ImageImage

1/12/2009 Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added)

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

Are you in favor of the proposed trade (Conley for Sessions/JA)?

YES
127
49%
NO
133
51%
 
Total votes: 260

User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,602
And1: 42,724
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1681 » by ReasonablySober » Sun Feb 8, 2009 11:20 pm

Who's downplaying the game?
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,317
And1: 15,129
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1682 » by Ayt » Sun Feb 8, 2009 11:24 pm

DrugBust wrote:Who's downplaying the game?


I'm not going to name specific people. Read the post-game thread.

Though I guess it is very understandable for the reaction to be so subdued since he's an RFA and we have no room currently to sign him.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,602
And1: 42,724
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1683 » by ReasonablySober » Sun Feb 8, 2009 11:33 pm

Why not name specific people. You obviously have someone in mind. I read the game thread and I didn't see anyone down on what he did.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,784
And1: 6,993
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1684 » by LUKE23 » Sun Feb 8, 2009 11:36 pm

I still do it, unless somebody wants to guarantee me we're bringing Sessions back. All the people talking crap now, we'll see what your tune is when we let Sessions go this offseason and then could have had Conley and a 2010 first for Alexander. My guess is the tune will be different.
aboveAverage
RealGM
Posts: 10,993
And1: 2,913
Joined: Mar 25, 2006
 

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1685 » by aboveAverage » Mon Feb 9, 2009 12:10 am

Just because we might not be able to resign Sessions does not negate his amazing game. I understand that you are looking towards the future, but that doesn't mean that everything Sessions does this season is worthless.

By the way, I feel confident that Hammond will not let Sessions walk. He will do everything in his power to move RJ, even if it means dumping him for garbage. Hammond is not an idiot. He sees everything we see in Sessions.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1686 » by europa » Mon Feb 9, 2009 12:19 am

Ayt wrote:Though I guess it is very understandable for the reaction to be so subdued since he's an RFA and we have no room currently to sign him.


I disagree. The Bucks currently have $64.4M allotted in salary for next season. Even if no moves are made by the deadline, you could make a strong argument the Bucks have enough money to keep Sessions. I don't think he's going to get a deal worth in excess of $6M per year.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,329
And1: 27,986
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1687 » by trwi7 » Mon Feb 9, 2009 12:24 am

europa wrote:
Ayt wrote:Though I guess it is very understandable for the reaction to be so subdued since he's an RFA and we have no room currently to sign him.


I disagree. The Bucks currently have $64.4M allotted in salary for next season. Even if no moves are made by the deadline, you could make a strong argument the Bucks have enough money to keep Sessions. I don't think he's going to get a deal worth in excess of $6M per year.


You also have to add in the cost of our draft choices (about $3 million) and if he keeps playing well, I would expect him to get at least $6 million and one of the teams interested in him has cap space to offer him a deal (Memphis.)
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Mike X
Starter
Posts: 2,352
And1: 13
Joined: May 04, 2005
Location: Readin your posts and you dont even know it

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1688 » by Mike X » Mon Feb 9, 2009 12:24 am

aboveAverage wrote:Just because we might not be able to resign Sessions does not negate his amazing game. I understand that you are looking towards the future, but that doesn't mean that everything Sessions does this season is worthless.

By the way, I feel confident that Hammond will not let Sessions walk. He will do everything in his power to move RJ, even if it means dumping him for garbage. Hammond is not an idiot. He sees everything we see in Sessions.


Another monster game by Ramon and/or CV almost forces him to trade RJ for an expiring doesnt it. Failing to do so and losing both in the off-season for nothing because we cant afford them would surely have people around the NBA questioning his abilities.
aboveAverage
RealGM
Posts: 10,993
And1: 2,913
Joined: Mar 25, 2006
 

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1689 » by aboveAverage » Mon Feb 9, 2009 12:26 am

I hope Ramon follows this up with two or three more great games. That will force Hammond to finally get rid of that bum RJ.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1690 » by europa » Mon Feb 9, 2009 12:28 am

trwi7 wrote:
europa wrote:
Ayt wrote:Though I guess it is very understandable for the reaction to be so subdued since he's an RFA and we have no room currently to sign him.


I disagree. The Bucks currently have $64.4M allotted in salary for next season. Even if no moves are made by the deadline, you could make a strong argument the Bucks have enough money to keep Sessions. I don't think he's going to get a deal worth in excess of $6M per year.


You also have to add in the cost of our draft choices (about $3 million) and if he keeps playing well, I would expect him to get at least $6 million and one of the teams interested in him has cap space to offer him a deal (Memphis.)


True but that team also has a young PG of their own as we all know. Conley's playing his best ball of the season at the moment. If he finishes the season on a positive note, the Grizzlies may no longer be interested in Sessions.

