ImageImageImage

Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
BillTheGOAT
Starter
Posts: 2,033
And1: 1,930
Joined: Oct 23, 2008
 

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#221 » by BillTheGOAT » Sun Mar 1, 2009 11:29 pm

lakers lost too,which makes tonight loss even worse.
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 16,992
And1: 10,687
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#222 » by return2glory » Mon Mar 2, 2009 12:26 am

Doc made some big mistakes in this game. Here is what Doc messed up on:

1. Doc played BBD the entire 2nd half. Are you serious. BBD played great again, but couldn't we find about 4-5 minutes rest for him. He isn't used to those minutes and he looked tired.
2. Doc played Pierce the entire game. He took Pierce out with 18 seconds to go in game. That's the only time he came out. Doc talks about giving Pierce and Ray some rest but then can't find a time to give Pierce a short rest.
3. Doc kept Rondo out to long. Rondo didn't come back in the 4th quarter until around the 3 minute mark. House was playing PG again in the 4th. That wasn't a good sign.
triplet1984
General Manager
Posts: 8,356
And1: 177
Joined: Jan 18, 2006

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#223 » by triplet1984 » Mon Mar 2, 2009 12:30 am

The Corey's wrote:apparently rip hamilton is a bitch, he wears a face mask for like five years he doesnt even need and has the nerve to complain about getting hit in the face?


Don't be an idiot. He has had multiple surgeries on his nose, without it, it just takes one strong hit to it and it can end his career or at the very least knock him out for a season. So he doesn't "need" it in the sense that he cant play without it, but absolutely should be waering in.

See: Amare Stoudamire.

He injured that eye like twice, and ignored doctor's advice to wear the Goggles. What happened? He got hit in the eye - out for a season.
User avatar
chakdaddy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,378
And1: 1,420
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#224 » by chakdaddy » Mon Mar 2, 2009 2:37 am

Da-Met wrote:
The Corey's wrote:apparently rip hamilton is a bitch, he wears a face mask for like five years he doesnt even need and has the nerve to complain about getting hit in the face?


Don't be an idiot. He has had multiple surgeries on his nose, without it, it just takes one strong hit to it and it can end his career or at the very least knock him out for a season. So he doesn't "need" it in the sense that he cant play without it, but absolutely should be waering in.

See: Amare Stoudamire.

He injured that eye like twice, and ignored doctor's advice to wear the Goggles. What happened? He got hit in the eye - out for a season.


A broken nose can't end a career or cause blindness. If he breaks his nose again, it heals again. He wears the mask because he feels more comfortable with it. There's no medical reason for it. A broken nose isn't like a detached retina or multiple concussions or something. That's absurd to think a broken nose could end a season or career.
User avatar
SuigintouEV
General Manager
Posts: 7,939
And1: 1,556
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Contact:
   

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#225 » by SuigintouEV » Mon Mar 2, 2009 2:46 am

Our "best player all year" only going 2-10 from the field? Playing atrocious defense on RIP Hamilton? Who would of thought? Thanks Ray.


Yeah you're totally right, Ray Allen can't be key if this team wants to go anywhere. Against a guy like RIP he got exposed, this is just sign of things to come in the playoffs and he will hold the Celtics back.


http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 20BOS.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 80BOS.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 00DET.html
Image
"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
User avatar
TMU
Forum Mod - Rockets
Forum Mod - Rockets
Posts: 30,188
And1: 10,413
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: O.R.
       

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#226 » by TMU » Mon Mar 2, 2009 4:44 am

Not one complaint about Big Baby's defense? The only reason he's in the line-up is because he can stretch the floor a bit better than Powe. Either way, Doc has no business of giving him 30+ minutes. Sure, he's developing a nice midrange game but he's still a porous defender and this weakness outweighs his strengths. For a team like the Celtics, I can't stress enough about the importance of having a big man off the bench, who can stretch the floor and not become a liability on the defensive end. This team needs Garnett more than ever.
User avatar
Avalanche
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,522
And1: 1,498
Joined: May 21, 2007
Location: Australia
Contact:
     

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#227 » by Avalanche » Mon Mar 2, 2009 4:48 am

Baby's D is actually pretty solid against the bigger, strong centres who play in the post... hes one of our best options against guys like shaq, howard, even duncan

agaisnt guys who spread the floor like sheed, dyess etc though hes just average
Image
Spud34
Banned User
Posts: 244
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 23, 2008
Location: Where Paul Pierce 2008 Finals MVP happens.

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#228 » by Spud34 » Mon Mar 2, 2009 6:03 am

SuigintouEV wrote:
Our "best player all year" only going 2-10 from the field? Playing atrocious defense on RIP Hamilton? Who would of thought? Thanks Ray.


Yeah you're totally right, Ray Allen can't be key if this team wants to go anywhere. Against a guy like RIP he got exposed, this is just sign of things to come in the playoffs and he will hold the Celtics back.


http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 20BOS.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 80BOS.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 00DET.html


You were probably being sarcastic, but I still agree. :D
DieselCeltic
Banned User
Posts: 668
And1: 0
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#229 » by DieselCeltic » Mon Mar 2, 2009 4:07 pm

Like I was saying few days ago and some people were flaming me, we will not repeat this year. You have a fine blue print of what I'm talking about yesterday...so that's that...

I'm not trying to be like Joethebiscuit and other negative force here but Cleveland is about to get Joe Smith, and they are playing just out of their mind.

We just don't have that I WANT IT type of mentality that we had last year.
Joebiscuit
Banned User
Posts: 3,814
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 18, 2005

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#230 » by Joebiscuit » Mon Mar 2, 2009 4:27 pm

I agree diesel. Cavs keep winning and winning. Yes they will lose a game once and while but they will not go though a stretch where they go 2-7 or lose to a couple of sub 500 teams in a 5 day period. Getting Smith puts them over the top. Celtics will easily lose by 15 on Friday. This game will not be pretty.
floyd
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,414
And1: 649
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#231 » by floyd » Mon Mar 2, 2009 5:13 pm

Spud34 wrote:
SuigintouEV wrote:
Our "best player all year" only going 2-10 from the field? Playing atrocious defense on RIP Hamilton? Who would of thought? Thanks Ray.


Yeah you're totally right, Ray Allen can't be key if this team wants to go anywhere. Against a guy like RIP he got exposed, this is just sign of things to come in the playoffs and he will hold the Celtics back.


http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 20BOS.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 80BOS.html
http://www.basketball-reference.com/box ... 00DET.html


You were probably being sarcastic, but I still agree. :D


Pierce kept us in the game early in the fourth, but we could've pulled it out without a few atrocious turnovers by him down the stretch. I love Pierce and i love Ray, but I don't love them handling the ball 5 feet beyond the 3 point line. Too many times it turns into easy buckets for the other team off some poor dribbling.

The fact that Ray had a poor game and we lost should tell you how important he is to this club, not that he's less important than Pierce. The margin for error shrinks when we're missing one of the big 3, especially when he's the guy who likes to chew up Rasheed Wallace.

The sky is not falling. KG will be back. The first round will be a tune up. We've got time to get it together. And the top seed is well within reach.
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#232 » by MyInsatiableOne » Mon Mar 2, 2009 9:08 pm

^^Good to see our resident "superfans" diesel and JoeBiscuit chiming in...way to pump up the team and the fans, guys! :roll:
It's still 17 to 11!!!!
User avatar
Pogue Mahone
Head Coach
Posts: 6,006
And1: 738
Joined: Aug 09, 2003
Location: In the Sun
Contact:
     

Re: Celtics vs Pistons - Sunday, March 1st - 1:00 

Post#233 » by Pogue Mahone » Wed Mar 4, 2009 2:14 pm

floyd wrote:The fact that Ray had a poor game and we lost should tell you how important he is to this club


Sorry for bringing up an older post but I just got around to reading the game thread from the other night.

I understand your point Floyd but consider it from a different angle. What constitutes a poor game? Porous defense? Poor shooting? Lots of turnovers?

What I think you are saying is that Ray Allen had a poor game scoring the ball from an efficiency standpoint. It happens, though. Every player will have an off night, at one point or another, regardless of how skilled they are. Part of that is the defense, of course, but injuries, fatigue, lack of synergy with teammates and just the grind of the season all play into to it, too.

Rondo, on the other hand, had a very good game on the defensive glass, did a fairly decent job getting teammates involved via the pass and did a good job of getting to the line and converting, per his attempts. As to his shooting, hey, shots don't always fall. What matters is that you contribute to the overall efficiency of your team, at both ends of the court. It doesn't matter how you do it.

The issue, one I have attempted to present in the past, is what does Ray Allen do if he is having an off night scoring? Does he re-focus his energy into getting quality shots for teammates, playing improved defense and/or hitting the glass?

We lost not because of an off-shooting night by Ray Allen but because are defense had its worst performance of the year (.08 points per possession worse than our previous worst performance.) Simply put, that is 23.89 points more than we should have given up. A couple of points about that:

1. The game was played at a very slow pace (~83.0 possessions.)
2. If we had played at our normal pace (~90.7 possessions), we would have likely given up ~118 points.

Offensively, despite Ray Allen and Rajon Rondo having off shooting nights, we still managed our 17th best offensive performance of the year. We were .035 points per possession better than our season average. Under our normal pace, we would have put up ~105 points.

This game was not as close as it appeared.

Someone pointed it out earlier but I think it bears repeating: Glen Davis, thanks for the offensive contribution but your defense, despite generally being in position, stinks. Now, that being said, our offense looked and performed at much better levels than if Glen Davis doesn't hit a lot of those shots. That doesn't exonerate him from poor defense, though. He wasn't communicating, he was slow on rotations and, when he was in position, they simply shot over the top of him.

Ray Allen exacerbated the situation by getting lit up by Rip Hamilton. It wasn't so much the shots as he came off picks as it was how easy he allowed Hamilton to get penetration and to break down our defense. And this follows a string of games in which he has been beaten by the dribble penetration of Fred Jones, Leandro Barbosa and JR Smith, amongst others. Which is fine because you can cover up for teammate with help defense. You can't cover up for two, however, especially when one of them is part of the back-line of defense. Doc needs to pick his poison in regards to playing Ray Allen extended minutes or sitting Ray when he plays Glen Davis, imo.

floyd wrote:not that he's less important than Pierce.


I would say that not only is Ray less important than Pierce he is far less important than Pierce. Pierce is able to contribute via defense, playmaking and scoring, amongst other subtle things. Ray really only brings the skill of shooting (which he is fantastic at) but the rest of his game is very empty. There are added benefits to Ray (ie> high possession/low turnover, some floor spacing, at times) but they are not strong enough to make up for his poor shooting nights, imo. He really needs to buckle down defensively and start to be more of a factor on the defensive glass when his shot isn't falling. Glen Davis falls into the same group, actually, especially considering his offense is far less reliable.

Rondo, Pierce and Perkins were really the only players on the defensive glass for the Celtics against the Pistons. Glen Davis and Ray Allen each chipped in two defensive rebounds in almost 72 minutes of play. A rebound every 18 minutes. Now, sure, the pace of the game and the offensive efficiency of Detroit played into that but, by DReb%, Ray was at his season average, Davis was far below (and a tick below his OReb%), Pierce was just about as his, Rondo was way up and Perkins was down. Perkins was also covering the more difficult of the Detroit bigs and was often taken away from the basket. Leon Powe was a non-factor on the defensive glass, as well.

floyd wrote:The margin for error shrinks when we're missing one of the big 3, especially when he's the guy who likes to chew up Rasheed Wallace.


I thought Perkins was doing a pretty good job in the post, at both ends, and I think it would bode well for the future if they continue to give him consistent touches. He is neither a superstar nor a total non-entity on the offensive end but he is a non-entity when not given touches. I would also like to see him take a few more jumpers (more like a set shot) from time to time, just to keep the defense honest.

Additionally, by making Perkins a regular offensive contributor, referees are less likely to call ticky-tack fouls on him.

floyd wrote:The sky is not falling. KG will be back. The first round will be a tune up. We've got time to get it together. And the top seed is well within reach.


I agree. I actually think we miss Brian Scalabrine more than most are willing to admit, as well. I also think that Ray Allen needs to start setting picks on offense. Not as part of the pick-and-roll but off the ball. I honestly think that he would get just as easy of looks as he does when he runs off picks and he would be able to conserve energy to play better defense. It would actually help the entire team because it would mitigate the chance of moving screen on our bigs. I never understood why you risk so many offensive fouls on backbone of your defense.

Return to Boston Celtics