Erik Eleven wrote:Good luck to you, Vlad. Classless thread.
I'd say the way Radmanovic loafed around in our uniform for nearly three seasons despite getting paid damn good money was pretty classless, too.
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Erik Eleven wrote:Good luck to you, Vlad. Classless thread.
Sedale Threatt wrote:Erik Eleven wrote:Good luck to you, Vlad. Classless thread.
I'd say the way Radmanovic loafed around in our uniform for nearly three seasons despite getting paid damn good money was pretty classless, too.
Sedale Threatt wrote:Erik Eleven wrote:Good luck to you, Vlad. Classless thread.
I'd say the way Radmanovic loafed around in our uniform for nearly three seasons despite getting paid damn good money was pretty classless, too.
snaquille oatmeal wrote:conspiracy alert- remember when Phil pull him out of the starting lineup for no reason and said that it was for internal reasons and was not going to talk about it.
was it because Mitch told Phil to get used to not playing Vlad because he was shopping him or did Vlad do something to tick Phil off?
Erik Eleven wrote:Sedale Threatt wrote:Erik Eleven wrote:Good luck to you, Vlad. Classless thread.
I'd say the way Radmanovic loafed around in our uniform for nearly three seasons despite getting paid damn good money was pretty classless, too.
I agree.
But why must we regress to the times of tar and feathers, too?
semi-sentient wrote:No, it was because Radmanovic showed up late to practice, and it wasn't the first time (which is inexcusable, of course). He was on a short leash to begin with and the reality of the situation is that he was our most movable "bad" contract.
He wasn't benched for anything he did on the court, despite all the nonsense posted in various threads. I can't believe the level of hate and dishonesty around here, particularly when you consider how much of a pass Vujacic and Walton have gotten for being considerably worse on offense and not much better on defense (and I could easily argue that both have been worse in that regard).
Sedale Threatt wrote:I never, ever got that impression from Vlade. He was aloof, he was lazy, he was indifferent. Basically, he was a taller, whiter version of Smush Parker. His crappy attitude won't be missed, and that's what it all comes down to for me.
Sedale Threatt wrote:I'd say the way Radmanovic loafed around in our uniform for nearly three seasons despite getting paid damn good money was pretty classless, too.
Sedale Threatt wrote:Props for taking the high road. But it has nothing to do with regression, in my opinion.
I'm not going to pat somebody on the back just because they play for my favorite team. If he couldn't bother himself to work hard for three or four nights a week, why should I bother myself to wish him well on his way out the door?
Sedale Threatt wrote: Not that I wish him ill will or anything. I simply feel that respect and loyalty should be earned, not given. Vlade didn't do that. As such, I'm damn glad he'll no longer be wearing a Laker uniform, and I don't see any reason to keep that opinion to myself.
semi-sentient wrote:That's about the only level-headed reasoning I've heard regarding Radman, and I would agree. After he was taken out of the starting lineup his body language definitely changed out on the court with his decreased minutes. That's on him due to the fact that he pissed Phil off with his off-court antics so I certainly don't feel bad for him in that respect.
Others, however, are just flat out lying when criticizing the guy. One has to wonder if people really watched the Finals last year when you consider how much blame Radmanovic has been given. People are forgetting how poor of a job Walton and Vujacic did (and let's not forget Kobe giving Pierce those back-breaking wide open 3's after the wheelchair incident). I wish I had the thread handy, but I broke down where our problems where in the Finals, and they were all revolving around the poor play of our reserves (Walton and Turiaf in particular) which Radman was not.
Additionally, for some to say that he was useless is being completely dishonest. On offense, his only job was to space the floor -- and he was the ONLY guy outside of Fisher who effectively did that by being one of the top 3-point shooters in the league. Yet his play-making has come into question? Even on the defensive end he was doing an above average job until his eye injury (recall how much he was praised for buying into the new defensive scheme early in the season, and actually executing it). I just don't see the justification for the bulk of the criticism towards him. Sure, his defense fell off considerably when he came in for those short 1-2 minute stretches, but when he was given minutes he wasn't all that bad -- at least not any worse than Walton/Vujacic.
Erik Eleven wrote:Because it's the right thing to do? Regressive behavior, indeed, in my opinion. What exactly do we gain from a unibrowed shunning of him after the fact? To me, this is weak sauce, and about as interesting to participate in as tarring. People can write whatever they want about him. I'm not saying this as a mod.
I don't think he earned much respect or loyalty either. And I'm also really happy to know that he's not a Laker anymore. I can understand our personal need for redemption, but I can't see the point with revenge, at least very rarely. The guy is not going to be here anymore. Let's move on.