Icness wrote:I believe that worries a team just as much as it attracts them. Where does he fit best? How do I address the rest of my line needs? What if he is adequate at all but not a real asset at any, then I just burned a high draft pick on a utility lineman? If I were repping Unger, I would throw his versatility on the back burner and market him as a G, where he might be the best one or two in this class. No way he's more than a backup C, and I don't see the footwork/strength to play LT (not right away). Bag the "jack of all, master of none" and have him commit to G, but keep the seed planted that if he doesn't work out at G, he has the ability to try him at other spots with reasonable expectation of success.
Or maybe I've been talking to agents too much...
Sounds perfect for the Bears who need help at G, RT, and maybe even C.