TO vs. Ocho Cinco
TO vs. Ocho Cinco
- kooldude
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,823
- And1: 78
- Joined: Jul 08, 2007
TO vs. Ocho Cinco
Who's better?
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,013
- And1: 18,087
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
- The_Child_Prodigy
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,396
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 03, 2005
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,013
- And1: 18,087
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
I think Chad is great, but he is a bit overrated IMO.
He has never put together a season where he made you say "wow" or where I actually felt he was the best receiver, yet he gets tagged with that a lot.
He has never had 100 catches, he's hit 10 TD's once(10 exactly), and his career high is 1432 yards.
HE's a solid top receiver in the game, but TO was ARGUABLY the top receiver in the game, and I have never felt there was a compelling argument for Chad.
Right now, I would take Chad, but I still think TO is a tad better, but meh.
He has never put together a season where he made you say "wow" or where I actually felt he was the best receiver, yet he gets tagged with that a lot.
He has never had 100 catches, he's hit 10 TD's once(10 exactly), and his career high is 1432 yards.
HE's a solid top receiver in the game, but TO was ARGUABLY the top receiver in the game, and I have never felt there was a compelling argument for Chad.
Right now, I would take Chad, but I still think TO is a tad better, but meh.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,238
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 18, 2004
You basically have the best guy against single coverage in the NFL (Johnson) against the guy who is the best at beating multiple defenders in the NFL (TO).** So I guess it just depends on what you need. If you have a good group of receivers, Johnson is great because his impressive all-around skill set guarantees no one can take him 1 vs. 1, and you need to have help sent his way. But if you had a **** group of WRs, TO would be best. He is impossible to jam at the line, and amazing at using his size to always get the 1st shot at the football, so double teams don't seem to really affect his game as much as other WRs. I guess if forced to choose I'd say Johnson, because his versatility guarantees every team could use him effectively. But for certain teams, particularly those without a lot of other threats, you'd want TO and his ability to be a one man offense.
**As a side note, IMO Holt is best against zone coverage.
**As a side note, IMO Holt is best against zone coverage.
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
- etopn23
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,072
- And1: 160
- Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
^^ Maybe if Randy Moss wasn't in the league.
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
- cowboys4life
- Junior
- Posts: 335
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 14, 2008
- Location: the Gridiron
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
T.O all the way
hes done much more in his career then Chad has
hes done much more in his career then Chad has
Trust The Process
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
- Ong_dynasty
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,383
- And1: 351
- Joined: May 28, 2003
- Location: London
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
I like chad!!But I never ever once thought you can consider him the best receiver or a H-O-F receiver...While T.O you can..
Chad is there and there abouts..
But I think T.O is up there.
****COMING FROM AN EAGLES FAN*******
Chad is there and there abouts..
But I think T.O is up there.
****COMING FROM AN EAGLES FAN*******
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,594
- And1: 1
- Joined: Feb 11, 2007
Re: TO vs. Ocho Cinco
T.O. I'd prolly take Terrell over Randy too (not a boys fan)