Twist Draft Discussion / Trade Talks

Post #21 » by **CellarDoor** » Fri May 8, 2009 9:10 pm

Latter "half" of June implies that if we were to start next week, the game would need to be 4 weeks start to finish. With 12 or 16 players drafting, unless everyone is incredibly active, the drafting will take a few weeks itself. Then a week of trading, write-ups each round? If there's four rounds of writing, we'll be into early July.

Buzzer Beater · Post #22 » by **Buzzer Beater** » Fri May 8, 2009 9:14 pm

CellarDoor wrote:Latter "half" of June implies that if we were to start next week, the game would need to be 4 weeks start to finish. With 12 or 16 players drafting, unless everyone is incredibly active, the drafting will take a few weeks itself. Then a week of trading, write-ups each round? If there's four rounds of writing, we'll be into early July.

Alright. Count me out then.

Post #23 » by **Gremz** » Sat May 9, 2009 1:27 pm

Throw me in as whatever you need.

Jud's Buechlers · Post #24 » by **Jud's Buechlers** » Sat May 9, 2009 2:36 pm

Cellar/All, I really appreciated you waiting for me for this game. But if it works out better that you start ASAP, then you can replace me if needed. If not, then I'm 100% down. Hope everyone's ready for this game... it's a good one!

Post #25 » by **Gremz** » Sun May 10, 2009 8:59 am

Question. Can we use RNGs to determine who gets so select their specific team first, or is it simply first come first serve?

Teddy KGB · Post #26 » by **Teddy KGB** » Sun May 10, 2009 8:59 am

can we get this started sometime soon? also, my name has changed to Teddy KGB

-MK- · Post #27 » by **-MK-** » Sun May 10, 2009 9:35 am

Gremz wrote:Question. Can we use RNGs to determine who gets so select their specific team first, or is it simply first come first serve?

Well, last time the teams were randomly distributed. I think it should be that way this time too.

Post #28 » by **Gremz** » Sun May 10, 2009 10:55 am

One more thing. What's the peak for each player? Single season? Five year stint? Career?

Teddy KGB · Post #29 » by **Teddy KGB** » Sun May 10, 2009 11:14 am

IMO 5 year, continuous, stint is the most accurate representation

Post #30 » by **VintaGe36** » Sun May 10, 2009 12:04 pm

Gremz can be the bitc... right hand man to me, he's not much, but I'll take him.

Post #31 » by **Gremz** » Sun May 10, 2009 12:13 pm

Hooray! Now I have a new sig.

BlackIce · Post #32 » by **BlackIce** » Sun May 10, 2009 1:00 pm

Lets start this as soon as possible.

Teddy KGB · Post #33 » by **Teddy KGB** » Sun May 10, 2009 2:02 pm

BlackIce wrote:Lets start this as soon as possible.

This.

Post #34 » by **CellarDoor** » Mon May 11, 2009 1:53 pm

As far as I know, we are still at least one short.

Post #35 » by **CellarDoor** » Mon May 11, 2009 1:55 pm

Teddy KGB wrote:IMO 5 year, continuous, stint is the most accurate representation

With regard to this, what does everyone think? The original game was going to be judged off the player as they are now.

Teddy KGB · Post #36 » by **Teddy KGB** » Mon May 11, 2009 4:33 pm

Oh ok. Well then yeah, that works too.

Post #37 » by **CellarDoor** » Mon May 11, 2009 5:02 pm

I'm more than happy to put it to a vote if anyone has any opinions on it.

deNIEd · Post #38 » by **deNIEd** » Tue May 12, 2009 3:09 am

I think it should be like the original, and judge instant 1 year roster, who wins a title

otherwise it becomes way to much speculation and hype

-MK- · Post #39 » by **-MK-** » Tue May 12, 2009 10:13 am

I really don't mind it either way.

Teddy KGB · Post #40 » by **Teddy KGB** » Tue May 12, 2009 12:30 pm

OK I think that we have a consensus [somewhat] that the players should be thought of as good as they are right now.

If we still need one more guy maybe cellar can open a thread on the trade board to recruit someone?