As far as the draft picks, I could see Hammond looking to deal the first-round pick next year. He tried to trade his lottery pick last summer so I think it's very possible he'll try and trade next summer's pick as well.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1691 » by europa » Mon Feb 9, 2009 12:30 am

aboveAverage wrote:I hope Ramon follows this up with two or three more great games. That will force Hammond to finally get rid of that bum RJ.


Given the number of published reports we've seen about RJ being available, I think it's quite clear that trading RJ has become a priority for Hammond. And that was before Sessions' huge game last night.
Nothing will not break me.
MilBucksBackOnTop06
Banned User
Posts: 12,827
And1: 14
Joined: Nov 10, 2005

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1692 » by MilBucksBackOnTop06 » Mon Feb 9, 2009 7:10 am

DrugBust wrote:Who's downplaying the game?
Me!

I am! It was a fluke game! The Pistons came in here and underestimated the Bucks and Sessions. You fans are naive. I guarantee you he won't do that again to another team.

Sometimes a player has a bust out "he surprised us' game on a team that just did not come to play for whatever reason. Heavy legs, or weak minded, the Pistons looked out of sync until late when the game was on the line.

Teams who scout the Bucks properly from now on will take what Sessions did away. The Pistons Rodney Stuckey was stuck in the mud all night and Sessions is not even quick!

But he got to the line 23 times which is unheard of against past Pistons teams with Billups.

Iverson and Stuckey did a deplorable job on the ball defensively and no one helped them when Stuckey got by them which to me tells me there is dissension on that team...

Never do the Pistons in the past allow a layup line like that from the soft Bucks. Never...that is totally out of character.

I take nothing away from Sessions his motivation to play well and put up big numbers is quite evident. But I downplay this game which showed me absolutely NOTHING!

It would have showed me something ....if we had won the darn game! No moral victories here...
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,830
And1: 30,091
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1693 » by paulpressey25 » Wed May 8, 2013 7:39 pm

Bump for off-season nostalgia.

Mike Conley, Jr played pretty well last night.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
Nebula1
RealGM
Posts: 27,829
And1: 1,571
Joined: Aug 06, 2005
Location: Underground King
 

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll added) 

Post#1694 » by Nebula1 » Wed May 8, 2013 7:44 pm

Nebula1 wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:
Trading Ramon is a bad idea.


Not for Conley it's not. No chance. But you said we would be "selling the farm" if we traded him in a deal for Amare, so that is all I need to know about your opinion of Sessions.


Someone has to stick up for this kid.

And yes, it's a bad idea. I wouldn't include him in the deal for Amare. It could be done other ways. He's the right PG for that team.

Conley may turn out to be a nice player, but it's a lateral move at best right now.




I was very defensive of Ramon and completely blinded by those times. I probably wouldn't have traded Sessions for anybody in the League. :)

Luke had this deal down perfect.
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 29,392
And1: 17,249
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: 1/12/2009 Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll ad 

Post#1695 » by JayMKE » Wed May 8, 2013 8:18 pm

Mike Conley or Al Horford would be a Buck right now if Stern didn't rig that draft to punish the "tankers"
FREE GIANNIS
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,742
And1: 1,315
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

Re: 1/12/2009 Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll ad 

Post#1696 » by Thunder Muscle » Wed May 8, 2013 8:21 pm

Conley is a good example of a guy that was a bit of a late bloomer. If I recall correctly he had a few rough years where it looked like he'd be out of the league in no time, probably why this trade was even on the table. Some guys just need time. Larry Sanders appears to be another good example.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: 1/12: Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb approval 

Post#1697 » by europa » Wed May 8, 2013 8:23 pm

europa wrote:Conley's upside is huge and I think it's a gamble worth taking.


:(
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,602
And1: 42,724
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 1/12/2009 Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll ad 

Post#1698 » by ReasonablySober » Wed May 8, 2013 8:24 pm

Just looked up his numbers. I had no idea Conley turned in the year he did. Wow.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,742
And1: 1,315
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

Re: 1/12/2009 Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll ad 

Post#1699 » by Thunder Muscle » Wed May 8, 2013 8:27 pm

Yeah, statistically just a solid steady point guard. Sure would be nice... *sigh*

I wonder what held ol Herbie up. See Joe Dunk?
User avatar
jr lucosa
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,048
And1: 1,151
Joined: Jul 11, 2008
       

Re: 1/12/2009 Woelfel: Conley deal waiting for Herb (poll ad 

Post#1700 » by jr lucosa » Wed May 8, 2013 9:07 pm

I don't remember my exact stance on this topic nor do I have the energy to dig through all these pages, I apparently voted no though. If I remember correctly I already thought Joe was trash but was very high on Sessions and thought he was the better PG of the two, oops.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks