ImageImageImageImageImage

So, Whose fault was it?

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#61 » by SacKingZZZ » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:02 am

Smills91 wrote:I blame Ailene Poison. Ever since she came to the Bee, the Kings have gone downhill. Now she's pushed out Marty McNeal AND Mark Kreidler....she sucks the life out of everything she thinks/writes about.


I think the Bee as a whole has done it's best to push the drama surrounding the Kings, whatever it might be at any given point, to the forefront regardless of how many positives there are to talk about. It's really sad.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#62 » by Smills91 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:34 pm

SacKingZZZ wrote:
Smills91 wrote:I blame Ailene Poison. Ever since she came to the Bee, the Kings have gone downhill. Now she's pushed out Marty McNeal AND Mark Kreidler....she sucks the life out of everything she thinks/writes about.


I think the Bee as a whole has done it's best to push the drama surrounding the Kings, whatever it might be at any given point, to the forefront regardless of how many positives there are to talk about. It's really sad.

Newspapers tend to suck overall. Huge bias, crappy articles, sensationalized news. It's no wonder so many papers are failing. I use the Bee for ONE thing. Sam Amick as the Kings beat writer. After that, the rest, as KIE would put it, is just expensive toilet paper with ink.
User avatar
_SRV_
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: brew for breakfast

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#63 » by _SRV_ » Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:07 pm

mitchweber wrote:
I just don't think they really qualify as playing different positions, but whatever. Like I said, this isn't really related to what I'm really talking about.

And I just want you to make sure that you see the irony of calling something "petty" and then continuing to argue about it.

Okay. Forgive me. I meant to. I was well aware that the Maloofs had paid the tax before.

Sure. And my point wasn't really to argue that the Maloofs were cheap for doing otherwise.

:lol: It's a clarification dude--one that, given the above quote, you seem to agree with. Chill out.


You respond to a post I made with a dramatic "Woah" and "let's look at the actual facts" and later on fail to stick to any of the points you made.
Please, if you still see an issue with my post, man up, make a clear argument and put it, otherwise, please stop this lame back and forth spin game, it's getting old.
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Kobe gets bailed out more than Wall Street.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,812
And1: 37,037
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#64 » by RIPskaterdude » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:49 pm

Smills91 wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:
Smills91 wrote:I blame Ailene Poison. Ever since she came to the Bee, the Kings have gone downhill. Now she's pushed out Marty McNeal AND Mark Kreidler....she sucks the life out of everything she thinks/writes about.


I think the Bee as a whole has done it's best to push the drama surrounding the Kings, whatever it might be at any given point, to the forefront regardless of how many positives there are to talk about. It's really sad.

Newspapers tend to suck overall. Huge bias, crappy articles, sensationalized news. It's no wonder so many papers are failing. I use the Bee for ONE thing. Sam Amick as the Kings beat writer. After that, the rest, as KIE would put it, is just expensive toilet paper with ink.


In other words, if a writer on the Bee has a different opinion than you, it's extremely biased and terrible, sensationalized news. :roll:
Image
User avatar
SacTown Kings
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,857
And1: 177
Joined: May 12, 2003

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#65 » by SacTown Kings » Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:15 am

Smills91 wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:
Smills91 wrote:I blame Ailene Poison. Ever since she came to the Bee, the Kings have gone downhill. Now she's pushed out Marty McNeal AND Mark Kreidler....she sucks the life out of everything she thinks/writes about.


I think the Bee as a whole has done it's best to push the drama surrounding the Kings, whatever it might be at any given point, to the forefront regardless of how many positives there are to talk about. It's really sad.

Newspapers tend to suck overall. Huge bias, crappy articles, sensationalized news. It's no wonder so many papers are failing. I use the Bee for ONE thing. Sam Amick as the Kings beat writer. After that, the rest, as KIE would put it, is just expensive toilet paper with ink.


You sound like Michael Savage,lol. I tend to agree, although every paper tends to sensationalize topics the Bee really doesn't have much to choose from locally except the Kings. And I have refused to read anything Ailene has written ever since that one article about Peja being so manly and strong or something like that. I had that throw up taste in my mouth for 3 days.
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#66 » by pillwenney » Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:55 pm

_SRV_ wrote:
You respond to a post I made with a dramatic "Woah" and "let's look at the actual facts" and later on fail to stick to any of the points you made.
Please, if you still see an issue with my post, man up, make a clear argument and put it, otherwise, please stop this lame back and forth spin game, it's getting old.


Dude, I'm just responding to your points as you make them. Everything outside of the coaching was outside of what I was arguing. I wasn't in this thread to talk about the Maloofs spending habits, I just stepped in because I though you were misrepresenting some things. I agree that they can spend their money however they want. It's not really what I was arguing about.

