ImageImageImageImageImage

The Blue Jays are this year's Rays?

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
LittleOzzy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 35,033
And1: 4,198
Joined: Dec 19, 2005
       

The Blue Jays are this year's Rays? 

Post#1 » by LittleOzzy » Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:22 pm

Image

Stepping into the breach are the Toronto Blue Jays, holders of first place in the AL East and owners of the biggest positive run differential (40 more runs scored than allowed) in the junior circuit heading into Wednesday's games. Writing for NBC Sports, Bert Blyleven tagged the Jays as possessing a potent enough offense to overcome the team's litany of pitching injuries and make a run at the division crown.

You'll find few bigger advocates for Blyleven's candidacy than yours truly (this guy's certainly one of 'em), but circle me this, Bert: Have you seen these players' track records? Marco Scutaro has hit four homers with a .415 on-base percentage so far this season (he has never hit double-digit homers in a season and owns a career OBP of .328); Aaron Hill's hitting .371 (career average: .288); Adam Lind's hitting .314 (.277); Lyle Overbay's slugging 89 points better than his career average; journeymen Jose Bautista and Kevin Millar have gone nuts in 69 part-time at-bats. Only Alex Rios (.237/.298/.355) is hitting substantially below expectations. It's theoretically possible that a team of established veterans, mixed with a couple of promising kids, suddenly hits like the '95 Indians for a full season. Just don't bet on it. The Blue Jays have gotten fat on a soft schedule; in fact they've yet to play a single game against an AL East foe.


http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/b ... ml?eref=T1
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,232
And1: 31,818
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: The Blue Jays are this year's Rays? 

Post#2 » by tsherkin » Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:57 pm

Bit of a misleading thread title, since that article actually talks about why the Jays probably aren't this year's Rays. It offers more arguments for why we'll regress to the mean than it does anything else.
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,098
And1: 3,629
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: The Blue Jays are this year's Rays? 

Post#3 » by s e n s i » Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:22 pm

And this years Rays are the '07 Tigers.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
User avatar
Holmes
Analyst
Posts: 3,395
And1: 3
Joined: Nov 14, 2003
Location: Toronto

Re: The Blue Jays are this year's Rays? 

Post#4 » by Holmes » Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:54 pm

You mean the Rays are the '07 Rockies who would be the '06 Tigers who would be the '05 White Sox who would be the '03 Marlins who would be the '98 Padres.

So the '98 Padres started the "awesomeness-out-of-nowhere-then-back-to-being-not-awesome" theme.
User avatar
LLJ
RealGM
Posts: 53,830
And1: 18,082
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Unfixed

Re: The Blue Jays are this year's Rays? 

Post#5 » by LLJ » Fri May 1, 2009 7:27 pm

The pitching will eventually come back down to earth. Or rather, go into the sky. LOL.

UGH.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,573
And1: 18,059
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: The Blue Jays are this year's Rays? 

Post#6 » by Schad » Fri May 1, 2009 8:51 pm

Holmes wrote:You mean the Rays are the '07 Rockies who would be the '06 Tigers who would be the '05 White Sox who would be the '03 Marlins who would be the '98 Padres.

So the '98 Padres started the "awesomeness-out-of-nowhere-then-back-to-being-not-awesome" theme.


Somewhere, the '69 Mets are crying.
Image
**** your asterisk.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays