Pacers Psychic Predictions: 3/3/09

Post #1 » by **Miller4ever** » Mon Mar 2, 2009 6:14 pm

Congrats to Dunthreevy for having faith in the Pacers.

Next, up, the Sacramento Kings, who we haven't played yet, and who suck worse than we do in many ways. Hopefully we'll be able to use the momentum from the last game to really dominate in an away game, because a road win is overdue and necessary.

Pacers by 5.

Granger da OG · Post #2 » by **Granger da OG** » Mon Mar 2, 2009 6:22 pm

What the heck, Pacers +25, yeah i said it +25

cdash · Post #3 » by **cdash** » Mon Mar 2, 2009 8:36 pm

Pacers by 4.

Kuq_e_Zi91 · Post #4 » by **Kuq_e_Zi91** » Mon Mar 2, 2009 8:39 pm

We played the Kings in January. Kevin Martin was only a couple games back from an injury and he still dropped 45 on us. Danny had 35 of his own and we came out with the win.

We really need this game. Hopefully we're still riding high after that win vs Denver.

Pacers +15

Post #5 » by **APerna** » Mon Mar 2, 2009 11:21 pm

Indy by +10

chatard5 · Post #6 » by **chatard5** » Mon Mar 2, 2009 11:51 pm

Wow, I didn't know the Kings were 13-48... But we are 7-25 on the road, which is bad, too. Pacers +3

chatard5 · Post #7 » by **chatard5** » Mon Mar 2, 2009 11:57 pm

M4E, in the Tracking Thread it still says a minimum of 10 games, but I think you wanted to change it to 20 or something. If I win I am definitely getting the song, and you better not rhyme chatard with (Please Use More Appropriate Word).

Post #8 » by **Miller4ever** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 12:01 am

It is 20. I'm even considering 25, but that's bad to change the rules that much. People are going to start getting disqualified because they don't have enough games.

khensley308 · Post #9 » by **khensley308** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 5:14 am

Pacers by 8

Dunthreevy · Post #10 » by **Dunthreevy** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 5:21 am

Pacers +8

RikSmits1 · Post #11 » by **RikSmits1** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 4:13 pm

Pacers +15

JarrettJackSG · Post #12 » by **JarrettJackSG** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 5:37 pm

It's a game we should win.

Kings by 4

Post #13 » by **Miller4ever** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 7:17 pm

Nice, JJSG. Glad to see you playing our petty little games again. You're just in time to continue just when I removed you from the standings because you hadn't posted here in a month...

How do you feel about starting over?

EDIT*: I just remembered that when I took you out, you were in the bottom half. Sstarting over's a good idea.

cdash · Post #14 » by **cdash** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 7:38 pm

You know, he's probably right. It's a game we should win, so we probably won't.

pacersrule08 · Post #15 » by **pacersrule08** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 9:42 pm

Pacers by 9

xxSnEaKyPxx · Post #16 » by **xxSnEaKyPxx** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 10:05 pm

Kings by 5...I was originally going to put 4, but JJSG took it. 0_0

Post #17 » by **Miller4ever** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 10:47 pm

I'ma repeat myself again: doesn't matter who came first, because it all averages out in the end, unless you continuously guess the exact same as somebody else (unlikely).

xxSnEaKyPxx · Post #18 » by **xxSnEaKyPxx** » Tue Mar 3, 2009 10:56 pm

Meh...I'll stick with 5 anyway.

bballpacen · Post #19 » by **bballpacen** » Wed Mar 4, 2009 12:44 am

Pacers +11

JarrettJackSG · Post #20 » by **JarrettJackSG** » Wed Mar 4, 2009 1:32 am

Miller4ever wrote:Nice, JJSG. Glad to see you playing our petty little games again. You're just in time to continue just when I removed you from the standings because you hadn't posted here in a month...

How do you feel about starting over?

EDIT*: I just remembered that when I took you out, you were in the bottom half. Sstarting over's a good idea.

haha i don't mind..i think a month's break was fair don't you? given all the tension we had? all is well now.