ImageImageImage

Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 16,992
And1: 10,687
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#1 » by return2glory » Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:56 pm

Marbury is playing like crap. It is looking like a bad signing because he is hurting the team instead of helping right now. I rather have House out of the floor with Tony Allen once TA comes back. A combination of TA and House is better than Marbury and House. TA gives us a better chance to win games than Marbury.

Come playoff time, the rosters get shorter. We will be playing mainly a 8 or 9 man rotation. The guys I went coming off the bench are House, BBD, Powe, and TA. It's seems like the additions of Moore and Marbury aren't going to help us much in the playoffs.

Even when Marbury gets in better shape, I still don't like the small backcourt of House and SM. Is anyone else disappointed in Marbury's play? He isn't giving us much on offense and even less on defense.
Gant
RealGM
Posts: 10,944
And1: 15,278
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen reurns 

Post#2 » by Gant » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:06 pm

He's on a PJ Brown regain-his-skills curve. He's almost there. Give it a little more time.
User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,422
And1: 23,552
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen reurns 

Post#3 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:12 pm

Mhm..who baks up Rondo?? House? Or Pierce? Come on now..of course Marbury will play...he has been getting better, so has Mikki....He is getting alot of assists for the limited minutes he has been playing..give it some time. He has been trying really hard on D too....
♣ WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎♣ THANK YOU TRUTH! ♣
MaxwellSmart
General Manager
Posts: 7,581
And1: 2,326
Joined: Jun 17, 2007

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen reurns 

Post#4 » by MaxwellSmart » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:13 pm

This Should be re-titled..."Bill Walker deserves ALL Tony Allen's minutes"

TA's return has NOTHING to do with Marbury's play----Stephon is here to take over Gabe's role.
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 16,992
And1: 10,687
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen reurns 

Post#5 » by return2glory » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:25 pm

MaxwellSmart wrote:This Should be re-titled..."Bill Walker deserves ALL Tony Allen's minutes"

TA's return has NOTHING to do with Marbury's play----Stephon is here to take over Gabe's role.


TA has a lot to do with Marbury's minutes, and so does House. Rondo plays about 36 minutes a game. That leaves 12 minutes at the back up PG spot. Ray Allen plays about 32 minutes at SG and the rest at SF, that leaves 16 minutes at the SG spot.

If TA plays gets about 14-16 minutes at the back up SG, then that only leaves about 12 minutes a game at the back up PG spot. Who would you have play about 12-15 minutes a game, House or Marbury. I would go with House because he is a difference maker.
MaxwellSmart
General Manager
Posts: 7,581
And1: 2,326
Joined: Jun 17, 2007

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen reurns 

Post#6 » by MaxwellSmart » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:27 pm

I doubt TA will see many minutes at all---unless someone else gets hurt---he's been out too long--the team has moved on from the TA timeline.
Dave_From_NB
Starter
Posts: 2,076
And1: 1,538
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Location: Quispamsis, New Brunswick (not New Bedford!)
   

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#7 » by Dave_From_NB » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:53 pm

House has had 4 assists in a game once this season. Marbury has done it 5 times in 58 fewer games.

The offense on the second unit dies when House is in there at the point, that's why for the last 2 years the Celtics have looked for a late season addition at PG.

TA isn't likely to get many minutes in the playoffs, I expect just some defensive assignments on occasion. House will be out there for his shot as SG, but Marbury will be the backup point.
User avatar
SuigintouEV
General Manager
Posts: 7,939
And1: 1,556
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Contact:
   

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#8 » by SuigintouEV » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:07 pm

Stephon Per 36 stats

6.0 ppg on 32.0% TS
6.0 apg
3.6 turnovers
0.5 steals
2.8 fouls

Every SINGLE ONE OF THOSE things is by and far worse than any other year steph has had, per 36, and he's usually averaged more than 36 minutes anyways. And he hasn't exactly looked slow out there. He's still trying to get his game and rhythm back.

Tony Allen per 36

14.7 ppg on 53.7% TS
2.5 apg
3.1 turnovers
2.4 spg
4.1 fouls

so even though Steph has been absolutely awful - he still fouls less and assists WAY better than tony allen. Expect his turnovers / shooting efficiency to round out, and i'm sure his steals will see a slight increase as well. At that point you'll have to ask yourself: is it worth it to generate about less than a steal more per game, if it means fouling less, and getting a hell of a lot more bench playmaking?

Let's say at worse, stephon gets back to how good he was last year. Per 36 thats

14.9 ppg on 52.7% TS
5.1 apg
2.1 turnovers
0.9 spg
2.5 fouls

Still better than Tony Allen could hope to be. And honestly I think with less minutes, more emphasis on defense, once he rounds into shape his steals will be better than that, and I think his assists will be more like they'e already been than how they were last year. The slight dip in true shooting percentage is well worth the assists, less turnovers, and less fouls.


Now finally it comes to your argument about the small backcourt, and I agree to an extent that the Steph/House backcourt has size issues. But it's a bench, not many teams have regular sized 2 guards, even playoff teams rely on combo guards to fill the 2 or Backup 2 spot - guys like Roger Mason, Courtney Lee, Delonte West, Sasha Vujacic. Do those names scare you as guys that are gunna kill Stephon Marbury off the dribble and score over him?

As long as doc doesn't have him guarding 3-4 tweeners like Hermann he should be fine.
Image
"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
User avatar
armageddon
Rookie
Posts: 1,168
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2006

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#9 » by armageddon » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:16 pm

Allen will play less in this year's playoffs than he did last year. Enough said.

Marbury doesn't make stupid plays, TA is a basketball moron.
User avatar
Avalanche
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,522
And1: 1,498
Joined: May 21, 2007
Location: Australia
Contact:
     

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#10 » by Avalanche » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:32 pm

wow i dont know what you've been watching but i see good things when Steph is on the court... it was always going to take a while for him to get back into a rythm on the court, but the guy just creates plays for other people, something no one else on the bench can do.. especially Tony Allen
Image
BillessuR6
General Manager
Posts: 8,785
And1: 2,611
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
 

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#11 » by BillessuR6 » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:45 pm

What are you talking about. The guy hasn`t played basketball in a year, is he supposed to be in top form from the start? He has another month before I expect him to show his real game...

PJ looked horrible in the regular season last year but was great in the playoffs. Just be patient...
User avatar
mr_sunshine
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,430
And1: 482
Joined: Jun 30, 2007

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#12 » by mr_sunshine » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:51 pm

Damnit, I thought R2G was gone. I knew it was about time for another ridiculous post.
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,146
And1: 14,187
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#13 » by greenbeans » Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:54 pm

You guys should start an e-gang, you, Spud, Joebiscuit etc.. Can call yourselves the Jump-The-Gun Johnny's or something of that ilk
Rocky5000
Analyst
Posts: 3,386
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#14 » by Rocky5000 » Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:59 pm

Here's what will happen. Marbury will no longer play any minutes with Rondo as backup SG. House will play no minutes at backup PG and be a situational SG. Tony Allen will play backup SG and backup SF when Eddie is on the floor. Bill Walker won't get any playing time. Neither Marbury or House are great defenders at the SG position because of their height and short arms, you end up with things like the Brandon Rush vs. Marbury situation without TA out there.. Every team we are likely to face has the focal point of their offense on a wing player, except for Orlando.
User avatar
3pt %
General Manager
Posts: 8,378
And1: 2,790
Joined: Oct 27, 2003

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#15 » by 3pt % » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:04 pm

I dont think House will be taken out of the line up that easily, he has shown that he can be our instant offence off the the bench.
Captain_Caveman wrote:Probably couldn't spell "cat" if you spotted him the C and the A.
joneb
Junior
Posts: 468
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 06, 2004

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#16 » by joneb » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:31 pm

I'm pleased with how the ball is moving on the second unit, since Steph arrived. His penetrating and dishing has given them a weapon which that unit lacked before. As others have noted, he is only going to get better as he gets more minutes under his belt. Tony Allen's return should have little, if any, effect upon Stephon's playing time.

The premise that Marbury not play once Allen gets back is absurd.
Kefa461
RealGM
Posts: 12,530
And1: 430
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: Member of Celtic Nation since '64
       

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#17 » by Kefa461 » Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:05 pm

Stop the insanity....... 8-)

ps.....Starbaby will be Rondo's backup and if TA gets minutes it's at the sf position....he might be out the door in a trade next season....Walker looks might good....Starbaby might be here next year.... 8-)
WE ARE CELTIC NATION
17 TITLES, ON TO #18.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#18 » by sunshinekids99 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:07 am

I think Marbury has been playing much better of late. With time I think his shot will start to come back as well.

As for Tony Allen, I see no reason for him to touch the court. His IQ is terrible out there and he's nothing more than an average defender.
Image
User avatar
SuigintouEV
General Manager
Posts: 7,939
And1: 1,556
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Contact:
   

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#19 » by SuigintouEV » Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:20 am

greenbeans wrote:You guys should start an e-gang, you, Spud, Joebiscuit etc.. Can call yourselves the Jump-The-Gun Johnny's or something of that ilk



Your sig made me laugh
Image
"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
threrf23
RealGM
Posts: 15,017
And1: 4,960
Joined: Mar 22, 2004

Re: Marbury shouldn't play once Tony Allen returns 

Post#20 » by threrf23 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:37 am

I disagree with the notion that Tony is only an average defender. We don't need him on the floor and I don't agree with the full-on premise of this thread. But, I wouldn't mind seeing Tony off the bench before Marbury and Doc can then make adjustments based on how Tony is playing. Or, I wouldn't mind seeing Marbury/House/Eddie on the floor at the same time for a little bit in the 1st half and then Doc can make his adjustments from there.

Return to Boston Celtics