" wingspan) are two guys that fit that description.
Image
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: is the 7ft 300lbs monster overrated? 

Post#20 » by revprodeji » Sat Feb 7, 2009 12:47 am

I really miss brewer.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves