Cast a vote, and nominate a player please.
Only judges that have asked to be on the panel can vote, and only their vote will be counted, if you were in the previous panel about 2 yrs ago, you are welcome to vote, and if you would like to be apart of the panel just simply post in the stickied RealGM all time 100 list.
This is based on the players career, rather than peak, just to be clear.
George McGinnis was the last player chosen, here is the newest addition to the list:
Kevin Johnson

3xAll-Star
4x2nd team All-NBA
1x3rd team All-NBA
"Pistol" Pete Maravich

5x All-Star
2x1st, 2x2nd All-NBA team
Led NBA in scoring in 1977
Voted into HOF in 1987
Anfernee "Penny" Hardaway

4-time All-Star
3-time All-NBA Selection
1994 All-Rookie First Team
1 time top 10 MVP voting, 1 time top 5
Dave Bing
7x All-Star
2 1st team All-NBA
1 2nd team All-NBA
2 top 5 MVP finishes
HOF 1990
Connie Hawkins

6x All-Star (4NBA, 1 ABA, 1ABL)
1x All-NBA 1st, 2 All-ABA 1st, 1 All-ABL 1st
1968 ABA MVP
1968 ABA Playoff MVP
1962 ABL MVP
1962 ABL Playoff MVP
Basketball Hall of Fame 1992
Paul Pierce

6x All-Star
3x 3rd team All-NBA
2008 Finals MVP
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
VOTING:
Bing, Penny, Pete, and KJ were all flashy, explosive scoring PGs; Bing had the longest career, KJ was the truest point, Penny (with Shaq) went the furthest as a primary player (Maravich got a ring with Boston as a role player), of the four I rate Bing the best for his full career accomplishments.
Pierce and Hawkins are better picks than any of the guards though. Pierce has as long a career as Bing and adds a finals MVP. Hawkins had the unique hard-luck story (possibly the greatest talent loss to the leauge outside possibly Walton or Sabonis) and still managed 2 MVPs in the 1st year ABL and ABAs before tearing up his knee and limping through the rest of his career as a jump shooting wing rather than the explosive skywalking big he was before.
Vote: Connie Hawkins
NOMINATION:
At this point I consider Jack Sikma or Walt Bellamy for big men, maybe Dan Issel too. Forwards I can see Larry Nance or Buck Williams not really feeling Mark Aquirre or Spencer Haywood despite the stats. For guards, I am looking at Kevin Johnson (Mark Price/Tim Hardaway) and Ray Allen (Reggie Miller/Vince Carter); Walter Davis isn't up to Ray Allen's level and I'm not a big Maravich fan. Cutting it down, Sikma stands out over Williams for his titles, Bells is the stat monster, Ray Allen was about the same level as KJ (consistently top 5, usually top 3 at his position but never #1) without the injury issues and with the championship last year. I have Ray a hair better than Reggie Miller too. However, the best two way player is Nance, not just the best defender of the bunch (help defense gives him the edge over Sikma) but also the most efficient offensive player at a career 20ppg. The most underrated top player in NBA history, he quietly put up great numbers for a long time.
I added Shawn Kemp and Spencer Haywood to the list too. they are both worthy of top 100 consideration but . . . Kemp was basically inferior to Jack Sikma in every way. He scored less, with less variety, he rebounded less, he was a lesser defender, a lesser passer, didn't win any rings, and unlike Sikma who was a class act through his career, ended on a bad note. . . Haywood was another spectacular player from the ABA, though he only had one year there. He then played on bad teams in Seattle running up 25-30ppg seasons through his peak, and was probably the most talented of the remaining players. He also had some personal issues, but unlike Kemp came back and was a valuable contributor to some top teams late in his career. All three were possible top 100 players, but Sikma and Haywood should both go before Shawn Kemp.
Big Men:
Player (14 years) G MP FG% FTA FT% REB AST BLK PTS
1 Walt Bellamy 1043 37.3 .516 7.8 .632 13.7 2.4 0.6* 20.1 *Blocks not kept for most of career
2 Larry Nance 920* 33.4 .546 4.2 .755 8.0 2.6 2.2 17.1 *only played 13 years
3 Dan Issel * 1141 35.1 .501 7.0 .792 9.5 2.4 0.6 23.2 21.6 *Includes 6 years in ABA
4 Buck Williams 1122 34.4 .552 4.9 .664 10.7 1.4 0.9 13.9
5 Jack Sikma 1107 33.4 .464 4.6 .849 9.8 3.2 0.9 15.6
6. Shawn Kemp 1051 27.9 .488 5.5 .741 8.4 1.6 1.2 14.6
7. Spencer Haywood 844 34.8 .469 5.3 .796 10.3 1.8 1.1 20.3 *only played 13 years
Guards:
Player (12 years) G MP FG% 3PA 3p% FTA FT% REB AST PTS
1 Ray Allen 860 37.3 .446 6.1 .397 4.4 .889 4.5 3.9 21.1
2 Reggie Miller 847 34.4 .482 4.5 .403 5.7 .879 3.1 3.1 19.7 *1st 12 years out of 18 good ones!
3 Chris Mullin 787 35.4 .514 2.0 .366 4.9 .862 4.5 4.0 20.5
4 Tony Parker 581* 33.2 .488 1.7 .316 3.9 .722 3.1 5.5 16.3 *only 8 years so far, age 26!
5 Chauncey Billups 805 31.9 .416 4.4 .386 4.7 .887 2.9 5.5 15.0
Looking at the numbers, of the bigs, Bellamy and Issel were the offensive stars. Both had inflated numbers, Bellamy by the expansion years and Issel both by his ABA numbers and the pace of his Denver teams. Unfortunately I remember too many debates about how Issel and Bellamy's weaknesses (particularly defenisvely) were the reason their teams couldn't get to the finals.
Williams, Sikma and Nance all had great defensive reps; Bells and Issel average to poor defense. Nance is the only real shotblocker; he is also the weakest rebounder though he played a lot of 3 earlier in his career while all the others spent their career as big men. I was thinking Bellamy or Sikma going in but Nance really looks impressive when you consider his defensive impact and Nance holds up very well offensively with his lower scoring compensated by his higher efficiency. (I always thought he was better both ways than James Worthy who is in).
Of the wings, Mullin had the most versatile game but was the weakest defender and didn't shoot the three pointer as much. Reggie was the most efficient but was basically one dimensional. Allen is the best three point shooter of the three and the one who can create his shot; plus he has a ring now. Neither of the PGs is quite at that level to me. Parker is in as a comp for Billups; they are roughly equal in value offensively but Billups has defense while Parker has 3 rings and is still in the prime of his career and might add value.
Nance v. Allen . . . Allen is the 3 point threat with one ring. Nance is the shotblocker. Nance is nearly as impressive offensively as Allen, far greater defensively, and was truly spectacular to watch . . . remember he is the one that won the first NBA Slam Dunk competition over the likes of Nique and Dr. J.
NOMINATION: "The Thin Man" LARRY NANCE (Jack Sikma if the nomination is close and Nance isn't)