ImageImageImageImageImage

Richmond is #5.

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
SharoneWright
RealGM
Posts: 28,533
And1: 13,119
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: A pig in a cage on antibiotics
     

Richmond is #5. 

Post#1 » by SharoneWright » Wed Apr 1, 2009 7:09 pm

http://www.thestar.com/Sports/article/611853

Its Richmond over Mills.

For now.
Is anybody here a marine biologist?
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,098
And1: 3,629
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#2 » by s e n s i » Wed Apr 1, 2009 7:25 pm

I think if Mills' last outing was at least decent, he would have got it. This has more to do with Mills getting rocked than Richmond pitching great.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Modern_epic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,458
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 03, 2003

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#3 » by Modern_epic » Wed Apr 1, 2009 7:31 pm

Along with that, Barrett is officially our back up C.
evilRyu
General Manager
Posts: 8,394
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 23, 2006

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#4 » by evilRyu » Wed Apr 1, 2009 9:00 pm

lol silly me, i thought this meant that Richmond was wearing jersey #5
arrpy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,220
And1: 5
Joined: May 05, 2007
Location: N.L

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#5 » by arrpy » Wed Apr 1, 2009 10:09 pm

evilRyu wrote:lol silly me, i thought this meant that Richmond was wearing jersey #5


Luckily I read an article on this before I even saw the thread, or else I would of thought the same thing. :lol:
Mustard_Tiger
Banned User
Posts: 4,793
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 16, 2009

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#6 » by Mustard_Tiger » Thu Apr 2, 2009 5:28 am

chocolateSensi wrote:I think if Mills' last outing was at least decent, he would have got it. This has more to do with Mills getting rocked than Richmond pitching great.

Either way, Cecil is going to be up to take this job (or Romero's I suppose) by May.

Richmond is fine for now...at least he throws strikes.
evilRyu
General Manager
Posts: 8,394
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 23, 2006

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#7 » by evilRyu » Fri Apr 3, 2009 12:51 am

strange how Richmond got the nod as the 5th starter only because Mills had a bad outing. I didn't think that was the fair thing to do, considering Richmond stunk it out today as well...
Modern_epic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,458
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 03, 2003

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#8 » by Modern_epic » Fri Apr 3, 2009 6:23 am

strange how Richmond got the nod as the 5th starter only because Mills had a bad outing. I didn't think that was the fair thing to do, considering Richmond stunk it out today as well...


Not really strange at all.

When a 24 year old prospect you are really high on stinks it up, you want him back in the minors to work out what went wrong. If a 29 year old future journeyman sucks it up, you leave him out there until you have a better option.

(Also, to be less pesamistic, a) Richmond has shown an ability to pitch against major leaguers that Mills has yet to, and b) Richmond hasn't had enough innings to get fully into shape yet, thanks to Team Canada.)
User avatar
kelso
Analyst
Posts: 3,549
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 02, 2001
Location: Innisfil ON...the centre of the Universe

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#9 » by kelso » Fri Apr 3, 2009 10:41 am

Mustard_Tiger wrote:
chocolateSensi wrote:I think if Mills' last outing was at least decent, he would have got it. This has more to do with Mills getting rocked than Richmond pitching great.

Either way, Cecil is going to be up to take this job (or Romero's I suppose) by May.

Richmond is fine for now...at least he throws strikes.


Agreed- Brett Cecil will be with this team soon, but we wont have 3 lefties in the rotation. Something else will have to be done.
spykelee
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,111
And1: 2,995
Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#10 » by spykelee » Fri Apr 3, 2009 11:17 am

** Thumbs down** Richmond's garbage. Best case scenario for him is to get us to the fifth inning and to still have a chance at winning, and that's only on his good days. Our division is going to tee of on this guy like he's a pitching coach at the home run contest.
Michael Bradley
General Manager
Posts: 9,485
And1: 2,161
Joined: Feb 25, 2004

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#11 » by Michael Bradley » Fri Apr 3, 2009 1:21 pm

Mills has only thrown 66 innings above low-A. He is clearly not ready to be a Major League contributor yet. Richmond is what he is. It is safer to just let Richmond start every 5th day until Cecil/Mills is ready, rather than rush a pitcher who would be in over his head at the MLB level.
evilRyu
General Manager
Posts: 8,394
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 23, 2006

Re: Richmond is #5. 

Post#12 » by evilRyu » Fri Apr 3, 2009 10:34 pm

Modern_epic wrote:
strange how Richmond got the nod as the 5th starter only because Mills had a bad outing. I didn't think that was the fair thing to do, considering Richmond stunk it out today as well...


Not really strange at all.

When a 24 year old prospect you are really high on stinks it up, you want him back in the minors to work out what went wrong. If a 29 year old future journeyman sucks it up, you leave him out there until you have a better option.

(Also, to be less pesamistic, a) Richmond has shown an ability to pitch against major leaguers that Mills has yet to, and b) Richmond hasn't had enough innings to get fully into shape yet, thanks to Team Canada.)

well i was saying that it wasn't fair in the sense that the 5th spot was to be determined by the performance of both respective pitchers in their final outing. They made the decision after Mills' bad performance without having Richmond have his "audition".

Return to Toronto Blue Jays


cron