ImageImage

Projected 53-man roster

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,763
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Projected 53-man roster 

Post#1 » by LUKE23 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:33 pm

I assume others will have variances, just thought we'd look quick at what the Packers roster looks like. Of this draft class, I think Raji, Matthews, Lang, Meredith, Johnson, and Underwood all make it. Here is my prediction:

QB (3): Rodgers/Brohm/Flynn
RB (3): Grant/Jackson/Wynn
FB (2): Hall/Johnson
WR (5): Jennings/Driver/Jones/Nelson/Martin
TE (3): Lee/Finley/Humphrey
OL (9): Clifton/Colledge/Spitz/Sitton/Giacomini/Lang/Meredith/Barbre/Preston

DL (6): Jenkins/Pickett/Raji/Harrell/Jolly/Montgomery
LB (8): Matthews/Barnett/Hawk/Kampman/Poppinga/Thompson/Chillar/Hunter
DB (11): Harris/Woodson/Williams/Blackmon/Lee/Bigby/Collins/Rouse/Bush/Underwood/Smith
Specialists (3): Crosby/Kapinos/Goode

I was looking at it and 11 DB's seems like too many, so maybe Bush or Rouse goes there, but I really think Underwood makes the team. 6 DL may not seem like enough, but I don't know who else is worth keeping there barring adding Carter or Holliday.
Jollay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,024
And1: 661
Joined: Apr 25, 2003

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#2 » by Jollay » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:42 pm

Seems pretty spot on analysis to me, and much appreciated because of my laziness to do the same thing.

There's usually one undrafted that comes out of nowhere; I would agree that any FA signing or surprise would likely take a victim out of the secondary. I think you will definitely see a trade or two as well to dump our excess.

Of course it depends who comes to camp out of shape or disinterested as well...

Despite cashing in our picks for Matthews, we still clearly will have good competition in camp...
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,763
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#3 » by LUKE23 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:48 pm

Looking at it again, I don't think they keep 11 DB. More likely 9-10. They will have some tough decisions there. My guess is they do keep another big body on the DL just in case there is injury.

This also might be a year we only keep two TE's, depending on how the other positions shake out.
Jollay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,024
And1: 661
Joined: Apr 25, 2003

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#4 » by Jollay » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:03 pm

LUKE23 wrote:This also might be a year we only keep two TE's, depending on how the other positions shake out.


Very good point. In fact I think it will be. Finley doesn't have to be a world beater yet but he better show some progress...and Humphrey needs to really show something.

Heck if both do, maybe we trade Lee....

there's a big ST factor here as well...
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,851
And1: 42,153
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#5 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:07 pm

I think Bishop will absolutely be the #1 backup middle linebacker. I'd release Bush or move Underwood to the practice squad. I also can see them keeping Jarius Wynn on the 53 man if he can put on 10 lbs.
User avatar
Rockmaninoff
General Manager
Posts: 7,710
And1: 1,713
Joined: Jan 11, 2008
   

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#6 » by Rockmaninoff » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:43 pm

I could see the Packers trading Jeremy Thompson. One converted DE to OLB is enough.

I think one of Poppinga or Chillar could be released, to make way for less expensive players with more upside. I agree that Bishop should be the backup at ILB.

I wouldn't be sad to see Rouse and Bush go bye-bye. To me, Rouse looks more like a 4-3 outside linebacker than a safety, and Bush looks like a good special teams player, but not someone who should ever play on defense.

Training camp will be very interesting for the OL, LB, and DB groups, that's for sure.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:The fight for civil rights just like for liberty and justice and peace won't be won by man. It will take a god...so lets move on to sports.

Magic Giannison wrote:Giannis is god but even god's cannot save our **** team.
Jollay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,024
And1: 661
Joined: Apr 25, 2003

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#7 » by Jollay » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:45 pm

DrugBust wrote:I think Bishop will absolutely be the #1 backup middle linebacker. I'd release Bush or move Underwood to the practice squad. I also can see them keeping Jarius Wynn on the 53 man if he can put on 10 lbs.


Yeah, just set a weight between him and Montgomery and first one there has a job.

But can't just take the fatburger route, has to be in conditioning as well.

In honor of this, I will try and go from 205 to 285 this offseason. I have the frame, but do I have the mettle?

My knees will thank me.
Jollay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,024
And1: 661
Joined: Apr 25, 2003

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#8 » by Jollay » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:46 pm

Rockmaninoff wrote:I could see the Packers trading Jeremy Thompson. One converted DE to OLB is enough.

I think one of Poppinga or Chillar could be released, to make way for less expensive players with more upside. I agree that Bishop should be the backup at ILB.

I wouldn't be sad to see Rouse and Bush go bye-bye. To me, Rouse looks more like a 4-3 outside linebacker than a safety, and Bush looks like a good special teams player, but not someone who should ever play on defense.

Training camp will be very interesting for the OL, LB, and DB groups, that's for sure.


Can't see Bush going unfortunately. Rouse is prime target for termination (of services).
User avatar
Wade-A-Holic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,055
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 09, 2003

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#9 » by Wade-A-Holic » Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:22 pm

Rockmaninoff wrote:I could see the Packers trading Jeremy Thompson. One converted DE to OLB is enough.

I think one of Poppinga or Chillar could be released, to make way for less expensive players with more upside. I agree that Bishop should be the backup at ILB.

I wouldn't be sad to see Rouse and Bush go bye-bye. To me, Rouse looks more like a 4-3 outside linebacker than a safety, and Bush looks like a good special teams player, but not someone who should ever play on defense.

Training camp will be very interesting for the OL, LB, and DB groups, that's for sure.


Thompson won't be traded. Many scouts projected him to a 34 outside linebacker when he came out and it's not like we'll get anything for him in a trade at this point.
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#10 » by eagle13 » Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:01 am

Subtract 1 DB for 10 total - either smith or rouse is cut.
Add 1 LB for 9 total - Bishop definetly sticks.

Replace Montgomery with Malone OR either Carter or Holiday is signed.

Odds are probably lose at least one or two of these 53 to season ending injury in preseason.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#11 » by El Duderino » Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:31 am

I think Kuhn makes it at FB over Hall
User avatar
aaprigs311
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,425
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Titletown

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#12 » by aaprigs311 » Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:01 pm

El Duderino wrote:I think Kuhn makes it at FB over Hall


Can't see it. Hall was a special teams beast last season. Not that Kuhn was bad either, but I'd give Hall the nod.
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#13 » by eagle13 » Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:55 pm

IF the Pack needs another roster spot - say for a 7th DL then maybe -

IF Barbre or Beno show zero progress (they may develop great and start) or Lang or Meredith really bust (don't see it) one might get cut. Pack has generally carried 8 OL under TT.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,763
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Projected 53-man roster 

Post#14 » by LUKE23 » Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:57 pm

I thought 7 DL would be a lock, but I only see six worth keeping at all.

I also think Humphrey is in trouble if Finley has a good camp at TE.

Return to Green Bay Packers