But whatever, you want to say I'm "not sticking to my point" by acknowledging that Petrie had our past coaches on a list of candidates, then fine. I'm not going to bother making the argument, because I just did continue the argument and then you accused me of going back on it. I don't know what you really want.
User avatar
ezekielbear
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 12, 2006
Location: Sun Diego
Contact:

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#67 » by ezekielbear » Fri May 1, 2009 5:17 am

There is a lot of drama in the Bee, without a doubt...though I think Sam does a great job of reporting the facts. But, it is their job to sell papers too.

SCH (well he did) and Aliene do tend to push it a bit though when it comes to picking a target. Just their style.
User avatar
_SRV_
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: brew for breakfast

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#68 » by _SRV_ » Fri May 1, 2009 10:56 am

mitchweber wrote:Dude, I'm just responding to your points as you make them. Everything outside of the coaching was outside of what I was arguing. I wasn't in this thread to talk about the Maloofs spending habits, I just stepped in because I though you were misrepresenting some things. I agree that they can spend their money however they want. It's not really what I was arguing about.

I didn't misrepresent, in fact I was consistently backing up everything I say, you on the hand, threw your post, and then started to hide "that's wasn't what I'm arguiung" "that's not my point", when in reality you said nothing.
Seriously, if you have something to respond, do it, this hiding and spinning game is getting annoying.
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Kobe gets bailed out more than Wall Street.
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#69 » by pillwenney » Sun May 3, 2009 12:26 am

_SRV_ wrote:I didn't misrepresent, in fact I was consistently backing up everything I say, you on the hand, threw your post, and then started to hide "that's wasn't what I'm arguiung" "that's not my point", when in reality you said nothing.
Seriously, if you have something to respond, do it, this hiding and spinning game is getting annoying.



I just don't think that's what I was doing. I think some things were mis-communicated, and then when I said that they were mis-communicated, you said I was hiding. I'm sorry if something isn't my point, but I kept making points about the coaching thing, so I don't know what to say.

You can respond to this again, and keep attacking my manhood for not arguing as you see fit on a basketball message board if you want, but I'm done here. I've made my point about the coaching, so I don't really care.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,684
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#70 » by OGSactownballer » Sun May 3, 2009 12:54 am

The thing that strikes me with the Bee is that they seem to have become very subtly biased AGAINST the whole arena plan and that coincides with the overreporting of the (mostly created) drama around the team.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#71 » by Smills91 » Sun May 3, 2009 1:56 am

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:
Smills91 wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:
I think the Bee as a whole has done it's best to push the drama surrounding the Kings, whatever it might be at any given point, to the forefront regardless of how many positives there are to talk about. It's really sad.

Newspapers tend to suck overall. Huge bias, crappy articles, sensationalized news. It's no wonder so many papers are failing. I use the Bee for ONE thing. Sam Amick as the Kings beat writer. After that, the rest, as KIE would put it, is just expensive toilet paper with ink.


In other words, if a writer on the Bee has a different opinion than you, it's extremely biased and terrible, sensationalized news. :roll:


No the fact that print journalism is failing as a whole today is a major indicator that newspapers suck and my reasoning has a LARGE portion to do with that.

AV is a prime example of everything that is wrong with print journalism.
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,812
And1: 37,037
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#72 » by RIPskaterdude » Sun May 3, 2009 2:01 am

Smills91 wrote:No the fact that print journalism is failing as a whole today is a major indicator that newspapers suck and my reasoning has a LARGE portion to do with that.

AV is a prime example of everything that is wrong with print journalism.


PRINT journalism is failing because people can get it off the internet for FREE, not because of people like AV.
Image
User avatar
_SRV_
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: brew for breakfast

Re: So, Whose fault was it? 

Post#73 » by _SRV_ » Sun May 3, 2009 4:56 pm

mitchweber wrote:

I just don't think that's what I was doing. I think some things were mis-communicated, and then when I said that they were mis-communicated, you said I was hiding. I'm sorry if something isn't my point, but I kept making points about the coaching thing, so I don't know what to say.

You can respond to this again, and keep attacking my manhood for not arguing as you see fit on a basketball message board if you want, but I'm done here. I've made my point about the coaching, so I don't really care.


I didn't question your manhood, I questioned your spins and backpedaling answers, which are still here, and I opened this thread to clarify my point on the bias of the pro-Petrie camp, and the blind Maloofs hate, and I believe I made it the point clear, this conversation is a great example of that.
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Kobe gets bailed out more than Wall Street.

Return to Sacramento Kings