ImageImageImage

49-0

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

User avatar
Cyclical
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,766
And1: 3,397
Joined: Nov 13, 2005
     

49-0 

Post#1 » by Cyclical » Sat Mar 7, 2009 8:41 am

It's not a coincidence that Pierce mentioned taking care of the ball and not turning it over in the post game interview. The Celts had only 8 TO's in tonight's game. When they take care of the ball they're unbeatable.

Their record when turning the ball over less than 11 times per game? A perfect 49-0. That's simply amazing. It's been their biggest achilles' heel this season and the main reason they've squandered some leads. Impressive stuff tonight.


EDIT: 49, not 63
User avatar
AlCelticFan
General Manager
Posts: 9,445
And1: 6,504
Joined: Mar 09, 2005
Location: Massachusetts

Re: TO's 

Post#2 » by AlCelticFan » Sat Mar 7, 2009 9:38 am

63-0 is damn impressive. TO's are just such an important stat, every TO is giving away free points...
User avatar
Cyclical
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,766
And1: 3,397
Joined: Nov 13, 2005
     

Re: 63-0 

Post#3 » by Cyclical » Sat Mar 7, 2009 10:07 pm

BUMP (+title change)



I'm surprised no one commented on this... I think it's an incredible stat. We've had good play from individuals in the past but turnovers have killed us regardless. This is a huge key.
Rocky5000
Analyst
Posts: 3,386
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

Re: 63-0 

Post#4 » by Rocky5000 » Sat Mar 7, 2009 10:31 pm

Like I said when we first got Marbury, if his play can solve our TO problems, we'll be in very good shape.
LeBronxJames
Banned User
Posts: 91
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2009
Location: McDonald's Kitchen

Re: 63-0 

Post#5 » by LeBronxJames » Sat Mar 7, 2009 10:51 pm

MR.Allen very good player! I like like his shooting!
User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,785
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Location: The future

Re: 63-0 

Post#6 » by Dirty Water » Sat Mar 7, 2009 10:59 pm

LeBronxJames wrote:MR.Allen very good player! I like like his shooting!

Gotta love ballboys.
LeBronxJames
Banned User
Posts: 91
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 28, 2009
Location: McDonald's Kitchen

Re: 63-0 

Post#7 » by LeBronxJames » Sat Mar 7, 2009 11:05 pm

Ghost of the Garden wrote:
LeBronxJames wrote:MR.Allen very good player! I like like his shooting!

Gotta love ballboys.


me too. i like ballboys :D :D
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,422
And1: 23,552
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: 63-0 

Post#8 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Sat Mar 7, 2009 11:21 pm

Pierce should be the one talking about TO's..dude gets the most ridiculous turnover's...if he handled the ball less, maybe the Celtics would lose less games...Paul and Eddie..neither should be bringing up the ball EVER..specially if Rondo or Marbury are in the game..don't you guys just hate when Rondo is in the game and Pierce brings it up, runs into some double teams, tries to spin out and gets a TO??Ughhh I hate that...

Good topic by the way...that's impressive..
♣ WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎♣ THANK YOU TRUTH! ♣
User avatar
TA42
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,813
And1: 772
Joined: Sep 11, 2004
Location: MA
     

Re: 49-0 

Post#9 » by TA42 » Sun Mar 8, 2009 4:02 pm

I take it the 63-0 wasn't correct?

49-0 isn't nearly as impressive....just kidding. :)

The C's are simply unstoppable when they take care of the ball which is exactly what Doc preaches all the time.

Quite simple.....limit the opponents attempts at the basket.....better chance of winning.
7seventynine9
Senior
Posts: 710
And1: 373
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

Re: 49-0 

Post#10 » by 7seventynine9 » Mon Mar 9, 2009 12:51 am

I bet you'd come up with similiar records for other teams using the less than 11 TO benchmark as well.
User avatar
Al-Haqq
Starter
Posts: 2,136
And1: 1
Joined: May 30, 2007

Re: 49-0 

Post#11 » by Al-Haqq » Mon Mar 9, 2009 12:54 am

Thank you goes to Pierce who had 6 of our 17 turnovers against the Magic.
User avatar
realfung
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,960
And1: 44
Joined: May 22, 2007
 

Re: 49-0 

Post#12 » by realfung » Mon Mar 9, 2009 6:52 am

sometimes I think this kind of stats are stupid.

Suns score 125 points and they are only 42-2.

Or if you shoot more than 65%, you win.


Is this a secret to you?
User avatar
Cyclical
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,766
And1: 3,397
Joined: Nov 13, 2005
     

Re: 49-0 

Post#13 » by Cyclical » Mon Mar 9, 2009 8:44 am

realfung wrote:sometimes I think this kind of stats are stupid.

Suns score 125 points and they are only 42-2.

Or if you shoot more than 65%, you win.


Is this a secret to you?


Not the same at all. There's a specific point to this thread -- the Celtics have the league's 3rd worst TO rate at 15.82. Only OK and the Suns are worse. It' something they should drastically improve on. I can't recall a championship team averaging so many turnovers in recent memory. When they cut down on their turnovers they usually win (they only have 3 losses at 12 TO's and under)


7seventynine9, teams obviously get more wins and less losses when they turn the ball over less. But undefeated at 11 and under is pretty damn rare.

TA42, yes, my bad - I added 49 and 14, rather than just leave the 14 alone (a loss is a loss - no "what if's"...) I guess that's why I chose music over math as a profession.
User avatar
Tricky Ricky
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: HAVERHILL MA

Re: TO's 

Post#14 » by Tricky Ricky » Mon Mar 9, 2009 1:03 pm

AlCelticFan wrote:63-0 is damn impressive. TO's are just such an important stat, every TO is giving away free points...


Bill Walton once said the great John Wooden use to say the team who has more TO's is the team that usually wins, and he's considered one of the greatest ever... :D
Quote of the year
MyInsatiableOne wrote:Did we just seriously post Danny's personal address and phone # on the board? :o
User avatar
MyInsatiableOne
General Manager
Posts: 9,319
And1: 180
Joined: Mar 25, 2005
Location: Midwest via New England
Contact:
     

Re: 49-0 

Post#15 » by MyInsatiableOne » Mon Mar 9, 2009 1:06 pm

Well they were pretty bad at turning it over last year and this year it's worse. If you think of all the points other teams get off of our turnovers, that's probably another 6-8 wins for us if we had taken better care of the ball...
It's still 17 to 11!!!!

Return to Boston Celtics