Walt Cronkite wrote:I didn't say it's unfair, I said that it's stupid.
DJ's original role was to provide a spark off of the bench. When he starts, it's to provide ball handling, create shots for others but mostly still to provide efficient scoring out of the backcourt.
Felton's role (since his first day on the team) is to be the floor general.
My main point is that I think pgs that aren't a threat to score (or worse-- that are chuckers) but can pass are just as flawed as DJ Augustin type guards. Posters used to RIP on BK because he couldn't shoot and everyone knew he wanted to pass the ball. He racked up assists, but the argument went that Felton gave us a better chance to win because he could pass AND score. Years later, Felton can only do one of those things at an efficient rate, but he gets a pass because he "looks more like a pg". I just don't get what that means.
On the other end, we have a rookie pg that has completed half of a season and is 4th amongst rookies in assists but since he can actually shoot he gets knocked for "looking more like a sg". It's madness.
I don't think it's because he can shoot. Steve Nash is a hell of a shooter and I wouldn't say he looks more like a sg then a pg. When Augustin drives to the basket he looks to score first annd I don't think he runs pick and rolls or pops as well. Like I said, I love what DJ brings to the table and I would not label him a shooting guard, but he is a pure pg only by size.
And when I say Felton looks more like a pg, I mean the offense seems to run better with him at the point then with DJ at the point.