Gme 56: Charlotte (22-34) @ Phoenix (31-24)

Itmotep · Post #1 » by **Itmotep** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:58 am

First time trying this, see how it goes!
.
.
.

VERSUS

GO SUNS!

Itmotep · Post #2 » by **Itmotep** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:01 am

Ok, looks like next time just make the boxes just a little less long so Shaq can fit in the same line as the starters :oops:

Never Fear 33 Is Here · Post #3 » by **Never Fear 33 Is Here** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:23 am

Hopefully we cream them and get a little something back for the game that the DP09 group was at.

suns12345 · Post #4 » by **suns12345** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:34 am

lol are u saying the refs are the 5th starter

suns12345 · Post #5 » by **suns12345** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:34 am

lol are u saying the refs are the 5th starter

pidi · Post #6 » by **pidi** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:44 am

ha, nice one - especially with the refs...

Frank Lee · Post #7 » by **Frank Lee** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:07 pm

I wonder which Bobcat will have his career high ???

Frank Lee · Post #8 » by **Frank Lee** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:08 pm

Double post...... but I will wager it will be Felton

Stix · Post #9 » by **Stix** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:40 pm

With Our Luck... Bell gets 18 pts 9 assts. Diaw gets 30+ and 10+ boards. :-?

TXSun · Post #10 » by **TXSun** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:01 pm

must win against this team. we can't afford to lose to sub .500 ball clubs.

realsunsfan · Post #11 » by **realsunsfan** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:27 pm

TXSun wrote:must win against this team. we can't afford to lose to sub .500 ball clubs.

Guys, just like we can't judge our teams second half of the season success by the first three games we looked pretty good, we can't judge them by the first bad looking loss either. I think we played pretty well during some parts of the game, i will agree the refs had a big hand in taking us out of the game with some of those horrible calls, but we as a team need to be able to overcome that. I think the guys put too much into the thought that they were playing the defending champs and played a little nervous and let the little things get to them too much. Yeah, we lost pretty bad, but keep in mind that we are having to adjust to Amare being gone, and we will have to adjust even more when we pick someone up off waivers and incorporate them into our play. We really won't know how we really are going to fair against the better teams for at least a couple weeks once the dust settles again. Our style of play will get us past the sub par teams for now, but depending on who we pick up, and how quickly they can adapt to our style will determine how we end up. I honestly think we will be ok, I think it's going to be difficult to say the least, but I do believe we can do it.

Post #12 » by **TASTIC** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:54 pm

Will be a tough game..I think we match up better with Amare out as Barnes will defend Diaw better anyway.
JRich will hopefully torch them...GWallace for 25 and 15 I think, Okafor 15rebs too

PHX 114
CHA 105

realsunsfan · Post #13 » by **realsunsfan** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:22 pm

TASTIC wrote:Will be a tough game..I think we match up better with Amare out as Barnes will defend Diaw better anyway.
JRich will hopefully torch them...GWallace for 25 and 15 I think, Okafor 15rebs too

PHX 114
CHA 105

After watching Simms in garbage time, watching his body language, I think we should give him some more playing time and see how he does, I think he can be a decent player.....

Post #14 » by **rsavaj** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:44 pm

Dear Boris,

Please don't destroy us.

Sincerely,

--Suns fans.

JohnVancouver · Post #15 » by **JohnVancouver** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:17 pm

Like someone said on another thread, right now we're the "best of the rest"
fatigue is going to be a factor - five games in seven nights? They'll have their legs back soon, I imagine. Hill's foot is a concern

JohnVancouver · Post #16 » by **JohnVancouver** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:42 pm

JohnVancouver wrote:Like someone said on another thread, right now we're the "best of the rest"
fatigue is going to be a factor - five games in seven nights? They'll have their legs back soon, I imagine. Hill's foot is a concern

edit: looks like there's no feed on the usual sites
buck.modernettes@gmail if you can help
thanks

Tastic - I reckon this is okay, rules-wise?

TXSun · Post #17 » by **TXSun** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:35 am

can't lose to this team. we must win vs all sub .500 and/or non-playoffs team and hope to win some against contenders to even have a chance. I thought HOU was gonna fall apart now that TMac is out, but they've won 4 straight. As far UTA, they've won 4 straingt and got Boozer back tonight.

JohnVancouver · Post #18 » by **JohnVancouver** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:50 am

Ok - game is tomorrow night.
Makes me feel a lot better about not being able to find it online.
Duh

JohnVancouver · Post #19 » by **JohnVancouver** » Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:48 pm

So apparently Sims 2nd contract has run out and we'd have to keep him for he rest of the season if we signed him again. Anyone heard anything about pickups we might make?

DaDragicShow · Post #20 » by **DaDragicShow** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:00 am

Go Phx. Every wins is important from here on out.